Comments about ‘Collaborative consumption on the rise around the world as experts debate how large the practice will grow’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Business
- How colleges take from the poor, give to the...
- Mistake or miracle: New evidence on the...
- Can't catch a break: America lags behind on...
- Delta ups ante in battle for N.Y.
- Low US energy prices make Euro leaders see green
- Some unions angry about health care law
- Utah ranks No. 1 for economic outlook for...
- Republican student loan bill passes US House
Most Commented
Across Site
In Business
- S.L. draws up airport plans
33 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - US companies challenging contraception...
20 - Should we let wunderkinds drop out of...
13 - Obama opposes GOP bill on Keystone XL...
11 - IRS official to take the 5th at hearing
8 - Obama threatens veto of Republican...
7 - Utah ranks No. 1 for economic outlook...
7



Sorry folks, "collaborative" will never be bigger than the industrial revolution. The industrial revolution produced things, "collaborative" produces nothing, it just moves goods around, great idea and something Americans have been doing for decades, but it will pass if the economy every improves.
As the article mentions, the idea is not new. It is simply being adapted and adopted by a computer-enabled generation. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
The real difference is found in analysis of the meta-neighborhoods this sort of approach engenders. The danger is (as we teach our kids) you never quite know who is on the other side of the computer chat. Cyber-communities lack the subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) clues that traditional human contact brings with it. Thus, our interaction with each other is rarely as deep and fulfilling on-line as it is in person.
Cyber communities create a sense of being alone-in-a-crowd. But so does "hyper-consumerism."
The waves rise, crash and fall. But the sea remains. Trends rise and fall. But our basic need for honest, true and deep connection with each other remains.
So if I hear about it on FOX news it's proof that communism is taking over the world right? You can't have 100 bicycles used 80 percent of the time, we must have a bicycle for every person used 1 percent of the time. Good ol greed efficiency model.
@Screwdriver
Don't really understand yours analogy,
nor your hatred for Fox news, must be a liberal thing.
But I would rather live in a world or country were anyone can get a bicycle if they choose, and use it as little or as much as they wanta nd can share it or not share it at my choosing,
that is capitalism,
Not in world or country were everyone is forced to use a bicycle, or one where I am forced to share my bicycle, or one where one is not allowed to own a bicycle or where government at can take your bicycle away from you at will.
That is communism or socialism.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments