Comments about ‘Hatch, Lee say feds are overreaching with gun control’

Return to article »

Published: Wednesday, Jan. 30 2013 12:50 p.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
one old man
Ogden, UT

Hatch and Lee are as frightened of the NRA as they are of the Tea Party.

Too bad they lack the courage required to do what is right for America.

George Spelvin
KAYSVILLE, UT

Just because you HAVE the right doesn't mean that it IS right. The weapons-manic society we live it is out of control. The lives of dozens of innocent children and teachers are not worth my "right" to have an automative weapon, or a firearm of any kind.

I cannot rely on lawmakers in SLC or Washington, D.C. to have the moral courage to do the right thing, so I did it. I dismantled my two hunting guns, put pieces of them in garbage can each week, and now they are gone.

I know for a fact that those weapons will never be used to harm anyone. I invite each of you to DO SOMETHING to eliminate weapons in our society.

George R. Spelvin
Davis County

TheProudDuck
Newport Beach, CA

Can anyone please tell me what makes an AR-15 "assault weapon" more dangerous than a Ruger Mini-14?

Same caliber, same muzzle velocity, same rate of fire. What's the difference, and why to Democrats want to ban the one but not the other?

Bueller? Anyone?

Utah Dem
Ogden, UT

I always find it curious that members of Congress refer to the federal government as if they are not part of it and therefore accept no blame for wrong doing or inactivity.

Another Perspective
Bountiful, UT

We can solve this without trampling on the constitution.

1) First we need to get serious about providing adequate mental health care to all who need it. Health care not only should be considered a right, but we now see if we don't provide it there is a highhigh price to pay.

2) Kids need to be taught morality at home and at school. Parents should be encouraged to do this and schools should be mandated.

This problem is not a gun problem, it is a people problem, and until we recognize this and then take appropriate action, this problem will not be fixed. The criminally insane will always find a way and an other tool to kill.

Mark B
Eureka, CA

The article and comments raise a number of questions:

If current proposals are "too far" then what would be "far enough" or "just right"?

If Hatch doesn't trust "the government", why doesn't he look into openings in the House of Lords?

Who should be in charge of determining, or even defining, WHO is "criminally insane"?

How does "the government" make sure morality is taught in the home?

Since the US leads the world in per capita gun ownership, then why is it NOT the world's safest country if having more guns (the NRA mantra) makes us safer?

How much should military spending be reduced in order that regular gun owners have the edge in combat - the theory allegedly held by the Founding Fathers?

grayinutah
Cottonwood Heights, UT

In the same line of thinking, Cars do not kill people, people do. We should eliminate seat belts, safe windshields, horns, etc...

lost in DC
West Jordan, UT

old man,
Hatch is afraid of the NRA?

Why should he be - he says he's not running again.

just more hate speach from the DNC and MSNBC repeated by one old man

FT
salt lake city, UT

In defense of Orrin, I think he really believes most things he says. He just does not know what a lot of it means. I don't own a gun and I don't care if someone else does. For me it is a safety issue. I know my family is safer by not having one in the house. Thats a fact. For those people who do own a gun it ludicrous to think society can't but limitations on it. The constitution guarentees the right to bear arms but it also lets goverment put restrictions (laws) on the purchase and ownership of them. The Federal Goverment has not over stepped it's constutional right to govern and everything the lib's are proposing is also constitional. Senator Hatch needs to stop fanning the flames of hysteria and engage in a dialogue which will make our country safer.

Steve Cottrell
Centerville, UT

I don't hear anyone objecting to the more universal use of the current background check required of those who purchase guns at stores. It seems closing the gun show loophole might make it less convenient for those who don't currently qualify for gun ownership. How about making that a separate piece of legislation?

Fitness Freak
Salt Lake City, UT

Kudos to Sens. Hatch and Lee for standing up for second amendment rights!

Meadow Lark Mark
IDAHO FALLS, ID

If we restrict law abiding people from getting guns then who will stop the criminal from getting guns? And how will we stop criminals from getting guns?

Wayne Rout
El Paso, TX

I wonder why he could not understand this when he gave a gold star to the Obama court nominies.

BroJoseph
Ogden, UT

I thought Mr Hatch was Reprsentative of the Federal Government

"Hatch said it was evident from the LaPierre's testimony that the federal government hasn't done enough to enforce gun laws already on the books.

"I don't trust the (federal) government. … We're going to have to be very forceful with how the (current) laws are enforced," he said. "And I think Utah does do that."

Something doesnt add up here

mohokat
Ogden, UT

The second amendment is non negotiable. No compromise. The Military has fought many wars to defend the constitution and now many cowards will bargain away their and my rights for a feel good safety.No thanks.

JimInSLC
Salt Lake City, UT

First, enforce current gun laws, see what the effect is and then if new regulations are needed address it at that time. There is a problem, but adding new laws that also will likely not be enforced is foolishness. Don't the folks in Washington have more pressing issues with the failing economy to work on?

Doug10
Roosevelt, UT

Senator Hatch and Lee were pretty irrelevant in the past federal election and seemingly continue to be.

Instead of purporting this states gun law (which does not work) A friend of mine who is a felon was able to procure a pistol in less than 10 minutes from a gun shop.

Look at new laws that can be enforced, ie drugs and guns tend to go to go together. How about outlawing anyone with a drug conviction from owning a gun, manadatory time if they are caught.

People with guns are dangerous, trained people with guns can be helpful. We do not turn truck drivers loose in the state without competency exams, why would we do it for gun owners?

When a drunk driver runs over someone rarely is it on purpose yet we penalize them and in some cases incarcerate them, if a gun shoots someone accidentally they go free, why is that?

Years ago drunk drivers were seldom punished, but by putting laws in place drunk driver kills have been reduced by 70%, lives have been saved.

The same thing can happen with guns. Ignore lifetime politicians, use your head.

Elcapitan
Ivins, UT

America pays a price for freedom. No country can legislate morality. Many of you are preaching to the choir. Lawbreakers and criminals are out of the loop when it comes to "gun control", the rest of us defend our freedom the way we have to in this failing world.

Obama and his crowd is more European than American. The NRA supports our freedom so give them credit for what you enjoy. Wayne La Pierre knows what he is talking about. Why not prosecute to the full extent of the law those who abuse their freedom by commiting crimes using guns?
This is what you should all be talking about. Our justice system is mostly broken. Get real.

Demisana
South Jordan, UT

Will "journalists" please get their terminology right? They aren't "automatic" weapons, meaning a spray of bullets, i.e. a machine gun. Nobody is talking about those, they've been illegal to sell for many years. They are trying to ban "semi-automatic", meaning one bullet for every time you pull the trigger, and another bullet is loaded ready to fire again. Which is what almost all guns sold today are.

As far as the Second Amendment - it says "shall not be infringed". Most gun laws do exactly that. The founding fathers didn't put it in there because the deer population was out of control. They'd just overthrown one oppressive government, and wanted us to be in a position to prevent the next government from becoming oppressive.

Feel free to decide YOU don't need a gun. Please stop trying to prevent me from having mine. And if I think I need a 30 round magazine in case of a home invasion, well, that is my judgement, not yours.

But first, let's fix mental healthcare. Families can't get help for ill members, until they do something illegal. Sometimes that's way too late.

Bergbub
Midway, UT

I read with interest this article and couldn't help but feel the bias in the reporting. Is the objective of the Deseret News to only support Hatch and Lee by selective reporting? It appears so. This article failed to point out how Hatch and Lee act as obstructionists to any change in gun safety, and how they are out of step with nearly 90% of Americans who support universal backgrund checks. This article failed to cite any supporters of changes to current gun safety laws. It also failed to report on how silly Wayne LaPierre looked as he refused to directly answer the question about whether he supports universal background checks. Biased reporting from a biased newspaper. I hope the readers of the Deseret News, like those of Fox News, widen their sources and seek information from other less biased sources.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments