Quantcast

Comments about ‘Making a killing or getting fleeced? Differing accounting models muddy student loan debate’

Return to article »

Published: Wednesday, Aug. 14 2013 7:45 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
carman
Wasatch Front, UT

Student loans are a blessing to some, but abused by many. Instead of living a spartan existence, too many students use their loans to live in nicer apartments than they can afford, to eat out too much, to take too many trips home, to go on expensive study abroad programs, to own too expensive of bikes and/or cars, and to generally live way beyond their means.

I saw it when I was in college years ago, and by the age of the cars that some of my younger friends and relatives have, it appears that it may be even worse today.

It is great to help make education affordable. But much of the money ends up in the hands of professors, administrators, etc., or even worse, ends up being spent on lifestyles that are beyond the students means, now and in the future. And taxpayers should not feel obligated to subsidize these lifestyles.

SME
Bountiful, UT

"Not everyone agrees. Among the resistors are those who fear that fair-value accounting will make books look bad and constrain the government from pursuing social policy through lending."

This arguement has nothing to do with the actual financial risk and everything to do with pushing political goals.

Albert Maslar CPA (Retired)
Absecon, NJ

The student loan program and President Obama touting college for everyone is ridiculous, if after college there are not jobs, let alone good-paying jobs, to support the debt. College loans help colleges become bloated behemoths with their own incumbents and tenure that like government, need ever-increasing monies to support their gluttonous growth. It is almost better to use the borrowed money to buy a going-concern business, earn a good living, and further education part-time and online. Topping the abuses off is the college graduation rate that hovers around 50% so that debt to not complete college borders on foolish. The Bible sees it that way as well, describing someone that starts construction without the wherewithal to finish the job, exposing the builder to ridicule for starting what could not be finished. The government college loan program is another failure of government thinking that individualism is inadequate, and government alone can lift people out of poverty, which itself is a very abused word in this godless culture.

RBB
Sandy, UT

All you need to do is read articles about the new luxury dorms many colleges are building. Saunas, hot tubs, pools, etc. Some collegestudents are living a higher life style than they could afford with a job. People like to complain about thw rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. It is mostly a matter of behavior. If you spend more than you make you will eventually be poor. If you save, you will eventually be rich.

Why shouldn't the government have a potential profit on student loans so that it does not lose money do to defaults. Even with the best case scenario, 184 billion over 10 years on 1, 000, 000, 000, 000 in loans is less than 1.7 percent per year. That is no windfall.

ulvegaard
Medical Lake, Washington

When I went to college, we paid about $700 a quarter (we were on the quarter system). That was twenty years ago and now tuition has increased in many places about 8 to 10 times as much. I know inflation is bad, but not that bad. The government made provisions for higher student loans to compensate for rising tuition costs and most higher education establishments raised their rates even higher.

Somewhere along the line government and institutions have adopted a new scenario. Its not about improving the community, its about the money. And that is fine if you are a competing business in a capitalistic society, but not when you are a government or a government regulated entity with the sole duty of enabling society; not controlling and profiting from it.

I-am-I
South Jordan, UT

As an accountant I find the title of this article to be very inappropriate. Very few people actually know what accounting really is and understand the complexities that are involved in determining what is value and how to objectively/numerically account for it. These so called "accounting tricks' are better defined in the article itself as "Methods" (that would be the official terminology) but using the term "tricks" is a stab at the profession. While we're at it I think it would serve us to point out the profession of choice for most of our government leaders is attorney. While lawyers are great in their own function to society might I suggest that when the majority of the tasks associated with being in office deal with making and managing budgets and dealing with fiscal policy, we would do well as a country to elect people who are specifically trained in these things. What I'm saying is that I believe accountants would make better politicians than lawyers. I really believe that the financial crisis of our country would probably be solved (if not avoided) by now if accountants were running the nation's books.

Pete1215
Lafayette, IN

The more money there is to be loaned by the federal government, the more money colleges will charge students. This is an established fact, and a problem.

EdGrady
Idaho Falls, ID

The problem is the outrageous cost of attending college. Students from middle-class families do not qualify for Pell Grants or Work Study and cannot afford to pay the outrageous cost of a college education from savings or income, so students loans have to close the gap. There used to be a day when a student could get a good summer job and that would pay for almost all of the next years college. Sadly, that day is gone. State legislatures have constantly cut funding for colleges and the shortfall has been shifted to students. Now, given the Republican Party's aversion to Middle-Class America, they want to stick it to Middle-Class students via student loans.

Say No to BO
Mapleton, UT

Just like healthcare, the more government gets involved the more expensive it is.
Cheap interest isn't the answer.

sjames
AMERICAN FORK, UT

EdGrady
Your reply is close, but still off. Yes middle-class Americans cannot afford to go to schools, but this in not due to budget cuts, quite the opposite. It is due to Federal Loans being guaranteed to go to the schools, they simply charge more because the Fed govt. gives them incentives to do so by granting outrageous loans.
If we want to end this, stop sending tax money to college administrators pockets and the cost of education will go down. I find it ironic that you would say the Rep. party has an "aversion" to the middle class when it's the left that keeps enacting policies that further burden the already inured middle class.

sjc
layton, UT

Are you kidding ?

Government accounting ?

Jumbo Shrimp ?

arand
Huntsville, u

The solution to the problem is to get the government out of the student loan program and let the free market run things. I can get a 2.7% auto loan for 72 months. If the government got out of the loan business competition between lenders would drive prices down.

Guess what happens when gov funded student loans default? We the taxpayer are left holding the bag and it will be the next big economic disaster just like the housing failure. In fact, government should get out of the education business altogether, but we know that will never happen because of the teachers union.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments