This isn't right. Why isn't dinner being provided? Don't kids eat
dinner? Besides, a lot of parents are not around at dinner time so who is to fix
it? I think barry and the nanny state ought to either give everyone, parents
too, dinner vouchers or have meals catered into evryone's home or
apartment. That would be fair.
@thidThanks for making my point. Life is only sacred to conservatives and
not about the parent bitty to manage that life until the child is born then
it's no longer sacred and the parents problem.
while on the surface this make look like a good thing for the kids, but how much
parental reponsibility is being handed over to the state? In the overall grand
scheme of things, this move is detrimental to society. Beside parents
abdicating responsibility, the children learn dependence on the state.PARENTS are responsible for feeding and clothing their children, not the
@ Intervention: Conservatives think two PARENTS should raise their kids, not the
government. That's the difference! Better for the children, better for our
nation, better for the government! And by the way, its conception, not
"conseption" and yes life to conservatives is sacred. That's why we
oppose abortion on demand! You should as well.
I love conservative thinking, "the life of a child is sacred from conseption
You know what, there truly is no such thing as a 'free' lunch.
Somebody is paying for it, & that is the taxpayers.
Schools don't feed children, that's what parents are for! Schools make
lousy parents and the results will be ever more anti-social behavior from
children and their children!
montana is the next nanny state. congrats dependents! soon you can just move
into government housing complexes.
More Americans becoming dependent on their employees.