Religious liberty is not at risk in the U.S. Pope Francis, speaking
at a Mass last week:"The faith passes, so to speak, through a
distiller and becomes ideology,he said, according to Radio Vatican. And ideology
does not beckon [people]. In ideologies there is not Jesus: in his tenderness,
his love, his meekness. And ideologies are rigid, always. Of every sign:
rigid.And when a Christian becomes a disciple of the ideology, he
has lost the faith: he is no longer a disciple of Jesus, he is a disciple of
this attitude of thought. For this reason Jesus said to them: You have taken
away the key of knowledge. The knowledge of Jesus is transformed into an
ideological and also moralistic knowledge, because these close the door with
many requirements.The faith becomes ideology and ideology frightens,
ideology chases away the people, distances, distances the people and distances
of the Church of the people, Francis added. But it is a serious illness, this of
ideological Christians. It is an illness, but it is not new, eh?
Only when believers will stand up for the rights of nonbelievers, and only when
we start seeing nonbelievers elected to public office without having to pretend
to be believers, and only when believers cease condemning and morally judging
nonbelievers as inferior, only then will our society be said to have embraced
true "religious diversity".
@The ScientistYou should also add:When non believers
stand up for the rights of believers.It is not a one way street.
there will be no diversity of conscience without it, if the believers are not
the truth,Non believers have been "standing up for" and
giving their lives for the rights of believers from the founding of this
country.But what we will no longer tolerate is the insistence of
believers to continue their hegemony and privileged situation dominating this
It is natural that, at this point, that believers would forget their differences
and unite in the face of a relentless common enemy, an intolerant and
contemptuous pseudo-scientific atheistical attack on all that is sacred and
moral to people of faith.
@the truth – “When non believers stand up for the rights of
believers.”I can think of no greater instance of non-believers
not only standing up for believers but actually making their protection the top
right in a newly formed nation than when our Deist (as non-believer as you can
get without being a full-fledged atheist) Founders created the governing charter
of our country. Considering the long history of how believers have
treated non-believers, this was a singular act of magnanimity for which
religious folks have been trying to hijack and take credit for ever since, not
to mention their ceaseless effort to recast the Founding in their image (with
some churches even going so far as to say it was all “divinely
inspired”). “For any dogmatism to succeed, first we
must insure that citizens remain ignorant of facts and history” – by
So now you are the only scientist in the world?Atheists typically
fight in wars for the same reason as believers: they are forced to.@
Tyler DDeists are not "as near as you can get to atheists"
as you say in so many words.Deists ARE believers and therefore the
OPPOSITE of atheists. Deists fighting for believers, are believers fighting for
You want us to speak up for religious freedom in the Deseret News do you not?
You then make it virtually impossible by banning any name for deity in the
discussions. I do not get this at all. This is almost as bad as being in a
public school where such names are never mentioned - except of course in
blasphemous exclamations which are probably encouraged, but not in their true
context. Just saying.....
I have been wanting to point out:Freedom "from" religion
cannot co-exist with freedom "of" religion.The first negates the
@Tyler DThe founders were NOT deists.They were very
strong believers in Christ and God, especially a God that did intervene in the
affairs of men.They just didn't believe any of the current
sects of the day were Gods Church.(deists, by the way, are those
that believe in a watchmaker god, a God that starts the watch but does not get
involved after that, the founders clearly did not believe in that kind of God,
the founder were not deists)
@Pssst – “Deists are not "as near as you can get to
atheists" as you say in so many words.”You are right to
the extent that Deists believe in a creator of the universe, but they typically
believe this creator is more like a Force (of nature) or Prime Mover than an
actual being.Further, Deists do not believe this creator (once the
universe was set in motion) interacts in any way with it, does not take any
interest in our lives, does not perform miracles, and does not reveal
(revelation) itself in any way except as nature itself.So from a
practical standpoint, that belief is in fact as close as you can get to being an
atheist while still being a believer (i.e., it’s a distinction with little
if any difference).@the truth – “The founders were NOT
deists.”I suggest you research this yourself (from unbiased
sources) – notably, the beliefs of the key founders Franklin, Jefferson,
Madison, Hamilton, Allen, Paine and Washington.
@Tyler DBy your own definition of 'deist', which is what I
said it was, the founders were not deists.They believed in a God
that does intercede in the affairs of men and answers prayers, and in whom we
get our rights.Paine, indecently was not a founder of the
constitutional republic or the country, but only an instigator of the
revolutionary war. So I would not classify him as a founder.
@the truth – “the founders were not deists.”Some
quotes below from our founders might help… and by the way, no Paine, no
revolution – no revolution, no country. He was a (maybe the) key figure in
our founding.“… the original states thus founded on the
natural authority of the people alone, without a pretense of miracle or
mystery.”“Question with boldness even the existence of a
God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason,
then that of blindfolded fear.”“Religions are all
alike—founded upon fables and mythologies.”“Lighthouses are more useful than churches.”"The
United States in is no sense founded upon the Christian religion." "Revealed religion has no weight with me." "I do not
find in Christianity one redeeming feature." "This could be
the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it." "I disbelieve all holy men and holy books." "In no
instance have churches been the guardians of the liberties of the people."
"The Christian god is cruel, vindictive, capricious, and
unjust." "What has been Christianity's fruits?
Superstition, bigotry, and persecution."
Sorry none of quotes prove they were deists.And more over without
context they are meaningless.And I believe my previous comments
clearly answered why they said some the things they said. But that doesn't
change their belief in an interceding God.
@ Tyler D:Who made each of those specific quotes and when? Most I
have never seen before. In fact to the contrary, I've seen quite a few
quotes confirming many of the founders strong beliefs in God and also in Jesus
Christ, and which played a strong part in the foundational principles expounded
in the Constitution and some of its amendments. I sincerely believe any
quotes to the contrary were made by only a small minority of the founders and
sometimes quoted out of context.
@the truth – “Sorry none of quotes prove they were deists.”Perhaps not, (that would take more than a few quotes) but I think it
strongly suggests they were not the pious Christians many of today’s folks
(mostly on the religious right) think they were. @Tators
– “Who made each of those specific quotes and when?”Constrained by the 200 word limit I left off the names, but dropping any of
those quotes into Google should give the name for each one. And I
think you’re right that many of the leading figures (signers of the
Constitution, etc…) were Christians – as was the vast majority of
the population. But it’s simply a fact that some of the key founders
(e.g., Franklin, Jefferson, Paine, Madison) were highly critical of organized
religion and religious belief in general.Also, many were deeply
influenced by the ideas of the Enlightenment which promoted reason (vs.
revelation) as the best methods for human progress. The great thinkers of that
era were questioning many past assumptions including religious ones.Yes, quotes can be misleading and contextual… so research them yourself
and see what you find.