Comments about ‘Religious freedom under increasing pressure around the world, latest Pew report finds’

Return to article »

Published: Tuesday, Jan. 14 2014 9:25 p.m. MST

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Salt Lake City, UT

"who insist that Christian churches should not be allowed to influence or even speak up about topics, ever. They are curiously silent about Islam, though."

It applies to Islam too but since the majority of the nation is Christian, that's where the influence strong enough to change laws comes from. Also, they can speak up however they want, but the laws must have a secular reasoning to be constitutional.

USS Enterprise, UT

To "Hutterite" unfortunately the worst religions are Athiesm and Secular Humanism. They are currently the most vocal and forceful in pushing their beliefs onto the nation.

Res Novae
Ashburn, VA

Sheesh, the report is concerned with people being killed, and the comments predictably break down into the usual debate over who's worse: secularists or religionists. The stuff that's happening around the world makes our debates here look petty. Can't we at least agree that people are entitled to worship (or not) according to their own choices, and should never be subjected to some of the vile things cited in the report?

Salt Lake City, UT

I’m not surprised by the content of this article, but I’m somewhat baffled by how to interpret it. Here we have one example after another of at least one religion hindering the freedoms of another religion. Is it possible the worst enemy of religion is religion?

The Taxman
Los Angeles, CA

Unfortunately I have a job and must work, so I do not have time to read the full study today. But the takeaways from this article seem to be:

1) The right-wing ideologues in this country who claim that religious freedom is decreasing here are wrong. This study shows that religious freedom is unchanged in the Americas. Time to knock off the rhetoric here.
2) it seems abundantly clear that the genesis of most religious intolerance and persecution today is religion itself (not the absence of religion). Religious people are persecuting people of other religions or other factions of the same religion. Even state-sponsored persecution is the result of one religion entrenching itself in a government. Very ironic.

Salt Lake City, UT

Salt Lake City, UT

"Is it possible the worst enemy of religion is religion?" Marxist countries are no better at protecting religious freedom. Rigid ideology that does not respect individual agency, religious or not, is the problem.



Sorry, but when one finds something that changes their life for the better, they want to share it.

My life has changed for the better in so many ways since I returned to the Church. I am kinder, more patient, better to my family. All of that because I accepted Christ. Peace resides in my heart like never before.

Some may become over-zealous in sharing such a message. I have found though, that even if they do it is based out of love and concern for their fellow man.

Tooele, UT

@The Taxman

I totally agree with your first comment. In fact, when Christian conservatives in this country continually fight over issues like displays of the Ten Commandments at court houses, they're actually doing a disservice to the concept of freedom of religion. Those who are genuinely concerned about freedom of religion should spend more time supporting their fellow believers in other nations that do not enjoy the freedoms we do here in the USA.

As for your second comment, I would say you are partly correct. Yes, religious people are indeed persecuting other religious people in many nations. However in other countries such as China and North Korea it is still the state and the state alone which is responsible for religious oppression.

Tooele, UT


You said - "You have no problem with making derogatory remarks or laws targeting Islam or Hinduism or Shinto. The only religious people you are concerned about are either Christians or Jews."

What laws have been passed here in the U.S. against the religious groups you mentioned. As for derogatory comments, are you seriously going to tell me that Christians in this country are never targeted with derogatory comments? Are you seriously going to tell me that journalists, bloggers, political activists and comedians never insult or mock Christians?

You said - "I am Pagan. None of you have a problem making fun of my religion. You don't understand my religion; you don't even believe it's a "real" religion. If you want my respect, respect me."

Okay, tell me about your religion. I'm curious to listen.

Simple Truths
Salt Lake City, UT

Everything I read in this article points to the biggest oppressor of religious freedom is other religions.

Citizens of our nation, and nations who have adopted separation of church and state ideals are able to foster their personal faith and express it as they wish.

The cycle of oppression goes around and around: One conservative religious group takes civil power and uses it to further their cause, oppressing other groups. The oppressed groups eventually rise up and take that civil power for themselves as the old group becomes corrupted by governmental power. Then, the new groups becomes the oppressors until they stagnate and are replaced by a new group. Around and around and around they go.

I'm so proud and thankful to be an American where our system of separation allows every person and faith community to cultivate and grow their beliefs without being tainted by the lure of governmental power.

The Taxman
Los Angeles, CA

"Some may become over-zealous in sharing such a message. I have found though, that even if they do it is based out of love and concern for their fellow man."

So when as Islamic terrorist detonates a bomb, killing hundreds of innocent people, we should chalk that up to him being over-zealous in sharing his message out of his concern for his fellow man?

State College, PA

Any law (laws force people to live a certain way) that is passed comes from someone's ideas of values or beleifs, whether or not those values or beleifs were obtained from a religious source or otherwise. I don't understand why a growing number of people think that only values and beleifs obtained from non-religious sources are valid and should therefore be forced upon people but values and beleifs obtained from religious sources are never valid and should be eliminated completely from public life.

Simple Truths
Salt Lake City, UT

Ten steps to destroying religious freedom:
1. Followers of one faith decide to use the power of their numbers or wealth to increase their earthly influence.
2. That faith begins to influence government. If you don’t follow that faith, you are at a disadvantage at every point of civic contact.
3. Civic leaders and religious leaders begin to overlap.
4. The church becomes a path to power subjecting church leadership to political intrigue.
5. Practices that were once unique to the dominant faith become mandatory and enforceable by law whether you believe in those practices or not.
6. Religious practices loose efficacy because they are no longer expressions of faith; they are mandates.
7. The dominant church is corrupted by power as it becomes a branch of government and its workings become about power not spirituality.
8. In effort to keep and hold now corrupted power, the church suppresses any who speak against it and punish heresy with civic power. They can imprison, seize property, and kill any who contradict the establishment.
9. Spiritual minorities either within the church or from another faith rise up against the oppression and corruption and seize power for themselves.
10. Repeat.


@ tsquared
"I don't understand why a growing number of people think that only values and beleifs obtained from non-religious sources are valid and should therefore be forced upon people but values and beleifs obtained from religious sources are never valid and should be eliminated completely from public life".

I believe this statement is a straw man argument that completely misrepresents reality. In reality, very few, if any, people believe that values obtained from religious sources are "never valid". The debate should be to what extent one person' or group's values (whether rooted in religion or not) should be used as a basis to persecute or restrict the freedom of others.

Here, UT

@Phillip M Hotchkiss;

I criticize you and your religions because you/they are trying to force others to live by your beliefs. When you stop, I'll stop. You reap what you sow.


You say: "The 10th amendment grants states to believe what they want to believe, that's why it's okay for Utah to define marriage between a man and a woman, because they should have the right to believe what they want to believe. "

The 10th amendment doesn't say what you think it says. It says that states have authority over what is NOT PROHIBITED them. Guess what, discrimination against US citizens is prohibited the states. You don't get to define terms such that they purposely discriminate against certain US citizens you don't like.


Good for you and your life. I'm glad you're in a better place than you wee. My life, on the other hand has been immeasurably better since I left "the church".

Pasedena, CA

To "Ranch" but isn't that what the gays are doing with all of their gay marriage lawsuits? They are trying to force those that do not believe in gay marriage to accept gay marriage.

As for the 10th Ammendment, you are wrong. It tells the states that if there is nothing said about something in the Constitution, then it is up to the state to decide how to handle it. Since there is nothing in the Constitution about marriage, then it is up to the states or the people to decide. We decided, now a judge has decided that the 10th ammendment doesn't mean anything.

Church member
North Salt Lake, UT

To RedWings:

I am all for Mormons and other religious people sharing their faith with me. I am also cool with missionaries knocking on my door. But when I try to spread my beliefs (that all religion is man made) with my family and friends they seem to get annoyed that I am trying to share that with them. It has to go both ways.

When people try and talk to me or show me things about the Mormon church I always say "I will listen to what you have to say if you will listen to what I have to say". They usually say never mind. They don't want to hear opposing view points.

Before Adam

Many of my faith (Mormons) Believe that Marriage should be legally defined by government. It is hard to study church history, the new testament and prayerfully ask what the lord would have me do. then when receiving such revelation when I know to be true is opposed to the popular view. It is hard to disagree with the policy of the church in this matter... even if my view is based on doctrine and not the opinions of current apostles. This is one of the problems with living in Utah. This not only a problem with me but non Mormons that live in Utah, they call the religious legislation for what it is, unchristian.

Mormon for Ron Paul

I love this sentence,
"That is not true of other dominant religions, where it is more common for the dominant religion to align with the state to the detriment of religious minorities and schismatics within their own faith."

It seems The State of Utah does not understand this Irony.

Render unto Ceaser. We make mammon enforce the laws of God. the laws of God become corrupted and the corrupt laws corrupt our society to be violent and judgmental, instead of using the spirit of Christ to persuade, we use guns to enforce. Gays cant drink at the well of tax breaks and stewardship rights because they are unclean. anyone that says otherwise is a heretic.

If you personally believe the rhetoric about defining marriage as one man and one woman, and are a Mormon I plead that you prayerfully study D&C134:4,9

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments