And here I thought that all you people from Utah had guns so as to protect your
selves. Or as the saying go's from the NRA and most of Utah's people
that post on here we need to arm every one. Or was it miss reported in the news
that your boys on the hill tried to pass that law? And where is all the posts
from gun owner's that they could have and would have taken him down? Like
they were posting after the theater shooting in CO.? Or maybe there just a lot
of hot air? And don't you know that a good guy with a gun will stop a bad
Incomplete information in this story. City Creek is a business, not a church.
Just exactly who are the plaintiffs?
TV rights and book deals are now clearly under first claim by this suit. Even
the lawyers get feed second, what is wrong with that plan?
No doubt he has $300,000 or more in the bank. The restraining order I can
understand. The rest makes no sense. The attack didn't happen.
Let's all be grateful.
@A Guy With a Brain"Yep, you're right. Don't do
anything and let the man kill defenseless citizens."Where in my
original posting did I say he should not be prosecuted and punished? Please
read it again.
Actually, according to a statement made by Taubman, they actually own the
retail buildings at City Creek Center, and also own two parcels of land under
the two restaurants that are open on Sunday. The other retail buildings are
built on property that is owned by City Creek Reserve, Inc. (which is owned by
the LDS Church), but is leased by Taubman under a long-term lease agreement. The
shopping center is "owned" by Taubman. It is similar to Park City
Mountain Resort and Powdr Corp. which owns the buildings, and equipment at their
resort, and part of the property, but has leased a large portion the land from
Taubman operates the center; City Creek is owned by the LDS church.If not owned by a church, there were be no crazy "can't be open on
Sunday or serve alcohol" rules.
Wow, such compassion from the Church for a mentally ill man.
Just to clear things up. Taubman is listed as the Owner/Operater of City Creek
Center, which is the retail portion of City Creek. They are likely the ones
that filed the lawsuit, not the LDS Church.
@ CHS 85 - Sandy, UT - "Yep. Sue the sick and penniless man. That'll
show him. He doesn't need treatment. He doesn't need compassion. He
needs to be sued. Criminal prosecution isn't nearly enough. /sarcasm
off/"Yep, you're right. Don't do anything and let the
man kill defenseless citizens.Sarcasm "Off"....
I agree with Wookie. What do they want...their shopping cart back?
Totally inspired move.
cjb, my thoughts exactly, where will the money come from. at most the
restraining order, and will it really stop him. it seems like he needs a padded
Blood from a stone...
Yep. Sue the sick and penniless man. That'll show him. He doesn't
need treatment. He doesn't need compassion. He needs to be sued.
Criminal prosecution isn't nearly enough. /sarcasm off/
The will probably get the 4000 feet part of what they want, but (this is just a
guess), he doesn't look like he has much money.
Though not Mormon, I fully support this action.I don't think
the mall or church itself should simply not stand up for itself because it is a
religious organization.They are right that much negative attention
was drawn and people may very well be more scared to go there now.I
support the Mormon church in protecting what is theirs, even their financial
assets. No problem whatsoever.