Published: Wednesday, Nov. 13 2013 12:00 a.m. MST
Re: "These are all good changes. They force insurance companies to cover
essential health benefits . . . ."Sorry, Prof, that's just
standard socialist perfidy.Fact is, insurance companies will pay for
absolutely NOTHING. Every nickel of corrupt, vote-buying Obamacare largesse will
be paid out of my pocket. And yours. And that of every other working
American.I know, that's a hard concept for mindless liberals to
wrap there arms around, but, it's a fact, Prof -- there is no health-care
fairy.It's just a disingenuous liberal myth, being
disingenuously sold to low-information voters, in the hope of corruptly
obtaining unfair political advantage over those committed to telling the truth,
in order to exercise illegal and unconstitutional control over Americans they
don't really like.That's all.
Everyone already knows about Obamacare and most people call it "bait and
switch". So let's remove those people loosing health coverage, other
people are still loosing coverage on top of that. Wegmans Grocery in upstate
New York cut employee health benefits due to the Affordable Care Act. There are
numerous other companies cutting insurance, Trader Joe's comes to mind,
because they are forcing the employees into the exchanges. Then your premium in
the exchange doubles, not to mention the deductible surging. Before Obamacare I
could get insurance for $46.00 per month, after Obamacare the premium goes to
$160.00 and the deductible surges $1,000 over the last one. How is this not as
bad as it seems? I can point to many problems with this health care
legislation, shouldn't you have mentioned some of the other issues going on
as well. For the entire U.S. workforce, employers have added far more
part-time employees in 2013—averaging 93,000 a month, seasonally
adjusted—than full-time workers. People can't survive on part time
work and this law is forcing them into it.
Tyler DSo Obama did not lie. Thanks for clearing that up. I always
thought Bush had lied about WMD in Iraq. And Clinton lied about Monica
Lewinski. Guess I was wrong. Obviously Presidents get a whole different set
of standards of truth that don't apply to the average person. Thanks again
for clearing all that up for the rest of us Tyler.
It is not perfect and is a work in progress, but it has very good bones. Also,
as a prior There are accusations that people were lied to about being to keep
their own plan. Yes, in theory a person can. But if the insurance company
decides to cancel a person, that says more about the insurance company doing it
than it says about the ACA. The ACA is designed to make things fair for the
insured person and if an insurance can't keep the requirements, then the
insured probably should change to a plan that qualifies (no pre-existing
condition, no caps and so forth).I have seen progress on the
healthcare.gov website, but be aware there are also third parties like Arches
that help an individual with their questions.Best wishes to all in
One of the stated goals of Obamacare was to decrease the cost of health care in
America. In that regard, though it may be too early to grade, Obamacare is
failing miserably. Premiums are increasing. Health costs are not coming down
at all. Overall health spending has decreased the past few years, but that had
nothing to do with Obamacare as it is only now being implemented, other than
some insurance mandates on pre-existing coverage and covering family to age
25.Additionally, premiums that are lower are primarily due to
subsidization. The family may realize an overall decrease to their premiums,
but overall the premium has increased in cost. It is just being subsidized by
someone else.Obamacare is a mess from a financial/cost perspective,
an organizational perspective, a PR, a legal, social...basically in every way it
is an utter failure.
Before Obamacare I could get insurance for $46.00 per month, after Obamacare the
premium goes to $160.00 and the deductible surges $1,000 over the last one. Wow you must of had total garbage coverage as I can't get dental
coverage here in Utah for that cheap. Your rates and deductible went up to
where mine have been for nearly 4 years, welcome to responsible coverage.You must have never used your great insurance or they would have told you that
it only covered part of your left.As far as part time vs full time,
well that's just the sainted "Job Creators" creating more wealth
for themselves, and a separate issue. If we use the conservative approach maybe
if we give them more tax breaks. Or No corporate tax since they pass it on to
the consumer anyway we should just take all taxes from the workers.
procuradorfiscal: "Fact is, insurance companies will pay for absolutely
NOTHING. Every nickel of corrupt, vote-buying Obamacare largesse will be paid
out of my pocket. And yours. And that of every other working American."This is a great argument for a one payer system, and you are correct
that is the way it's suppose to work, every able bodied American paying
their share. Not some of us paying more and more to counter the
Republican's plan ERHCP (Emergency Room Health Care Plan) that Reagan
signed into law. Come to think of it, that's the last time a republican did
anything about the healthcare problem in America, I mean beside complain and
hinder.Socialized medicine wouldn't have private insurance
companies as a money changer between you and your doctor.
Richard - these are all tired old talking points from the White House that have
been proven false. The entire Obamacare scam is just that - a scam - that is now
being exposed and these talking points don't mean anything when people - in
the millions - are getting cancellation notices and then being faced with new
premiums 2-3 times higher and with doctors they have never met. Even more scary
is the employer mandate is going to kick in in less than a year which will means
even more cancellations. This is a disaster Richard and it is time to drop the
talking points and realize the Obamacare scam is out in the open now and even
Bill Clinton has acknowledged that.
@SCfan, actually Tyler said the lies being blown out of proportion are silly.
Much like comparing Clintons lies about an affair to Bushes lies
about WMD that started a war and cost thousands their lives, yep lying about
infidelity is the same as lying to start a war.Maybe it isn't
so much the lies as the ability to comprehend the difference between "No
honey, you don't look fat in those pants" and "Saddam Hussein has
got nukes, and nerve gas, and board with a nail sticking out of it and he's
got your home address.
re:Happy Valley HereticBush didn't lie about WMD's. Our
own CIA provided him with the intel and ALL members of congress of both parties
saw the intel. Get your facts straight. The WMD intel was the best we had at the
time and Bush made a judgement - which I didn't agree with - to not wait
for more certain confirmation but instead go forward and invade and get rid of
the threat. The difference here is Bush made a judgement call that was proven
later to be wrong but his intent was GOOD and HONEST. Baracks intent with
Obamacare was DISHONEST from the start. Big difference.
So what will the White House reaction be too all this Obamacare implosion?? My
guess is we will soon see Barack back out on the campaign trail attempting to
white wash his clueless followers with more propaganda and then have his
friendly media film the whole thing to suggest all is well with OBamacare.
Propaganda is about all that is left to salvage for Barack at this point....the
scam is exposed.
Anybody can choose their own healthcare, but if you want insurance to pay for
it, a person has to live by the insurances rules. Some of the personal plans
don't want (or don't think they can) follow the fair rules that are
part of the ACA (No pre-existing conditions, no caps and so forth) and so they
are cancelling the personal plans. Those people need to choose the good plans
available in the ACA. The bigger plans don't generally have that problem
because it's part of a big group that have chosen it. Those plans have to
abide by the fair rules in the ACA to stay in existence.
I applaud you, Dr. Davis, for blasting the stereotype of the weak and
inconsequential college professor: you have proven that you can carry the
President's water with the best of them. The policy I had one year ago has
been cancelled,and I can tell you first-hand that my insurance was not
substandard or inferior; it was just more affordable than the government can
allow and still pay for millions of others who need more care than a young adult
like myself needs. What Obama has given me is the opportunity to pay more for a
plan I don't want out of the goodness of my heart so that he can use the
additional revenue to cover a group of people I have never met. I should at
least get a monthly letter and photograph from the families I support by
complying with Obamacare.
This is an EXCELLENT opinion piece. Pleased to see it in Desert News.Hope that it is widely read because it provides an excellent unbiased
Many of the conservative commenters here seem to think that President
Obama's intent with the ACA was simply to deceive and enslave us. Nonsense.
As imperfect as the ACA is, the intent all along was to provide some decent,
affordable health care to the roughly 50 million Americans who could get none.
That it is imperfect is unfortunate, but it would be working a lot
better if all the states had done what they insisted on: having the right to set
up their own health insurance exchanges. Most of the states that have used this
option are exemplary. By the same token, the federal government would have had a
better program if it had been allowed to set up one single exchange for the
entire country, instead of having to deal piecemeal with the varying
requirements for all the states that later chose to go back on their demand of
setting up state-by-state exchanges. And which are those states? Red states.
Another example of Republican hypocrisy. Demand something and then sabotage it.
Someone needs to get the facts right. My families plan was terminated due to
the fact it would not qualify for the guidelines of the Affordable Care Act.(And
we liked it for the past 3 years) That is exactly what it said, and we had
insurance through my wife's employer. Not purchased on our own but through
her company that employees 14 people. Uh, I also drive a Dodge Truck and own an
SUV, is our gov. going to tell me now they don't qualify to be on the road
so I have to buy a Prius? And a Prius for everyone that can not afford one??
Holy crud this stuff just makes me sick.
What's the old saying? Liberals are in favor of anything as long as
it's mandatory. I couldn't believe Mr Davis' column. How can
anyone think that the US Govt is capable of making the healthcare arrangements
for 300 million people? Not to mention the fact that we supposedly live as free
men in an allegedly free country- except we need permission from unelected
bureaucrats before we can buy a health insurance policy or even buy a home with
cash. I'm a man- I don't maternity insurance. I don't need
mental health coverage. I can buy my own contraceptives. I'm 44 years old
and I'm pretty certain what my sexuality is so I don't need an
operation to transgender myself. What I need is an insurance policy that
protects me and my family in case of a catastrophic event - I can pay everything
else myself and get a better rate paying cash. I've had it with all
these control freak people who can't stand the thought of someone in this
country making a decision on their own.
@Joe CapitalistIf you decided to pay on your own and you had a child born
with a medical emergency would you be ok if they told you to bring a $10,000
certified check or the kid dies?
Re: "Many of the conservative commenters here seem to think that President
Obama's intent with the ACA was simply to deceive and enslave us."Yeah! We've been saying it all along.Obama has
demonstrated that his intent is to socialize and control health care, to assure
that important decisions about American's lives are in the hands of leftist
politicos and bureaucrats, enabling them to use that power -- literally of life
or death -- to control us.I'd call that enslaving us.He's also on record perpetrating sophistry and knowing, intentional lies,
trying desperately to sell what he knows is a really bad idea to the
low-information America liberal educational and social-program policies have
created.And yeah -- socialized medicine would, indeed, remove a
middleman, making direct government control of our lives much more efficient and
crushing. But, only committed socialists would say that like it was a good
thing.Bottom line -- Obamacare is a war against America. Liberal
sophistry being used to sell it is a weapon in that war. Opposition to Obamacare
is American patriotism.
Sad that an employee of a university not only excuses a lie, but vigorously
defends it. I thought universities were supposed to be in the business of
pursuing and propogating truth! Silly me!
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments