Comments about ‘Law would allow restaurants to sample wine, spirits’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Josh Powell made 'admission of guilt' in...
- S.L. draws up airport plans
- Couples registry gets preliminary nod from...
- Search for Susan Cox Powell is over, West...
- 'Mantiques' could be a ticket to more cash
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- XanGo seeks ouster of co-founder in new lawsuit
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Mia Love announces she's officially...
43 - S.L. draws up airport plans
31 - GOP delegates reject changes to...
31 - XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
23 - Search for Susan Cox Powell is over,...
20 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
20 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
19 - Gov. Gary Herbert tells Washington...
15



These sampling laws are beyond absurd. There is no legitimate reason why a rep can't bring samples to a restaurant.
It appears to be a issue of control for the sake of control. There is no other reason that holds up under scrutiny. These people are on an evil power trip.
It clearly makes sense to allow a restaurant to sample a wine before deciding to add it to their wine list. Having a wine list appropriate to the cuisine that a restaurant offers does not increase the public's consumption of alcohol. People who want a bottle of wine with dinner will go to the restaurant that offers something they like. Or they can dine at home or with friends where they will enjoy the wine.
It will, however, allow a restaurant to sell a better wine to people who will buy wine anyway. And these people might come back to that restaurant to enjoy another meal with a good wine.
People who drink will always do so. And this will allow hiring of more restaurant workers, which in turn benefits the local economies.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments