Comments about ‘Quick end to John Swallow investigation not likely’

Return to article »

Published: Wednesday, Jan. 16 2013 5:30 p.m. MST

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended

I just wish us law abiding taxpayers could get some of our money back.
It seems Mr.Swallow and his colleagues have taken millions to fight against
the federal government.Well the way I see it, our ROI(return on investment)is net
zero.Now we learn he and the same people are involved in cover-up and inproprieties
beyond conciousness.I think we need the F.B.I. and an independent outside source to look into all
of Mr.Swallows law firm, colleagues and consulting partners endeavers over the past 6 yrs.

one vote
Salt Lake City, UT

Follow the money.

one old man
Ogden, UT

A quick end is not what should happen. This mess requires a through, open, careful investigation by a totally non-partisan body.

John Swallow and his predecessor in the the AG's office both have very long records of questionable actions. So too, does Mr. Johnson.

It's very interesting to note that the Tribune is doing a much better job of reporting on all this. In fact, there are new allegations out this morning.

This is a great opportunity to begin rooting out some of the foul smelling antics that have too long been endemic in Utah politics.

Henry Drummond
San Jose, CA

I was surprised to read Swallow did not know about Rawle's affidavit. If that is the case, how did he get a hold of it and when?

Salt Lake City, UT

So what's all the fuss about? Sounds like Swallow barely had anything to do with this, other than referring someone to a lobbyist. Talk about much-ado-about-NOTHING! Shessh. The Manti Teo conspiracy talk had more substance than this overblown story.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments