Really? Haven't we all heard about Marie's numerous trials enough?I
used to be a big fan, but I've grown tired of her martyr attitude. Life is
tough for everyone. Marie has created many of her problems through her own
decisions. I feel sad that this amazing talent has become such a sad case.
Haven't rad the book, don't plan to. I liked their music,when they
sang, thought the comedy was juvenile and ruined their music. I cannot think of
one good think about raising your family to be popular entertainers. Raising
children to play an instrument, supporting talent as it emerges is another
thing, but I could not then nor now figure out the positive benefits of taking
a whole family's childhood and trade it for fame (as fleeting as it is) and
fortune (as it is perceived). I do not hold any ill will toward any of the
Osmonds but rather do not really care that much. All of us have had or will
have struggles. I have found out that catastrophes in our lives are interesting
anecdotes in the lives of others, and best left that way so we all can move on.
We usually don't learn from another's missteps, and promoting them
turns into self promotion. In my not so humble opinion.
I, for one, hate to see this book of hers plastered all over Deseret Book and
this newspaper holding her up as some sort of example for LDS women. She did NOT
have to work in the financial sense. She loves the spotlight and attention;
can't say that I blame her for that. But is it worth divorce after divorce?
Is it worth children losing their way?
I think Marie's mother left a great gift by keeping a journal. We can all
learn from our parents and I think that Olive was brilliant in keeping her
thoughts in writing. The only thing that rubbed me wrong with this articles was
her comment that "My mother never worked outside our home. I've always
had to work." No, Marie, you didn't HAVE to work. We all make choices.
I come from a working mother family so don't get me wrong here - I'm
not judging that she shouldn't work. I'm just saying that she chose to
Wow! How judgmental. Unless you have been through depression - postpartum or
otherwise - you really shouldn't speak. While middle or lower income women
may not drive off in their cars, they have other ways to flee: drugs (including
prescription) and alcohol come to mind. Children are left in filth and to their
own devices by mothers who don't know how to cope. Is that any better? I am
glad that Marie is in a position and willing to speak about the things that are
often swept under the rug. If only one woman is going to seek help because of
her speaking out, it will be worth it.
"She addresses the postpartum issues that drove her to leave her children
with a baby sitter and a credit card."Regular women in the lower
and middle economic classes do not have such a luxury. They simply buck up and
deal through their challenges, be they abusive marriages, financial challenges,
or even postpartum. I'm sorry that you had postpartum, but it is only your
class and privileged position that allowed you to flee the challenges of
everyday life that 99% of other women have to face while addressing their
problems. That is nothing to be proud of. Don't let your riches be a
crutch to effectively addressing your problems while still living your life.
I'm curious what gay marriage or civil unions have to do with this article?
I'm not aware of Marie's personal views on the subject, but its not
ever mentioned in the article. If she does have views differing from revealed
doctrine and counsel, the Marie and I will above to agree to disagree, and
I'll let her Bishop worry about her views.
Regardless of one's attitudes and beliefs about being gay, learning that
your son or daughter is gay doesn't make him or her any less your child or
you any less the parent. What it should do is increase your desire to understand
and strengthen your capacity to empathize with one you care about and others
I do not condone gay marriage or civil unions where aexual activity is involved.
But I'm also aware that we live in a telestial world where others have
their moral agency. While we're working towards a more celestial world,
I'm for toleration, understanding, and yes, love, of those who struggle
with issues none of us fully understand.I like to encourage those
who have differing practices in their lifestyles than mine to try to learn what
the Lord wants of them and to be obedient to what they learn. But that may
involve a lot of patience, acceptance, and endurance on my part.The
same goes for heterosexuality outside of marriage, practices against the LDS
"Word of Wisdom", dishonesty, or any other unethical or immoral
practice. True, there's a delicate balance there because of the times when
the "sword of justice" must fall. But if we want to become perfect as
our Father in Heaven is, and as our Savior commanded us, shouldn't we be
willing to try to balance justice with mercy?
I have a problem with people that are for gay marriage and civil unions when our
prophets and counselors have spoken over and over again about chastity before
marriage and definining marriage as between a man and a woman.