Comments about ‘Tenants evicted from South Salt Lake storage units’

Return to article »

Published: Friday, April 27 2012 8:03 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
mohokat
Ogden, UT

oh no! The stimulus package ain't working for these folks.

My2Cents
Taylorsville, UT

So who is paying the storage unit fees for these residents? If the state is sending rental payments to the storage units then they have a right to be there, and make the storage unit provide better living conditions and porta potty service.

The article didn't say if these people were homesteading or if the state and HUD was paying rent for storage units so the what is not said is also an issue. If the storage company is collecting HUD rent then it can be assumed the storage company is renting living quarters.

Stories and article of this kind written by tabloids should be more specific with their details and information. They leave too much out and omit too many facts.

Rifleman
Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: My2Cents Taylorsville
"If the state is sending rental payments to the storage units then they have a right to be there"

Wrong. It is the city and not the storage rental facility that governs occupancy requirements. And no, no local governmental agency will grant permission to live in a storage unit. They just don't meet the code requirements.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments