Quantcast

Comments about ‘Why airlines didn't avoid risky Ukraine airspace’

Return to article »

Published: Friday, July 18 2014 8:00 a.m. MDT

Updated: Friday, July 18 2014 8:52 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
TheProudDuck
Newport Beach, CA

Flying over trouble spots like Afghanistan and Syria, where the bad guys generally have, at most, small arms and maybe shoulder-fired, short range surface to air missiles (SAMs) is one thing. Flying over an area where a major world power, Russia, has supplied its clients with state-of-the-art heavy SAMs, is another.

The SA-17 is the equivalent of an American Patriot missile battery. It's not a little thing you sneak over in a backpack -- it involves multiple tank-sized vehicles, with separate radar, commmand and launcher tracks. This is big-league military hardware, quite possibly operated by Russian military personnel.

It was absolutely irresponsible for an airline to fly its plane into range of those things. I suspect "international authorities" have avoided issuing an appropriate Notice to Airmen out of fear of offending Russia.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments