What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Business
- Kennecott lays off roughly 100 workers Thursday
- US companies challenging contraception mandate
- The future of food? 3D printing moves beyond...
- Utah ranks No. 1 for economic outlook for...
- 'Mantiques' could be a ticket to more cash
- S.L. draws up airport plans
- Couples registry gets preliminary nod from...
- XanGo seeks ouster of co-founder in new lawsuit
Most Commented
Across Site
In Business
- S.L. draws up airport plans
33 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - Should we let wunderkinds drop out of...
13 - Obama opposes GOP bill on Keystone XL...
11 - IRS official to take the 5th at hearing
8 - Apple's Cook to face Senate questions...
6 - The future of food? 3D printing moves...
6 - Obama threatens veto of Republican...
6



I'm not opposed to the legislature being paid in a more equitable way. But despite what the legislature may think, the $150,000 that the change reportedly cost does mean that there is less money now in the pot for other purposes. My handicapped son has been on a state government waiting list for most of his life, over seven years. That 150k would have been enough to get several kids off of that waiting list. So the legislature should have waited until times of large budget surpluses return before addressing issues of such little importance to the overall state.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments