Comments about ‘Jim Matheson, Mia Love trade familiar barbs, sidestep questions in KSL debate’

Return to article »

Published: Tuesday, Oct. 2 2012 1:55 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Furry1993
Ogden, UT

Matheson is substance. Love is fluff. Matheson speaks for ALL Utahns, not just the far right extremes. Love could care less about a person's positions unless s/he is a member of the far right extremes. It's too bad a lot of people can't tell the difference. Matheson is the candidate of quality and substance. Love has neither.

dumprake
Washington, UT

I don't know who writes the headlines, but "gay rights" was a footnote in this "discussion." The headline is deceptive. The article focused on lobbyists...oh right, but that topic is not nearly as incendiary as so-called "gay rights." Nobody cares about gay rights, it's a fake, conjured right. Gays have every right of every other American--do they need more than everybody else?

Still Blue after all these years
Kaysville, UT

Thank you Doug Wright. one of the burning questions is about gay rights. right. We are $16 trillion in the hole, we are becoming socialist, we have corruption in government, Obamacare and terrorists. and that's what Wright asks about? The only group worse than Obama is the media. Mia Love will bring so much attention to Utah that will help us, it will surprise us all. Plus, when push comes to shove, Matheson supports Obama and Pelosi.

jpjazz
Sandy, UT

Matheson is going to lose. The strategy of attacking Love's record as mayor is poorly conceived and unconvincing, especially when the residents of Saratoga and the surrounding communities largely support her record as mayor. Unlike Matheson's neighbors, Love's supporters are in her district and can actually vote for her.

Ironically if had stayed in the 2nd district where he resides, he would be running against Stewart whose primary debacle would have made easy prey for a veteran law maker like Jim Matheson.

Lesson: When approaching the grocery checkout, pick a line and stay with it!

firstamendment
Lehi, UT

How novel, a politician who plans to actually ask us, The People, how we feel about something, what is working and etc. This is exactly what we need!
MAtheson is not change, it will be more of the same. He's already shown us that he supports Obama's agenda.
I'm not sure why the liberal comment activists are smearing Mia if Matheson supports traditional marriage also, but I suspect that they hope he will continue to support Obama in pushing his agenda.

Matheson has been in power far too long, and it really bothers me that Romboy seems to favor him, and I'm still waiting for the apologies from Doug and Matheson for not denouncing or apologizing for Matheson, Liberals, Mother Jones, etc and their dishonest efforts to get Matheson elected, dishonest attacks on Mia's record, and dishonest attacks on her family's immigration status etc. Matheson denies involvement, but clearly the smear campaign, the racism, the intimidation, and so on are on his behalf.

Rifleman
Salt Lake City, Utah

rE: Furry1993 Ogden, UT
" ...a member of the far right extremes ...."

Today's far right extremes are yesteryear's far left liberals. As our world and nation tilts to the left those who believe in traditional values have been given the bogus label as being "far right".

The truth is that we just believe in the same principles of morality and decency that your grandmother did.

atl134
Salt Lake City, UT

@dumprake
"Gays have every right of every other American--do they need more than everybody else?"

What do you mean more rights? Oh, you're one of those people who thinks that current marriage law is equal because men can marry women and women can marry men, aren't you? So if gay marriage is legal, how would that allow them to have "more" than everybody else? As a straight guy I could enter in a gay marriage too. I wouldn't but... if you think current law is equal, then allowing men and women to marry a man or a woman is equal too because it'd be the same standard across the board, just with gay people not using the straight marriage option and straight people not using the same-sex marriage option.

Republicantthinkstraigh
Anywhere but, Utah, Utah

The posters on here would make you believe the Rupub's are running a fair and honest campaign with only policy proposals and no mud throwing at the Dem's. The complete opposite is true however. No new ideas, no transparency (Mitts taxes), and nothing of substance. Don't get me wrong, I know the Dem's are slinging mud too but for you to call out Matheson and the Dem's is completely hypocritical. You can't have it both ways. And what about Chaffetz not living in his district? Doesn't seem to big of a deal with him but when it comes to Matheson, he is wrong and should live in his district. The blatant hypocrisy is appalling.

Fred44
Salt Lake City, Utah

If Love wins its about gerrymandering a district not about sending the best most capable person to Washington. Her debate performances have been less than impressive if you are looking for substance, concrete ideas, and knowledge about the job she is seeking.

If you like tea party talking points and will vote R no matter what, then Love is your choice.

atl134
Salt Lake City, UT

@firstamendment
"I suspect that they hope he will continue to support Obama in pushing his agenda. "

Continue? Not at all. As a liberal I hope Matheson could merely begin to support Obama in pushing his agenda. At least if he loses he'll have 2 months of lame duck status where he can vote without worrying about electoral consequences.

Happy Valley Heretic
Orem, UT

I find it amusing that people actually don't understand how a debate work,s and then congratulate someone for not answering a single question. If Utah sends Mia they'll get what they deserve more of nothing from the Tea Party, in a state where drinking tea is prohibited.

Mia doesn't understand even the basics needed to represent Utah, but that's OK she's gunna do and say everything the GOP tells her to do, just like mitt, No substance just slogans.

ICareAboutUtah
West Jordan, UT

Some of the comments that are being made so far actually are assumptions rather than what is actually happening. I have had the pleasure of having Congressman Matheson come several times to my business to find out actually what the needs of the community are. I know first hand that he always asks for input so he can better make decisions that affect each of us. He always has put Utah first and cares about people. He does not concern himself with what party you are affiliated with. He truly listens and has worked hard over the years to put the needs of Utah first. Please look at substance rather than politically based partisan attacks that do not tell the story of who Congressman Matheson is.Anyone that has met him knows that he will always put Utah first.

Flying Finn
Murray, UT

@ Fred44
Republicans aren't any prouder than the democrats who will be more than happy to take a win by hook or crook. You don't think states back east do a little gerrymandering to benefit the liberal cause?

Ballplayer
Spanish Fork, UT

I believe that Matheson is honestly and truely sincere when he says he puts Utah first. I think Love would honestly make that same claim. But the issue is not their motivation, it's their political philosophy. Matheson thinks that Utah is helped by government involvement in our lives. The problem is that most of Utah (although we'll see if that includes most of the 4th district come election day) do not feel that way. Most of Utah would rather have less government in our lives. I don't really care if either one of them THINKS they are doing what Utah needs, I care about them actually DOING what Utah needs.

Flying Finn
Murray, UT

@ Happy Valley Heretic
Mia Love may not have all the knowledge today that Jim Matheson has acquired over the last 12 years in Congress but 12 years from now Congresswoman Love will be well seasoned. You need to get used to that name because you will be hearing it a lot more after November.

shadowchilds
Taylorsville, UT

wow o at times i vote Democrat. Matheson is far from even remotely being a one. yes it was utah says is a Democrat. fact is he is only one bscause they wont allow two republican on one ticket. also this debate if that is what they call it is a joke. no hard line questions were asked of either candidate. desert news and KSL would never ask hardline question.

atl134
Salt Lake City, UT

@Flying Finn
"You don't think states back east do a little gerrymandering to benefit the liberal cause?"

What would be my home district if I were still back east had been held by a Republican for a very long time but after gerrymandering he's a heavy underdog. I think it's wrong in both cases.

"You need to get used to that name because you will be hearing it a lot more after November."

Hopefully due to accomplishing something of positive substance. I won't hold my breath though since I've yet to hear or read anything of/from her that is beyond talking points from a tea party/Ryan type agenda that would cause more problems than they solve.

sls
Columbia, MO

Matheson's response to gerrymandering? Run in a district where he doesn't even live. Can anything be more contrary to the idea of representative democracy? Utah's 4th district should retire Matheson just as we are trying to retire Obama, and for the same reason. The Democrat plan isn't working and as long as Matheson stays in the Democrat party he will be supporting that plan. He says one thing in Utah and another thing in D.C.

Liberal Ted
Salt Lake City, UT

It makes sense to retire Matheson

CHS 85
Sandy, UT

@sls in Missouri

Perhaps the rules are different in Missouri, but in Utah, a Representative only has to live in the state.

We have had a Representative for four years who has not lived in the district he represents. His district has been modified to move him into it, but because he is a Republican, he is given a free pass regarding this issue.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments