I love this country but I've got to agree. I lived in England for a couple
of years and saw that even back then (the 1980's) their school standards
and results were far better than what is expected of American grade school
students. I blame the too powerful teachers unions which want to watch out more
for their employees than the students they are supposed to be teaching. Way too
much money ends up anywhere but the classroom. Competetion in education, like
anything else, brings better results.
American teachers aren't highly educated people. To much of their time
getting their degrees is spent taking education classes.
I am hosting a French exchange student this school year. Compare the difference
in time at school. Her school days went from 8:00am to 5:00pm and they went to
school on Saturdays. Summer vacation was much shorter. No wonder our kids are
behind. Want to cry? Ash a teenager what the US Constitution is.
@procuradorfiscalThe “study” that Roland Kayser referred
to was published on non-disingenuous, non-left-leaning, non-biased Fox Business
Network. What’s your next plan? Claiming Fox News is also disingenuous,
left-leaning and biased? Do you have any other survey showing that the best
educated states actually voted for Romney?I DO, however, agree with
you that “Shoveling money to teachers and their unions simply won't
-- CAN'T -- solve America's education problems.” We need to
change our culture from over-glorifying sports, entertainment and celebrity to
value education and academic success, which means students need to work harder
on school work and parents should be more responsible. From all the surveys that
I know, those states voted for Obama ARE better educated in general (if you know
otherwise, I would love to learn). I don’t know why, maybe the people over
there value education more, are more enlightened and less anti-intellectual. Or
maybe those states did something right.
Ever notice how any critique of American education usually boils down to one
thing? Dollar signs! Education, apparently, is supposed to fit us out for the
economy. It will make us prosperous and competitive in a global marketplace.
Prosperity has become the measuring stick of education.There was a
time in America when education was the thing that qualified us for liberty. It
was part of happy human lives--the chief component of the "pursuit of
happiness" which had very little to do with economic gain and very much to
do with civic virtue.What would happen to education in America if we
were to change our cultural story so that, rather than people serving the
economy, it was the other way around? What if the measuring stick of Education
became civic virtue instead of money?Maybe education in America is
so hard to get right because we are doing it for the wrong reasons.
2 bits, I'm fully aware that 3 Scandinavian countries are constitutional
monarchies. Income inequality is STILL much lower in those countries than in the
USA. Your image of Europe seems not to have progressed beyond Robin Hood movies.
I started working in public schools as a substitute teacher last year and am
amazed at the number of parents who are at the school helping (for free), the
amount of money teachers are shelling out of their pockets for supplies, and how
awful the textbooks are when available. Most classes don't have enough
books to go around, so students are sharing them. The dependence on technology
is, I think, overrated. I think we could do with less tech and more hands on
teaching, but how can a teacher spend time with students when there are 35 in
the classroom? To those who defend our schools, yes they do a amazing job with
most students considering all that is against them. To those who denigrate our
schools and teachers, maybe you need to spend some time at the school. You
might be surprised by what is going on there. Education starts at a very early
age, that is why head start, pre-school or even an at home mom with time to
teach the kids is/are so vitally important. Yes our students do well, but based
on demographics they should . But They can do better! They really can.
Irony Guy,Re: "Northern European countries have little income
inequality"...Is that why many of these countries still have
Kings, Queens, and Lords? Little income inequality huh...The Irony
in your statement is... There's a wider gap of income equality between the
Kings and their families and the common people in most of these countries than
there is between the CEO and his workers in the United States. And most of
those CEOs came from other countries and from middle to lower class families
(instead of having to be born to Royal families).If you don't
believe me, google "Monarchies in Europe" and see the map in WikiPedia.
Many Northern European countries are still Monarchies (meaning they have a
King).Sweden, Norway, United Kingdom, Spain, Belgium, Netherlands,
Denmark, are all Monarchies. I wonder if you realized that. There are
currently twelve (12) extant sovereign monarchies in Europe today.Between the Royals and there subjects there is a WIDE income inequality gap.
Northern European countries have a stable, prosperous economy with little income
inequality. They highly value education; thus they lead the world. This is not
the reality in the USA.
@2 bits – “I seriously doubt it's genetic.”Never said it was… culture (as you point out) is a big factor.And I agree – I doubt we’ll sprout a nation a Tiger Moms anytime
soon and I’m not sure we want to. From what little I know (you would more
insight) the overly competitive culture of Japan seems to create other problems
that our diverse country would likely magnify exponentially.But
Finland is an interesting case – kids don’t even start school there
until age 7 and they appear to be well rounded and generally happy (in addition
to having the #1 education system in the world).I think vouchers is
the key – as long as schools still go through a basic accreditation
process, it’s the only way for schools to become consistently motivated,
innovative and customer (student) focused… all the things monopolies
(including our current public education system) are not. The have
worked to great success in very liberal countries like France & Sweden so in
no way should they be seen as some far-right tool to destroy public
education… they will save it.
Ah, Procura -- spoken like true believer in the propaganda garbage of the
farthest right end of the right wing hate radio mouths.Truly
educated people are not listening to that nonsense.
Tyler D,I seriously doubt it's genetic. I served
a mission in Japan and their schools are not great in general. But kids DO get
a good education there. How does that happen?... Kids and families there are
super motivated, and seek every opportunity to learn (they don't avoid them
and try to find the EASIEST way to get through school). When they get out of
school they go straight to other classes and work on education on their own
(outside the class room) WAY more than American students do.There
are some down sides to the way they do it in Japan as well. large
disparities in education. it's critical to get into the right schools.
To insure acceptance families start enrolling their kids in the most expensive
and prestigious pre-schools possible (to make sure their kids test well and get
accepted to the best schools). Then they pressure their kids incredibly all
through school and fill them with fear that IF they don't get accepted to
the right school they will fail the family. HighSchool suicide rates are
incredible in Japan (especially right after testing results are announced).Is that what we want?
While there’s no question that education should be a top priority for our
country – although we might get much more bang for our buck with a
properly funded and available to all voucher system just like France &
Sweden have – I’m curious to know if this study did apples to apples
comparisons.For example, how do Japanese American kids compare to
kids from Japan or Finnish American kids to kids in Finland?
Re: "The ten best educated states all went for Obama."Your
"study" was based on percentage of the state's people with a
four-year degree. No educated person, at least one without a disingenuous
left-leaning bias, would accept graduation from an overpriced, underachieving,
socialism mill as the sole basis for determining levels of uneducated or
illiterate populations of a state. Nor would anyone but an arrogant liberal
academic equate college degree with level of education.My thinking,
along with that of the vast majority of real people, is spot-on. Shoveling money
to teachers and their unions simply won't -- CAN'T -- solve
America's education problems.Liberals, on the other hand, might
want to be a little more circumspect before accepting as true the disingenuous
talking points bouncing around in academic and trade-union echo chambers.That's what genuinely well-educated people do.
Roland Kayser,How did you rate the "ten best educated states"?
References please.Based on per-pupil spending? (as liberals seem to
think that is the best measure of education). I think it should be based on
how much the students learn (which can only be judged by standardized tests like
the ACT and SAT).Utah students ranked HIGHEST in the nation in ACT
scores in 2013 (and I'm pretty sure Utah didn't vote for Obama).
That kinda disproves your statement. If you don't believe
me... Google "Utah students ACT scores rank highest in nation"... There
was an article in the DesNews just this August. This is a quote
from the article... "SALT LAKE CITY — Utah's high school students
earned the highest ACT scores in the nation in 2013 when compared with states
where all students take the test, according to figures released Wednesday by the
State Office of Education"...How do you explain that?We get the highest ACT scores... but you put us in the LOWEST Educated State
category???We DID vote for Romney... so we MUST be stupid... right?
Government and outsiders can't force people to get a good education. I
think people in America CAN get a good education (IF they want one) and yet
still many don't. When a good education is top priority for the person
getting the education... they will work and get educated (even if there are 35
students in the class). If they DON'T want an education... no matter how
much the government wants them to get it... they wont (even if there are only 20
people in the class).We have to admit that there is an element of
individual responsibility here. In Utah you can get a good education if you
try. You can also avoid getting an education IF you try to avoid it.The government can't force Americans to get a good education if all they
want to do is get out of school and play video games or hang with their home
boys, knowing if they don't make it they can always rely on the Government
to take care of them. And if that doesn't work... they can sell drugs like
their friends and make more than their high school graduate friends.
To procuradorfiscal: The ten best educated states all went for Obama. Nine of
the ten worst educated states went for Romney. Your thinking on this issue seems
to be backwards.
Re: "Until we as a nation respect teaching as a profession, and pay teachers
adequately to attract the best talent . . . ."Spoken like a true
UEA/NEA union boss.Suggesting that American educational problems
would be solved if we just worshiped teachers more fervently, and shoveled ever
more money at them and their gritty, greedy union is simply disingenuous.In fact, suggesting that Americans tend towards illiteracy is also
disingenuous. It's really only liberals and the low-information America
they advocate and cultivate.Why become educated when nanny-state
liberals promise to take care of you from cradle to grave? It's lots more
fun to hang out and play violent computer games or basketball, interrupted only
by the gang violence and casual sex you learned in third grade.Don't worry about working. Even less about supporting and nurturing
children. Those same liberals that preach free lunch [and health care, cell
phones, and retirement] will take care of you and educate your children, just
like they did you.All they ask in return is your freedom.
Interesting that all the comments so far associate the words "education"
and "children." Education is not a process that ends at the age of 18
or 22; it is a lifelong pursuit. Too many adults think that once they complete
their years in school, they can quit attempting to learn new things. In anonymous surveys, the vast majority of American adults will admit that
they have not read a book since they left school. If we want
children to value education, we need to show them that we do. That means
continuing to expand our own minds.
And we want to blame teachers for this mess as well, I am sure. Until we make
education a priority in our country, and with all the pundits saying we do, then
we are going to continue to put out an uneducated population. But we don't
consider a quality education important. Teachers are forced to teach to a test.
Teachers are forced to make special considerations for little Johnny and Susie
because they don't want to have to work hard to learn. I see it everyday
in education. It is frustrating. Maybe I should move to Australia after all.
Quality of education depends on those most directly involved, i.e. the parents
and the child. Caring parents will see that their children are educated, even
if they have to home-school that child. Children who care about education will
learn. Teachers are an asset, but they are not the solution. We have tens of
thousands of "qualified" teachers and millions of children who are not
being educated. Some European countries could be used as a model to
help us discover what we need to change, but we don't have to go to Europe.
We have many fine schools in Utah that do an outstanding job of educating our
children. We have many parents who are doing a fine job of home-schooling their
children. We have many fine teachers in under-performing schools who could do a
much better job if they were allowed to teach.It's not just
about jobs. Our nation is at stake. Uneducated and under-educated people
believe "leaders" without checking facts. No country can survive when
the "leaders" depend on the people being too ignorant of events to know
that the country is failing.
"Americans are not the most educated people on the planet"...the context
of this statement in the article was as if the statement is a surprise somehow.
Seriously? There is an Op Ed piece on CNN about this study ("We're Too
Dumb") which points out that many adults lack the basic skills necessary to
gather information and solve problems, or even read a newspaper column. And we
don't recognise the problem for what it is, failing to cite education among
the top 5 concerns we have. Apparently the problem starts at the ECS level. As
an employer I see this all the time, after reading all the articles about how
Gen X/Y need to work differently and all that the fact remains that I can't
overlook the fact many cannot functionally perform basic math or even read.
If the kids don't score well (comparatively) year after year, the deficit
in adults and parents is inevitable.
The educational quality in northern Europe is definitely well above that in
America, and in Utah. The fundamental reason is that teaching is a highly
honored profession there, not tremendously different in respectability than that
of doctors or corporate executives. Until we as a nation respect teaching as a
profession, and pay teachers adequately to attract the best talent, we
won't do better. In addition, we have to provide sufficient funding for
the schools to guarantee that 4th grades are not stuck in classes with over 35
students. You cannot teach in that environment. It becomes day care, at
best.This is not the only problem. Parents need to foster a
supportive environment in the home, demanding a challenging curriculum from the
schools and making academic study the top priority for their children. Too
often parents, who may be poorly educated themselves, belittle those of higher
education, undermining the entire educational process. This may be just a
misguided effort to make themselves feel better, but it tells their children
that education is not important.