Quantcast

Comments about ‘My view: The president’s minimum wage mind games’

Return to article »

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 19 2013 12:00 a.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Blue
Salt Lake City, UT

The "Employment Policy Institute" is another fake front group created by the PR firm that represents the hotel and restaurant industry. Look it up for yourself. It is, btw, a PR firm that also has worked on behalf of the tobacco industry to try to persuade congress that there is no link between chewing tobacco and cancer of the mouth.

Here's the indisputable fact: If the minimum wage had kept pace with inflation from when I was a teen it would now be well above $10 per hour.

Moreover, many places in the US have raised their minimum wage significantly above the federal level and seen no negative consequences to their employment and economies.

marxist
Salt Lake City, UT

"Employment Policies Institute" What right wing think tank it this? Well, anyway one should understand the the minimum wage under-girds the entire wage structure. American labor has not had an increase in real wages for thirty years. A bump up of the minimum wage would shift the wage structure upward. We desperately need this, as labor and the working class fall farther and farther behind, creating inadequate demand for goods and services. Wage stagnation is one of the reasons for what appears to be a permanent recession.

marxist
Salt Lake City, UT

Moreover, stagnation of the minimum wage is how capital has kept the overall real wage fixed or declining for the last 30 years.

Mountanman
Hayden, ID

All wages should be tied to the free market where a person is paid for the value they bring, what they produce. That's why doctors EARN more money than hamburger flippers! The problem with the government dictating wages is that people are paid for what they didn't earn and that creates Marxist countries like N. Korea, Cuba, the former E. Germany, the former USSR, et al. If we continue to reward low achievement, laziness, bad choices and failure, we will have much more of that at every level in our society as per Detroit, Chicago, New York, et al.

Pagan
Salt Lake City, UT

The 'Free Market'…

lead to the Great Depression. In which an Americans income was…

3 cents an hour.

Inflation is 3% per year.

An average American workers raise is, less than 1% per year, if at all.

Poverty, is by design.

And people are making up facts, in order to insult the president about trying to change that.

Mountanman
Hayden, ID

@ Pagan, Have you ever considered why every socialist/communist society in history has eventually collapsed? Like I said, If we continue to reward low achievement, laziness, bad choices and failure, we will have much more of that at every level in our society as per Detroit, Chicago, New York, et al. And there are not enough food stamps in the world to overcome it!

DVD
Taylorsville, 00

The minimum wage was made legal during the Great Depression wasn't it? Did the labor situation improve or worsen during the 30-60 years after its establishment compared to the 30-60 years before it? It improved and a viable middle class emerged.

We've arrived again at a place where we have regions that only offer minimum wage jobs. You can quit one, but your only options are others at minimum wage. But often working full time at minimum wage can still leave you as bad off as if you worked and lived in a company town in the 1890s or in Bangledesh now.

Kent C. DeForrest
Provo, UT

So, Mtnmn, please explain to me how the labor market could ever be considered "free." When wage laborers are, by definition, commodities, how can they be free? I spent several years on the faculty of a nationally ranked business school. The students there are still being taught that they are marketable products and must sell themselves to corporations. This definition of the human being, as a resource or commodity to be purchased by a business, is not what I would call freedom.

If we were really serious about bringing our authoritarian economic system into harmony with our political system and social ideals, we would be promoting increased worker ownership of businesses, so that laborers can actually receive a fair share of the profits they create. Historian Christopher Lasch pointed out that after the rise of the modern corporation, "hardly anyone asked any more whether freedom was consistent with hired labor. People groped instead, in effect, for a moral and social equivalent of the widespread property ownership one considered indispensable to the success of democracy." We still haven't discovered that equivalent.

Minimum wage is just the tip of this particular iceberg.

atl134
Salt Lake City, UT

@Mountanman
"Have you ever considered why every socialist/communist society in history has eventually collapsed?"

Every society in history that eventually collapsed collapsed. What about the UK? Canada? France? Japan? Sweden? Germany? Australia? Those are all socialist and doing just fine. Like it or not the US has one of the highest (with Mexico and Brazil) wealth inequalities in the industrialized world. When shown unlabeled pie charts of wealth distribution in Sweden and the US, 92% of Americans said they'd rather live in a country with a distribution like the chart that ended up being Sweden.

Pagan
Salt Lake City, UT

'@ Pagan, Have you ever considered why every socialist/communist society in history has eventually collapsed?'


Have you considered that every civilization before the current ones have collapsed?

Logical fallacy.

ALONG WITH, the civilizations that did, nothing.

Churchill said it best.

'Democracy is the worst form of government, except for everything that came before it.'

When you have a better idea, you will get support.

Until then, the adults are trying to work on solutions. Not taking pride in a lack of, solutions.

one old man
Ogden, UT

Meanwhile McDonald's hands its underpaid workers (average hourly pay $8.45) a "sample budget" that does not include expenses for food but does include income from a second job while telling them that they just need to become smarter about how they use their money.

McDonald's CEO, Don Thompson, is getting a $13.8 million pay package, including use of a corporate jet for personal use, free physical exams, financial counseling, and a security detail.

A worker at Dunkin' Donuts receives $7.86 per hour while their CEO rakes in $950 per hour.

At Pappa Johns, a worker works for a pathetic $7.18 an hour while the Big Papa draws $1,600 an hour. At Dominos Pizza, the CEO takes home $4500 per hour.

Because of these low wages, taxpayers pick up a tab of $1.2 BILLION to subsidize workers in the $200 billion restaurant industry as they are forced to use food stamps and other public programs.

Isn't this the kind of thing the Tea Party should be gunning for?

RedShirt
USS Enterprise, UT

To "Pagan" you are wrong. The free market did not lead us into the great depression. That was the hand of government. Yes the free market had the crash, but had the government done nothing or at most cut its spending back, we would never have had the Great Depression. In 1919 there was a crash bigger than in 1929, but it was gone and a distant memory by July 1921. The Great Depression was a result in Government intervention in the free market.

utahcitizen1
Vernal, UT

What I don't get is why people think they have right to the CEO's money? I've worked minimum wage jobs, but understood that even if the CEO diverted a large proportion of their salary to paying line workers higher amounts of money, the amount they could pay everyone is negligible.The CEO keeps a business running that is giving the minimum wage worker a job and income. They also have skills that the vast majority of minimum wage workers do not have. If the minimum wage worker does have better skills (inherently or gained through education), my experience is that they move up and don't earn minimum wage for long. I think people should be paid proportionate to the amount of income their skill set can bring into a business. Like this article said the MAJORITY of minimum wage workers are young. This suggests most people do not earn minimum wage during the majority of their life, but earn it while they are in the process of improving their skills to deserve more.

wrz
Phoenix, AZ

@marxist: "Wage stagnation is one of the reasons for what appears to be a permanent recession."

Current wage stagnation is the result of millions of immigrants (illegal and otherwise) coming into this country to work. Wage levels, in our economy, are mostly determined by the availability of labor. Most immigrants are thankful for almost any level of pay they can get compared to what they earn (if they can even find work) in their country of origin. Obama's 'soft on immigration' policy is the major cause of immigration influx and thus, our current recession.

@one old man:
"Because of these low wages, taxpayers pick up a tab of $1.2 BILLION to subsidize workers in the $200 billion restaurant industry as they are forced to use food stamps and other public programs."

But, if those restaurant workers were to get wage increases the cost of the service/product they provide to the consumer increases. So, its a trade-off of whether the consumer pays in taxes or pays in increased service/product cost.

Remember, the cost of all goods and services produced is about 80 to 90 percent labor.

procuradorfiscal
Tooele, UT

As the main article points out, this is merely another in a long, long, long series of disingenuous liberal ploys, being being pushed in the hope of gaining partisan political advantage, even thought its inevitable result will be to hurt the very people liberals claim to care about.

It's maddening that liberals are permitted by uncurious, incompetent media to disingenuously peddle their ideas and actions as "looking out for the little guy."

Truth is, literally everything they do hurts, rather than helps the little guy.

Liberals clearly demonstrate their surpassing indifference to the plight of the "little guys" who will lose their jobs, as the direct, predictable, knowing result of this cynical, partisan political tactic.

Kent C. DeForrest
Provo, UT

So, to put my earlier comment in different words, we shouldn't really even be having a conversation about "minimum wage." If we were serious about bringing our economic system in line with our political principles and social ideals (the ones both Republicans and Democrats agree upon), we should be having a conversation about "minimum ownership."

There was a time in this country when government chartered corporations very reluctantly and restricted them to either a term of existence of about 20 years or until they had served the purpose for which they were created. And corporations were created in those days to serve public purposes, not to enrich private citizens. The invention of the railroad and the demands of the Civil War changed all that. Now the tail is wagging the dog. If Lincoln were alive today, he would be forced to rewrite his famous Gettysburg conclusion to read: "government of the corporation, by the corporation, and for the corporation."

atl134
Salt Lake City, UT

@procuradorfiscal
"even thought its inevitable result will be to hurt the very people liberals claim to care about."

There have been plenty of minimum wage increases in states and the nation over the past 50 years that there's a large enough sample size for researchers to have determined that the effect of minimum wage hikes on jobs gained/lost is near 0. So uh... who is hurting again?

one old man
Ogden, UT

WRZ - it has been reported that in order to pay McDonald's workers $15 an hour, the price of a Big Mac would need to be raised by ten cents. That number is based on the number of Big Macs sold worldwide.

wrz
Phoenix, AZ

@Kent C. DeForrest:
"There was a time in this country when government chartered corporations very reluctantly and restricted them to..."

I think you're a little confused about the business entity called 'corporations.'

There are basically three types of business structures... (1) sole proprietorships, (2) partnerships, and (3) corporations.

Corporations were created as a legal business entity for a couple-a good reasons... to protect owners (stockholders) from being sued (except in rare instances where the corporate veil can be pierced), to spread ownership over a wide population (stockholders), and for business longevity/stability.

Corporations are a legally created 'person' so that, when legal action is sought against a business the action goes against the corporate entity, not the ownership. Not so with sole proprietorships and partnerships were the owners can be sued and drained of all possessions/assets including their residences.

If there were no corporations there would be only sole proprietorships and partnerships who would be mostly short lived businesses, disappearing at the death (or whim) of the owners. We need stability and longevity in the business world thus corporations have become an essential business structure in today's world.

ConservativeCommonTater
West Valley City, UT

The Employment Policy Institute is just another right-wing mutual admiration society that has little credibility.

per Wiki: According to Source Watch, EPI is one of several front groups created by Berman and Company, a Washington, D.C. public relations organization that lobbies for the restaurant, hotel, alcoholic beverage and tobacco industries.[4][5] It should not be confused with the older, similarly named Economic Policy Institute, which is a liberal think tank advocating for low to moderate-income families in the United States.[6]

Australia began their minimum wage program about the same time as the U.S. Their economy and $dollar strength is on par with the U.S....yet....as of 2012...

Most workers are covered by an award, which may vary by employee age, geographical location and industry. For adults not covered by an award or agreement, the minimum wages is A$16.37 per hour, A$622.20 per week; set federally by Fair Work Australia. Junior workers, apprentices and trainees not covered by an award each have a minimum wage level set nationally.[18][19]

If businesses can't pay a living wage to employees, perhaps they should not be in business.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments