Comments about ‘BYU study shows Cinderella teams draw well in basketball's Final Four; could the same be true in Division 4 football?’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, July 29 2013 6:15 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
STuFOO
Korea, AE

This exemplifies why the BCS System and college football stinks.

A Cinderella story happened only once in college football (1984). Instead of celebrating it, the greedy created a system so it would never happen again.

EVERY other sport in the history of sports has a playoff (with more than 4 teams, which is lame.) College football votes a champion. Lame.

Oh and before all you utah "fans" claim that they were the Cinderella team, just one question...

Did it produce a NC?

that is why I love college basketball. I an live with the football thing because it is only 12-13 games and its rigged like a presidential election.

Give me basketball, where teams get to play to find out who is the best. In a tournament. Like MEN (and Woman). Not Prima donna schools who think they have earned the right not to have to play to get a championship and then cry about the unfairness of having to simply exist with "other schools."

Or have fans that have terrible teams but a proud to be part of a corrupt system.

Looking forward to Basketball a little more than football at this point.

caleb in new york
Glen Cove, NY

If the Cinderella happens too often then it will lose its luster. The power teams in college basketball have lost their luster because most of the true stars don't stick around in college basketball anymore for more than a season or 2. If Lebron had played 4 seasons at Indiana, UNC, or one of the other power schools I believe the ratings would have been off the chart to watch his power conference school play.

Chris B
Salt Lake City, UT

coming from a non-power program, the desired results aren't shocking

MyPerspective
Salt Lake City, UT

This article shines a bright spotlight on the kind of work that byu fans think is research.

Res Novae
Ashburn, VA

MyPerspective -

It may not be cutting edge research, but at least it ain't cold fusion!

Uteanymous
Salt Lake City, Utah

MyPerspective

"Cutting edge research" at the U often involves coming up with the most clever way of sneaking a brewski into RES.

yodak
Dallas, TX

First of all, let's not forget this article is about the NCAA basketball Final Four, and not about the BCS. Although I would like to think that bowl games involving non-BCS teams are more popular among casual fans across the country, there are far too many differences between NCAA football and NCAA basketball to even make a reasonable comparison. We only have opinions and assumptions.

Which brings me to another point - there's no substantiating data of any kind to back up the conclusion in the article. All we have is: "the research found the only teams that provided a significantly larger audience on a national level was the team or teams labeled as the 'Cinderella.'" I don't question the conclusion, because this is something I've believed to be true for a long time. Once the Cinderella teams are out of the tournament, most casual fans stop watching - at least that's what my anecdotal evidence suggests.

Personally, I find it very disappointing that no supporting data were presented in this article. I would like to see the numbers for myself and see just how "significantly" the results differed.

Striker
Omaha, NE

One of the big reasons people like Cinderella's is because most of the fans are from smaller schools. They want to see the smaller school do well and destroy the big schools. The cheering section is enormous. In addition, people are so sick of teams like Duke in it every year. In every case, I cheer against a big school no matter the game. I am so sick of the one-sidedness in sports that favor certain schools, so when Cinderella's come along, I HAVE to cheer. Two of my favorite teams are VCU and Northern Iowa because they took down some schools that are always in the tourney and it's so nice to not have to see their name all the way through the tournament.

wtrskiier8
Darnestown, MD

Yodak-
The data is all there, not in this article but read the published paper in the Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sport. It's statistics research so the only thing this is based off is 'substantiating data' as you put it. This article is reporting based on a published academic journal, if you want the 'exact' results they are all there.

Chris B and MyPerspective-
I'm sorry this is not good enough research for you. University of Utah doesn't even have a statistics department so you would be hard pressed to find anyone who had the skills to run the statistical models this study is based off of. According to the researchers a school like BYU would not have been a Cinderella in 2011 because they were a #3 seed so your point about this coming from a 'non-power' program aren't backed up.

This is just a write up of the published academic paper. All of your questions are essentially answered and accounted for in there.

yodak
Dallas, TX

wtrskiier8 - How did you know there was a published paper in the Journal of Quantitative Analysis? The article never mentions this - not that I can tell, anyway. I've read it now at least 3 times and I don't find the notation anywhere.

RDLV
Costa Rica, 00

re: yodak
Hit "spent a decade" in the DN article and the BYU new release gives a fairly good layman's account of the published article.

Brother Benjamin Franklin
Orem, UT

This is flawed research. Please come back and provide something of benefit to our time.

motorbike
Cottonwood Heights, UT

Very flawed research indeed. There's a major difference between a cinderella in basketball versus football. A cinderella basketball team is usually one that surprises in the very first game of the tourney and then continues to gain attention by winning up to 6 more! Without a football playoff system of at least 8 teams it will be awfully difficult to create a similar cinderella feel.

Y Grad / Y Dad
Richland, WA

motorbike
Cottonwood Heights, UT

"Very flawed research indeed. There's a major difference between a cinderella in basketball versus football. A cinderella basketball team is usually one that surprises in the very first game of the tourney and then continues to gain attention by winning up to 6 more! Without a football playoff system of at least 8 teams it will be awfully difficult to create a similar cinderella feel."

Brother Benjamin Franklin
Orem, UT

"This is flawed research. Please come back and provide something of benefit to our time."

Sorry, guys. The fact that the research, and accompanying story doesn't tell you what you want to know does not make the research flawed.

Flawed comment.

RDLV
Costa Rica, 00

re Brother Benjamin Franklin and motorbike

You two are very quick to summarily dismiss the research and conclusions of a paper published in a reputable peer-reviewed journal. The research covers data from basketball’s Final Four. I see no inference to Division 4 college football in neither the published paper in the Journal of Quantitative Analysis nor the BYU new release. They did, however, look at data from the NFL and European Premier League soccer. Brandon Judd, of DN, is apparently posing the question of whether or not this applies to Division 4 football. There may or may not be any relationship but it is an interesting question.

FatMan86
West Jordan, UT

Obscure statistics and self serving research are what you focus on when you rarely have wins against top teams.

Another thing you do when you can't compete is pound your chest about your conference membership.

Both are equally lame.

Get it done on the field or on the court. The rest will take care of itself.

WON84
PLANO, TX

"In a world where there is what is being coined "Division 4" football, would a Utah or BYU provide a boost in TV ratings if it made a four-team playoff?"

Absolutely;

Utah - won two BCS games and all of those claiming they beat a "weak" Pitt or "unmotivated" Alabama would want to see if they could indeed compete with the big boys. I for one think they deserved a shot at the title in 08' but, that's another story.

BYU - has a decent sized fan base but, also quite many who hate them and would watch in hopes of them getting stomped. Also, the old people who bemoan 84' might tune in for many of the same reasons they would Utah.

No science behind any of what I said (or behind the premise of this article really)...

RDLV
Costa Rica, 00

re:FatMan86

I am amazed at the comments about the research by Scott Grimshaw by those who have obviously not read his paper. I don’t recall anything in the paper that mentions the BYU or Utah basketball or football programs. It is not “obscure statistics and self serving research” since his results may very well have a large impact on television coverage of the final four. It appears that CBS may very well be interested in his findings.

wtrskiier8
Darnestown, MD

The article on Deseret News is not the research. All it does is briefly mention the research then pose it's own question that is semi-related and does not answer it because it can't.

motorbike
Cottonwood Heights, UT

Y Grad / Y Dad,

"Sorry, guys. The fact that the research, and accompanying story doesn't tell you what you want to know does not make the research flawed. Flawed comment."

Ok, fair enough. In that case it's simply a sloppy article meant only to persuade its audience into one vein of thought. What point is there in referencing a study and drawing parallels if theres no mention of any actual details or results of the referenced study.

Sloppy and manipulative indeed.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments