Published: Friday, Jan. 11 2013 11:45 a.m. MST
"leave them to fend for themselves"?Yes senior, fend for
yourselves. You too minorities, and whites, and religious, and non-religious,
and straight people.Until the liberals accept personal
responsibility and demand that everyone fend for themselves, our economic
problems will only worsen
The base, of the republicon party, is the biggest abuser/user of Medicare.Elected republicons will demand those who vote for them, to fend for
themselves.So, the republicon base votes, for politicians, who cut
the throats, of the very people who elect them.Perfect.
$113 Billion over 10 years? That's only $11 Billion per year, $1 Billion
per month. That's chump change for the Obama and Bush administrations. If
I recall, all the base building going on in Iraq was costing $10 Billion a
month. The US is not an empire, bring the troops home, stop wasting money in
senseless wars, cut spending to the military industrial complex. Stop paying 6
figure incomes to the tens of thousands KBR contractors/mercenaries.
It would mean that people who are 65 or 66 years old would have to continue
working to keep their health insurance. The problem with that is that employers
absolutely do not want to provide insurance for people that age.
Since when does an editorial board become the major expert and policy maker?Oh well, I guess anything serves as an excuse for Chris B and There you
go again to spout DNC hate speech against conservatives.
Raise the age from 65 to 67? How about you raise it from 65 to 85. Shesh!
Seriously people, when will we stop attacking our senior citizens? These people
have worked hard and deserve a decent retirement. You and I deserve the same
when we retire. Of course money does not grow on trees, but find another way to
trim the cost of medical insurance! Paul Krugman recently pointed
out that gains in life expectancy are generally found in the upper class. Why
should we punish a janitor the same way we punish a CEO by bumping up the age
that they can get medicare? If anything Medicare age should be tied to income.
The higher your income the later in life you get Medicare and the lower your
income the sooner you get it.....because you ( the poor) actually need it sooner
than the rich. If we are desperate for savings how about we stop
corporate welfare, stop our endless wars and global policing efforts, and stop
foreign aid to our known enemies!
The seniors have paid their dues. How about having the healthy young ones do
Now that Obama-care is locked in, it is just a matter of time until everyone is
covered by the Govt. So what is the difference?
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments