Comments about ‘Mountain West Conference: SDSU likely will stay, creating an even more competitive conference for Aggies’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, Jan. 10 2013 8:30 a.m. MST

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Farmington, UT

Trust SDSU to be in the middle of any controversy. We all know what they had to say about BYU and then they had to eat crow of sorts in the Pointsettia Bowl. (BYU is 6 - 0 over SDSU in football during the last 6 games, by the way.) This just shows how weird it was to have a team from San Diego in the Big East.

I feel the Cougars were smart to not jump to the Big East last summer....very smart.

Chris B
Salt Lake City, UT

This means the MWC is now complete and won't be accepting any please from WAC/indy teams in the foreseeable future.

I love being in a BCS conference!

Sorry aggies, Sorry cougars. You'll just never know what it is like to play in BCS games, get BCS money, go undefeated, and be recognized as one of the big boys

Mike Johnson
Stafford, VA

After years of the Mountain West and Big East having rough parity in football, yet the Big East being an AQ conference and the MWC not, there is a certain irony of the MWC striking a couple of blows against the Big East.


I think it would be good for the MWC to have SDSU stay. Right now the MWC looks like it has a better future than the Big East. With BSU staying, the long awaited demise of the MTN (worst sports TV network hardly anyone knew about!) and the new TV contract the MWC looks better than it ever has. Certainly the MWC is already better than the PAC-12 in basketball and with the changes coming in football the MWC could also become a football power!

Farmington, UT

@ Chris B

Regarding your PAC 12 Utes, "You'll just never know what it is like to play in [future] BCS games...(or) go undefeated, and be recognized as one of the big boys"

What you will remember is two BCS Games played as an outsider, as that is the only way Utah will ever play in a BCS game. They didn't go to ANY bowl game this year, or did you conveniently forget that? And one of the reasons was that Utah State beat you. Remember that, too? But then you won't need to worry about USU or BYU much anymore...Michigan (or Fresno State) will be beating Utah on a semi-regular basis.

Isn't it great sharing a BCS conference with Colorado and Washington State, your buddies asnd new rivals? Did you have a "bowl party" to watch any of the 8 teams from your conference of champions that earned bowl invitations go 4 - 4? Or did you go "bowling" at Orchard Lanes?

Just remember that USU and BYU both won their bowl games this year. So enjoy the money because that's all you have to show for your conference affiliation. Now, get "frantic and emotional."

Morgan, UT

Chris B...

One of the big boys...ha, ha, ha. It amazes me that after the year Utah had, you still consider yourself one of the big boys. Yes, USC is a big boy among children...but there is only one big boy in the PAC 12 and that is Oregon. But every big boy has to have stepping (on) stones to look big...and Utah has become a stone.

With the year USC had, their recruiting class is starting to lose commits...and after the year Utah had, you better send each one of your commits (PAC big boys hand-me-downs) some ice cream cones and candy as they to will look for greener pastures.

The PAC 12 is the lowest rated conference among the BCS conferences and the future looks even dimmer for the overrated conference.

Utah is a want-a-bee and is failing more each year...sorry Chris B. it is just the wrong direction.

Spokane Ute
Spokane, WA

The MWC should get a BCS bid. I would like to see that happen, and the Cotton Bowl added to the BCS mix. BYU fans attack Chris B's comment, and I get that. I must say that Utah has a better chance then BYU of ever playing in a BCS bowl though. In the PAC 12 you can finish with 2 loses, or even more if you win the conference title game, and get a BCS bid. BYU would have to go 12-0 or possibly 11-1 to get a bid; and that's not going to happen. It's tough to imagine either school getting a BCS bid for quite some time; based on the last two seasons. Actually, Utah State was very, very close to a BCS bid this year. With Anderson gone, it may be a long time before they reach that point again.

Y's Guy
Salt Lake City, UT

Chris B
Salt Lake City, UT
You'll just never know what it is like to ... go undefeated, and be recognized as one of the big boys.

And, apparently, neither will you.

(BTW--can I tell you how much I enjoy your posts? They add a touch of humor to my day whenever I see them. I mean, you are being funny, aren't you?)

Go Big Blue!!!
Bountiful, UT

As loooong time Aggie I could not be more pleased for the way things are shaping up in the MWC. This will be a great fit for USU for both hoops and gridiron.

Ernest T. Bass
Bountiful, UT

The MWC is over rated and unstable. We was on ESPN 11 times last year and made huge amounts of money every time. Independence is better than MWc

Cottonwood Heights, UT

Re Chris B.

Being an independant is much better than being in the pac 12 or the MWC.

Here's a prediction for you Chris:

Utah State will win a conference title in the MWC before the Utes win one in the PAC12

Cedar Hills, UT

Spokane Ute nailed it.

Providence, 00

Oh POOR little Y FANS.....LOL..... If you truly think that being INDY is better then being in the PAC 12 you know nothing about College Sports. Yes there are benefits to being indy for sure, if your ND. But if you are the Y! Then 2 games lost and your season is pretty much a loss....National Champ hopes I mean. I know it's hard for everyone to admit but Utah is in a great place. I'm not a UTE fan but I'm realistic. And I saw someone say the Pac 12 is one of the weakest? Really? Clearly you have no clue also. Ranked teams this year just in FB-USC, Oregon, Oregon St.,UCLA, Stanford....just to name a few!!!! Keep telling yourself the Indy is a good thing and keep hating on a Pac 12 school....LOL 2 of which got pay days for BCS games! Oh and they also WON.

Johnny Triumph
American Fork, UT

MWC is amazingly still relevant. By giving Boise what they did they're keeping a strong conference together. It's unfortunate that they should have given a similar deal to BYU in order to keep the Cougars in the league...

Johnny Triumph
American Fork, UT

@SpokaneUte seems to have forgotten that the BCS will celebrate its last year this season...and that the Cotton Bowl is part of the new 4-team playoff structure. Spoken like a true Ute?

Spokane Ute
Spokane, WA


It seems you have jumped to conclusions, that at this time are not fact. The only bowls settled in the new playoff format, are that the first year the Rose and Sugar will be the semi-final bowls.

"Three of the six access bowls have been determined — Rose, Sugar and Orange — and the other three have yet to be named, although the Fiesta, Cotton and Chick-fil-A bowls are the leading contenders."

Popping off without having your facts straight. Spoken like a true Cougar fan?

Phoenix, AZ

As a Coug fan, I have to say that Spokane Ute hit it on the head. BYU has to be undefeated to go to a BCS bowl (or whatever they will call it next year). I don't even think a one loss season would get BYU into a big bowl unless that loss was to a very good team late in the season, meaning that BYU would have been ranked in the top five before the loss. Remember 1996 when BYU got drilled by the Bowl Alliance.

And.....tough games late in the season are hard to come by (except for 2013). So the scenario of a one loss BYU team going to the BCS doesn't ring true to me. I hope I am wrong.

I do think USU is on the rise and I hope the new coach can continue the program on that trajectory. I was the black sheep in the family that went to BYU, so I have a soft spot for USU.

Phoenix, AZ

I don't necessarily agree with Ernest. BYU's independence is giving what it was designed to give - exposure and control. BSU now has the benefit of exposure and at least a pathway to a regular BSC like bowl as a part of the 'best-of-the-rest' conferences.

BYU has the exposure and control they wanted, which I applaud them for, but the only certain pathway to a BCS (big bowl, whatever it will be named) is to be in the top four; meaning an undefeated season. BSU can lose a game, win a conference championship and still be the 'best-of-the-rest.'

Payson, UT

Providence, 00

Ranked teams this year just in FB-USC, Oregon, Oregon St.,UCLA, Stanford....just to name a few!!!!

Just to name a few?? You named them all. And only Oregon, Stanford and Oregon St are still ranked. The MWC had 3 ranked team as well. Boise State, SJSU, and USU. Just saying.

Providence, 00

Shorts I completely agree with you. I thought Arizona was ranked for a bit and 1 other team. Either way. I think the MTN West should take the Big East auto bid. If that is even happening anymore with the playoffs. I follow College ball but that one got away form me. I think it's funny they are only taking the top 4 when they could easily have a 16 team play off! They didn't play the NC for 6 weeks. There will still be arguments. I was just stating I thought it was funny someone said the PAC was one of the weakest.......such a dumb comment.....

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments