Quantcast

Comments about ‘High court voids 35-foot abortion clinic buffer’

Return to article »

Published: Thursday, June 26 2014 10:37 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Brio
Alpine, UT

Wow. Another step in the right direction. That's 2 unanimous decisions against Obama liberals just today by the nation's highest court.

Abortion isn't primarily a medical decision, as pro-abortionists like to claim. Rather, it's mostly a convenience decision to avoid the responsibilities of parenthood at the expense of young, innocent lives. Abortion continues to be the most barbarous legal action in modern-day society. Eventually, as society advances, it will come to see and understand how inhumane and ill-conceived this ludicrous practice generally is (when the mother's health is not in danger) and once again make it illegal.

Pagan
Salt Lake City, UT

'That's 2 unanimous decisions against Obama liberals just today by the nation's highest court. '

Um, Roe Vs. Wade was decided 40 years ago.

Despite the best efforts of some to vilify our current President with every possible problem in American history, that is simply put not the case.

Brio
Alpine, UT

@ Pagan:

Roe vs Wade is not in the news today. So your comment is a bit odd.
What is current and relevant to my first comment is that the Supreme Court decided today against...
1) Not allowing Obama to make his around-Congress appointments when they are in normal recesses. And
2) Not allowing abortion clinics to restrict protesters to 35 feet away.

Try a little harder to keep up.

Mark B
Eureka, CA

Violence will come from this decision. Regret over the violence will last about ten minutes, then posters will all join in proclaiming that the victims of the violence "had it coming" because of what they had planned to do to The Unborn. Heads will nod, more will suffer and the Republican Party will add a measure to its party platform that will make it all seem just fine. Any opposing the measure will be called "RINOS".

CHS 85
Sandy, UT

Ironic that they made their decision behind a "no protest zone" of their own.

lost in DC
West Jordan, UT

MarkB,
yeah, it's a shame the violence sure to be prepetrated against the protestors will be forgotten so soon. but we all know pro-life, conservative people are not worthy of protection in the eyes of the BO minions

atl134
Salt Lake City, UT

@lost in DC
Pro-life protestors threaten patients and especially abortion doctors. Sometimes going so far as to shoot them or bomb their clinics. You completely ignore that.

Kally
Salt Lake City, UT

@brio
against Obama Liberals? A bit of a stretch considering this was a Massachusetts case and the "liberal judges" voted with the majority but please feel free to keep trying to make it an us against them thing.
With reference to the recess appointments decision I would again point out that the 10th circuit that you accused of being liberal activist yesterday and the "liberal judges" on the supreme court found in favor of the plaintiffs.
Maybe not everything comes down to oversimplified stereotypes and sound bits.

Maudine
SLC, UT

@ Brio: Yeah! Who does Obama think he is anyway! Passing laws in Massachusetts in 2007 to ...

Oh. Wait.

Obama was an Illinois senator and George W. Bush was President when this law was passed.

Why are we slamming on Obama over this?

lost in DC
West Jordan, UT

atl134
not since Bo took over.

now the right is targeted by guns BO sold to mexican cartels and by the IRS, probably at his behest.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments