Published: Wednesday, Oct. 17 2012 8:00 a.m. MDT
This is silly. And it's going to make scofflaws out of the lot of us.
Seems like the SCOTUS would be able to look at this and realize it doesn't
pass the smell test. I don't think they will make a decision that will
outlaw yard sales - a bit too draconian, even for them.
I'm sellin stuff anyway...the masses won't stand for that!
It seems the textbook company created the problem when they sold the same
textbook for a different price somewhere else. University bookstores, in the
U.S. at least, have long taken the blame for expensive textbooks. However,
it's an outdated business model on the part of the publishing companies
that has created this problem. Before the tablet age, having to print and
release a new textbook every couple years was understandable, albeit expensive
for students, to keep things current. Given the introduction of the
digital/tablet age, however, the cost of publishing and updating content for
textbooks should present a legitimate business case for more level pricing
around the world. This case before the Supreme Court may then be unnecessary and
avert the fallout of unintended consequences.
Wow, what an impact that would have on commerce in America! You can only sell
items with permission that may ask for a percent of the sale?At
least Americans would probably stop buying things they don't need!But for me it sure would make Canada look more attractive!
Yard sales help in recycling as perfectly good items that one person
doesn't need anymore can be used by another instead of ending up in a
landfill and forcing the other person to buy the item new. How would this be
enforced? I'm telling you, for example, the Fresno PD have bigger fish to
fry than cracking down on yard sales!
Why do nine people get to decide whether 300 million people may or may not have
a garage sale?
Another reason to buy exclusively "Made in the USA" products?
Don't believe the media hype. There is no possibility that the Supreme
Court will outlaw garage sales. They probably granted cert specifically to slap
down the appeals court precedent.
it is the way things are going capitalism out of control and its going to get
worse since super pacs can do as they like but never have to pay for lies or
This is really really really funny. A journalist who works in the domain of
publishing, can't detect the difference between reselling copyrighted
materials that have distribution agreements vs selling your old Ford. Good
grief, this guys wasn't selling his personal used text books, he was
creating a grey market for new, never used copyrighted materials. To the comments about different pricing in different countries, the Bush
administration pressed forward a law the made it a criminal offense for
Americans to buy US pharma products in Canada because they were cheaper to buy
there than in their own country of origin. This happens all the time. Prices
around the world sometimes are higher then here, and sometimes lower than here -
largely based on the whim or the manufacture. Lets not get all
excited by an article that was agin purely written for shock journalistic
intent, and really left huge holes in the understanding of the law being
They my be trying to find a way to tax you on the items you sell .the goveremnt
wants their cut
fresnogirl:[How would this be enforced? I'm telling you, for example,
the Fresno PD have bigger fish to fry than cracking down on yard sales!]Cops would love this. Cops always want the easy convictions/fines over
the hard, dangerous ones. That's why they love marijuana laws, they can
bust harmless users, burn unattended grow fields, and pretend to have
accomplished something in their annual reports. Of course, they also take bribes
from some of the drug dealers to notify them of busts, or, even, to bust their
competition.Most cop are lazy cowards, this is right up their alley.
Busting some old lady having a garage sale is safe, easy, and they can get their
Christmas shopping done early by putting all her for-sale stuff, and even some
of the stuff that wasn't for-sale, in the evidence locker and then
accidentally "losing" it.You can't spell
"corruption" without C-O-P...
"Most cop are lazy cowards"Really..... dang!BTW - the police don't enforce revenue issues..... but hey, what ever I
guess. Peace, Love and Rock and Roll.
The problem I see for this man is he was not selling a used product on a casual
basis. He had a business going selling new textbooks. He bought while paying
taxes at that time? If so he is not required to pay taxes again is he? Why they
have brought used items into this makes no sense. Did he actually claim he used
1.2 millions dollars worth of textbooks himself? As far as copyrighted
materials. Does this mean we can not sell our old books? My understanding was
the copyright extended to the royalties on the book the first time it sold.
After that the buyer could resell so long as he doesnt make copies to sell since
the royalties was already paid on that book.If they change the reading of
the law on copyright it is going to cause unending problems, if enforced, but
will be ignored by most people.
Think of what this could do to The Salvation Arm, Goodwill, and Deseret Ind.
However good for the guy that made the 1.2 Million Dollars. It is your right to
sell something for more then it cost you to buy.
I will stop buying and selling and just barter. I have some old text books that
I will trade for that worthless fifty dollar bill that is burning a hole in your
Is it too much to ask for the reporter to include the name of the case
(Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)? A link to the decision that is being
appealed would be even better, but at a bare minimum any story about a court
case at this level should include the name of the case.
I agree. What is the name of the case so we can track it? This seems totally
Wouldn't the problem have been solved in the first case by changing import
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments