Comments about ‘Committee kills bill that would have allowed judges to consider fault in awarding alimony’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Gunman caught after shooting father-in-law in...
- Video: Miss Utah USA flubs answer at Miss USA...
- Ogden man shot as he knelt to pray is...
- Miss Utah USA's bungled interview creates...
- 2 others back up extortion claims against...
- NPR writer 'slightly' defends Miss Utah USA's...
- In faith communities, fraudsters prey on trust
- BYU students win Student Gold ADDY award for...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Video: Miss Utah USA flubs answer at...
24 - Animal rights group threatens Utah fur...
21 - Teen's family apologizes to family of...
20 - Attorneys for AG John Swallow say...
20 - Gunman caught after shooting...
20 - 2 others back up extortion claims...
20 - Wife's website could get Jeremy Johnson...
18 - Poll: Majority of Utahns want...
18



To bad, I think this is a good idea. If one party acts to ruin the marriage in a egregious manner then that should be taken into account. Why should a woman, or man, who commits adultery and ruins a family then spend the rest of their life getting paid by the spouse they wronged? Seems like simple common sense to me.
Current law allows taking into account fault in determining alimony. This bill will define fault as the state court of appeals asked the legislature to define fault. This does and I will belive it is dead March 14 at Midnight. Until then no bill is truely dead.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments