Comments about ‘Poll: Americans united against guns in churches’

Return to article »

Published: Wednesday, Aug. 15 2012 5:00 p.m. MDT

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
no fit in SG
St.George, Utah

Common sense prevails.

Cottonwood, AZ

I guess we know where the murderers are going next. Where better than a place that a victim cannot defend himself. No wonder there are so many bodies at these terrible tragedies; there was no one around who could stop these madmen by being able to fire back.

Aurora, CO

I am absolutely against a shooter going into a church, a theater, a shopping mall, a hospital, a school or anywhere a criminal with a bent for mass murder and destruction can wreak havoc. Too bad they don't agree and will do it anyway. To that end, we must be able to protect ourselves and others around us.

Springville, UT

Another agenda-driven article put out by the MSM to shape public opinion.

It's a stupid question to begin with. What truly matters isn't whether law abiding citizens prefer allowing guns in certain locations. They will obey the law regardless of the location--and the media knows this, or at least should realize this.

What matters is where killers want to strike next. Restricting law abiding citizens doesn't reduce crime. Who's going to put down the next killer?

These are important questions, but won't be addressed by the MSM because they want all citizens disarmed.

DN Subscriber
Cottonwood Heights, UT

I wonder if they polled any members of the Colorado Springs church where a licensed concealed carry permit holder security person stopped a madman bent on killing people?

It is remarkable that religious people would feel that a state passed ban on guns in churches will prevent killings, when the Ten Commandments mandate "Thou shalt not kill" does not seem to stop killers.

Also, it would be interesting to see the actual poll questions. Most people do not realize that subtle differences in wording of questions or sequence they are asked in can be used to skew the results for or against an issue.

My conclusion is that this is a flawed poll, conducted to drive an agenda.

However, churches should have the right to allow, or disallow weapons in their houses of worship, just as we do in Utah. And, if any killings take place in the "victim disarmament zones" the blame must rest with those imposing the bans.

American Fork, UT

"And, if any killings take place in the "victim disarmament zones" the blame must rest with those imposing the bans." Really? Unless you're not willing to only go to a church that allows you to pack heat, it's your own fault? That 'turn the other cheek' thing is worthless rhetoric? Nobody yet has asked the question...why does someone want to go to a church and start killing people? Maybe we should start there. We've got some problems, and apparently society, and religion, isn't addressing them very well. It's not my fault if I want to go to a church, or anywhere else, and expect not to get shot. To me, that's kind of one of the basics our society should provide.

Farmington, UT

@ spudman

Yes, lets give everyone a gun, then we're all safer. Much safer.......

Springville, UT


With that rhetoric, cops shouldn't carry guns. Same goes for national defense. What wisdom!

I guess you are too smart for us.

Afterglow Fanissimo
Salt Lake City, Utah

And I'm assuming the wackos who would want to enter a church and massacre everyone are among the poll dissenters.

Vincentown, NJ

We have proof that bans don't make a place safer: The theater in Aurora banned guns. Was it safer? The school in Columbine banned guns. Was it safer? Chicago bans guns. It's the deadliest city in the world per capita. Gun bans make places attractive to criminals - less safe.

Farmington, UT

@ MapleDon

I didn't say to not give anyone a gun, I said "everyone." How many people have been shot this past month that were innocent victims because some fool had a gun and thought the solution to whatever issue they were facing was to open fire? Because some nut wasn't evaluated properly in Colorado masses of people are going to take their weapons into thaters now. Does that make YOU feel safer? (It doesn't affect me because I don't waste my money on movies.)

Let's let the inmates continue to run the insane asylum, because the Constitution allowed for a well-armed/regulated militia! We're all safer because of that posture.

After all, weapons cost lots of money (not to mention ammo) and we couldn't quit making instruments of death for everyone to possess because the producers wouldn't gain from that. And gun shows are big business, too. Killing animals is too fun to abandon, as well. So keep it up......

Saint George, UT

Concealed is concealed....You'll thank me later.

Charlottesville, VA

It seems like churches ought to be able to decide whether or not they want to ban guns. They don't need the government to force them to; they can set their own rules for their private property.

Bountiful, utah

In my opinion, this survey only shows an emotional poorly thought out result. With the good guys armed (most of us), there is no problem at all, and they in effect are protecting everyone else. The outflying crazies will not obey the rules anyway, and this rule in effect, opens theie path to easy assaults on the unprotected innocents.

Olympia, WA

I think each house of worship is a special family unto itself, and therefore; that special family should decide if they want a gun in the House they share with God.

Medical Lake, Washington

Personally, I'm not in to guns. That doesn't mean I am against them. In a utopian society, we could probably get along with out them, but that isn't the case here. As stated quite strongly here, if you outlaw a gun, the law abiding citizens are without them, but the criminals, for what ever reason, don't seem to obey laws. And I imagine if I were a criminal intent on mayhem, I might reconsider if I knew someone could and would shoot back.

Some say that the 2nd Amendment only offers weapons to the militia. Well, in the 1700s, when the enemy was marching down your road, you suddenly became a bonifide member of the militia. Already citizens are being stripped of their rights to defend themselves. If a villain throws a punch at your face and if you swing back, you can go to jail (they'll sort out the details later in court).

It would be wonderful if we didn't have to protect ourselves. But that isn't the current reality. Until it is, we insist on the right to defend ourselves.

Cedar City, UT

Now explain it to me very carefully and very slowly. How will a law against bringing a gun to church prevent a person who doesn't care about obeying the law from bringing a gun to church?

Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: no fit in SG St.George, Utah
"Common sense prevails."

There is no issue here. Law abiding Utahn's don't carry firearms in LDS Churches because that is the law. No need for paranoia. Very few individuals with CCW permits would even want to.

Eden, UT

All of the people who think they will become heros when a shooting takes place are not thinking clearly. 21% of the police officers killed in the line of duty are killed with their own gun. Lost from a holster, ripped from their hand, and so forth. Trained police officers are better able to handle these violent situations, and still, many of them lose their lives. Trying to shoot another shooter in a crowded place is extremely difficult. The mixed up mentally that thinks an armed citizen will come to rescue is nonsense. Those that see themselves as heroic in these tragic events have been watching too much television. 31,000 Americans are killed with a firearm each year in the United States. Most are accidents and suicides. The readily available firearm is not the solution - it is the problem.

Manti, UT

Churches used to be the sanctuary that all respected, citizens, governments and criminals. Under todays morals it is just another building. If you want to keep guns or any other weapon out of churches you need an enhanced penalty for any assault that happens in a place of worship, such as, mandatory capital punishment.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments