j'The signs would not replace the 14 roadside crosses the Utah Highway Patrol
Association recently removed from public property because a court found them an
unconstitutional display of religious imagery. The UHPA is refurbishing the
markers and intends to put them up on private property.' - article
Private. Property. That, is reasonable. Not to INJECT
crosses on public land... that I help pay for! The issue
of the crosses was theocracy. Not 'freedom of religion.'
This seems reasonable. Safety minded, and a reminder of a trooper's sacrifice.