Quantcast

Comments about ‘Governor Gary Herbert calls sex ed bill he vetoed 'solution in search of a problem'’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, March 29 2012 6:56 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
JHP
Salt Lake City, UT

To clarify, HB 363 would have still allowed parents to opt in to instruction in human sexuality, such as human reproduction, anatomy, STDs, etc., it simply would have disallowed instruction in contraception.

Just because the governor hasn't had people bring up problems with the sex ed law doesn't mean it can't be improved. Also, do public schools have a duty to provide every single type of instruction that parents might want? Should they have to provide instruction in skiing, rifle shooting, and poker, along with contraception, just because some parents want it? "Choice" should be a method for providing the best education possible, not the goal.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments