Comments about ‘Revised class-size reduction bill gets committee approval’

Return to article »

Published: Tuesday, March 5 2013 3:00 p.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Steve Cottrell
Centerville, UT

Notice the requirement to "reduce class size without any new money". Sounds like wishful thinking.

worf
Mcallen, TX

Means more efficient budgeting. Now less paper work for teachers, and we'll really do some improving.

Owl
Salt Lake City, UT

Is there an oversight follow up to be certain that class sizes are actually reduced?

Redshirt1701
Deep Space 9, Ut

To "Steve Cottrell" it isn't wishful thinking. We don't have to spend more money to reduce class size. There are 2 easy ways.

1. Reimburse parents for materials used for homeschooling, up to $2000/yr. Even if only 2 kids per class are removed for homeschooling that leave $4000 more for a smaller class.

2. Eliminate most non-teaching jobs at the schools. Most elementaries need 1 principal and 1 secretary, 1 librarian, and maybe 2 janators. Everybody else is not needed. In the Jr. Highschools, give them 1 principal, 1 vice principal, 2 secretaries, 1 counselor for every 300 kids, and 3 janators. The Highschools can be run similar to the Jr. High.

At the district level, get rid of anybody with the title "Specialist" in their name. District should have a superintendant, 2 or human resources people, 2 purchasing agents, a few assistants, and that is about it.

Do that, and you can get more than 60% of the money that is spent per child to the classroom.

worf
Mcallen, TX

Class size shouldn't matter!

Standardized testing will fix things.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments