Comments about ‘Committee kills bill that would have allowed judges to consider fault in awarding alimony’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Man charged with killing Ogden officer found...
- Provo couple killed in RV accident near St....
- Davis County honor student arrested in deaths...
- Steven Powell can't go back to his home,...
- Police were watching, listening to Josh and...
- Common Core State Standards attract...
- 'More questions than answers' as charges...
- Josh Powell made 'admission of guilt' in...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Chaffetz not willing to take...
70 - Mia Love announces she's officially...
43 - Man charged with killing Ogden officer...
38 - S.L. draws up airport plans
33 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
23 - Search for Susan Cox Powell is over,...
21 - Gov. Gary Herbert tells Washington...
17



To bad, I think this is a good idea. If one party acts to ruin the marriage in a egregious manner then that should be taken into account. Why should a woman, or man, who commits adultery and ruins a family then spend the rest of their life getting paid by the spouse they wronged? Seems like simple common sense to me.
Current law allows taking into account fault in determining alimony. This bill will define fault as the state court of appeals asked the legislature to define fault. This does and I will belive it is dead March 14 at Midnight. Until then no bill is truely dead.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments