Quantcast

Comments about ‘U. students protest proposed parking garage’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, April 25 2013 9:08 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Fibby1123
Salt Lake City, UT

As a former U student, I have to completely disagree with their protest.
Finding decent parking is difficult, if not impossible, during busy hours.

Ruining the geology students' view is little sacrifice for making the lives of thousands of U students easier.

Don Bugg
Prince Frederick, MD

This doesn't strike me as an either-or situation. It seems the U could either build their proposed parking structure in another location or design it to stay low by going underground. I realize that either of those options might significantly increase costs, but the costs may be worth it in order to avoid interfering with the geology building's design and purpose. I assume the university is studying such alternatives.

Jazinator
Stansbury Park, UT

What I truly hate about people's comments is that they don't understand that this parking structure is not going to help students AT ALL. The current lot is an A lot, which students are not allowed to buy passes for. The future parking garage will be sold for more money than an A lot, approximately $200 a MONTH. Not many (if any) students can afford that. So, before you make comments know the facts.

StGtoSLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT

Parking is the one thing I do not mind being done with school at the U after next week.

Obama10
SYRACUSE, UT

Were the professors honest when they used the term,"students observe and learn science from their desks" Really? This is how they are teaching? Stare and look out the window? I used to get in trouble for this in high school, but back then the teachers called it daydreaming. Seems like an appropriate use of tuition.

dinochic22
SLC, UT

As former students, did you have an extra 200 dollars each month to spend on parking? That's what this will cost. Also they are splitting 1000 spots between north and south campus. This puts in 300 at most. That means south campus gets 700. That's not equally distributed. There are much bigger parking lots on north campus with less dangerous intersections that should be considered. Yes we need more parking but that spot is not the best spot for a parking structure.

gonefishn
Salt Lake City, UT

Even if the parking spots are more expensive there are tens of thousands of people on campus at anyone time and many will pay the price. If 500 cars are using this garage that frees up 500 spaces in other areas that are more economical. I do not agree with the change of location idea because it simply moves the issue rather than resolve it. As for moving it underground many colleges have gone far away from this as they view it as a campus safety issue.
The U desprately needs parking, seems pretty simple to me.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments