Comments about ‘Uintah Basin energy project gets OK, environmentalists sound off’

I told you these groups would immediatly renege on the agreements. They are all the same people using different group names to make them look like there are more of them. They are without honor nore are they trustworthy.

The river float through deso/grey is perhaps the best in the state. As long as the river and its wildness is not harmed I say "good job".

Sounds like a fair plan to me. (2% of the area is impacted, no fish are endangered, etc.)

Environmentalists of this sort have long outlived their usefulness. They have done and are doing way too much damage to the country with a sanctimonious attitude about their "good deeds". They need to be ignored.

Re: "Environmental groups called it a betrayal of the collaborative approach to energy extraction . . . ."

There's no such thing.

Anyone applying a "collaborative approach" is not extracting energy. They're stuck in an endless regulatory do-loop with nameless, faceless, motherless bureaucrats and cynical, dishonest tree huggers.

What a controversial for this VERY GOOD energy development? For those hypocritical environments’, every forward step for United States’ energy development is controversial, I just get VERY VERY TIRED OF THIS.

What is Interior Secretary Salazar getting out of this move? Its too good to be true

wait - the enviros actually BELIEVED something the BO administration said? That was their first mistake

Hmmmm, how can the liberals blame this on Bush? They'll try, just watch.