Too bad law enforcement wasn't able to track Josh Powell during his trip to
dispose of his wife's body ..... with or without a warrant.
@RiflemanSo you are in favor of the government tracking the move of
every citizen and use that information as they deem appropriate? Is that what I
read in your post?I prefer to have my activities as my activities.
If my activities cross the line, and there is probable cause, let the
authorities PROVE it to a judge and get a warrant. The police don't need
to know what corner I am standing on while I talk to my daughter about how her
day at school went.
@riflemanjust to be clear I have no false hope that you will
actually address any of my points since you never do but here we go anyway.
first off once again you are have made your self judge. jury and executioner of
Powell. Secondly do you have some secret knowledge the rest of us don't
about the time line of when he supposedly killed her and "disposed" of
the supposed body? thirdly are you suggesting that law enforcement should break
the law to enforce the law? should they just monitor al phone calls regardless
just to be sure? have fun posting your nonsense responses.
@riflemanthere you go again.
Re: spring streetSALT LAKE CITY, UT"just to be clear I have no
false hope that you will actually address any of my points"The
liberals like to pick and chose which parts of the US Constitution and
Amendments they agree with. Shouldn't I be granted the same right?Liberals like the 1st Amendment .... except where Rush Limbaugh is
concerned.Liberals hate the 2nd Amendment and do what ever they can
to restrict that right.Obama believes in the US Supreme Court .....
but doesn't think they have the right to rule on the constitutionality of
laws he is in favor of.Personally I agree with the 4th Amendment
...... with exceptions of course.Am I missing something here?
@riflemanway to prove my point, but thanks.
@riflemanjust to be clear Rush, Obama, the second amendment and
the supreme court have nothing to do with addressing anything I said. the only
part of your comment that even begins to address my comments to you is your last
statement where you apparently support the idea that the constitution should
only apply sometimes. care to expand on that idea?
Re: spring street SALT LAKE CITY, UT"You apparently support the idea
that the constitution should only apply sometimes" Liberals
support the idea that the Constitution should only apply sometimes .... and I
gave you specific examples. I think it is time that conservatives start
following your example.
@rifleman that was a very helpful post thank you. I finally understand
where you are coming from. So basically your moral and ethical compass is set by
where you perceive those that appose you are coming from or in other words where
ever the winds of your perception blow you from one day to the next. knowing
that it will be much easier to just ignore your comments in the future.
Re: George Bronx, NYLiberals don't believe the 1st Amendment
should apply to Rush Limbaugh, that the 2nd Amendment doesn't apply to our
day and age, and that the US Supreme Court has any business reviewing
Obama's pet health care law. Liberals do however think conservatives
should observe a higher standard.We refer to it as the Double
@riflemanso you lump all "liberals" into one straw man and
tell us all what we supposedly collectively think to justify your behaviors.
Interesting set of "standards" you have for yourself their rifleman.
@rifleman How persuasive of and argument do you think you can make
by accusing "liberals" of having a double standard when by your own
admission you have no standards? you have pretty well killed any credibility
you may have had to speak on moral or ethical standards.