Comments about ‘New strategy under way to measure the health of the Great Salt Lake’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Josh Powell made 'admission of guilt' in...
- Letters to family show Steven Powell still...
- Police locate West Point teen called 'person...
- West Point teen arrested in deaths of 2...
- 2 Utah high schools ranked among the best in...
- Chaffetz not willing to take impeachment off...
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Stump the Smith: Can you answer the questions...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Chaffetz not willing to take...
48 - Mia Love announces she's officially...
43 - S.L. draws up airport plans
33 - GOP delegates reject changes to...
32 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
24 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
23 - Search for Susan Cox Powell is over,...
21



Every time I talk to another Utahn, I hear about concern over the health of the GSL. NOT! Is this where our money should be spent? I'll bet on most Utahn's minds, its about number 789 of the priority list, if that high. You really have to wonder what our government is up to. They do the stupidest things, all wasting our money.
It is a big puddle of dirty, briney water. "Health" is an irrelevant concept.
I hope they look at the fluoride level in the lake. I've never been happy with the decision to fluoridate our water, and much of that water goes down the drain.
It's about time. The GSL is an amazing part of nature and should be preserved and maintained. The environmental impact on the great basis has yet to be measured and needs to be measured. It DOES impact animal life, plant life and they say even the quality of the snow.
Health of a dead lake...that's laughable!
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments