Comments about ‘7 losses the Jazz, in the end, couldn't afford’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, April 18 2013 2:10 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Brave Sir Robin
San Diego, CA

No, in the end it all boils down to two losses the Jazz couldn't afford: Larry Miller and Jerry Sloan.

Lonster
Sandy, UT

Why in the world would anyone want to look back on and relive a bunch of painful losses unless they enjoy severe mental and emotional torture? We followed the Jazz all season, remember? We know the games they should have won but let slip away ---then why on earth read this story and feel the hurt all over again?

Tators
Hyrum, UT

Recounting these "shouldn't have been" losses make a strong case for a coaching change, something that the majority of comments on Jazz online articles support. Of course any coach will have his share of losses. But allowing losses after substantial double digit leads in the second half of games will mostly fall on coaching decisions. Coaches have to know when to continue playing to win, and when not to just resorting to playing not-to-lose. Too many times this season, the leadership of this team (the coaches) didn't seem to know the difference. After having a certain group of players build up a nice lead, the coach would make a change back to his usual starters, and then stick with them, even when they kept losing the lead, and not make the necessary changes until it was too late... even at all. That kind of thing frustrates fans more than the team owners and coaches apparently realize.

Had the Jazz pulled out even 1 win from those 7 should've-been-win games, the team would now be prepping for the playoffs and this article would've never needed to be written.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments