Wow. Another step in the right direction. That's 2 unanimous decisions
against Obama liberals just today by the nation's highest court. Abortion isn't primarily a medical decision, as pro-abortionists like to
claim. Rather, it's mostly a convenience decision to avoid the
responsibilities of parenthood at the expense of young, innocent lives. Abortion
continues to be the most barbarous legal action in modern-day society.
Eventually, as society advances, it will come to see and understand how inhumane
and ill-conceived this ludicrous practice generally is (when the mother's
health is not in danger) and once again make it illegal.
'That's 2 unanimous decisions against Obama liberals just today by the
nation's highest court. ' Um, Roe Vs. Wade was decided
40 years ago. Despite the best efforts of some to vilify our current
President with every possible problem in American history, that is simply put
not the case.
@ Pagan:Roe vs Wade is not in the news today. So your comment is a
bit odd. What is current and relevant to my first comment is that the
Supreme Court decided today against...1) Not allowing Obama to make his
around-Congress appointments when they are in normal recesses. And2) Not
allowing abortion clinics to restrict protesters to 35 feet away.Try
a little harder to keep up.
Violence will come from this decision. Regret over the violence will last about
ten minutes, then posters will all join in proclaiming that the victims of the
violence "had it coming" because of what they had planned to do to The
Unborn. Heads will nod, more will suffer and the Republican Party will add a
measure to its party platform that will make it all seem just fine. Any opposing
the measure will be called "RINOS".
Ironic that they made their decision behind a "no protest zone" of their
MarkB,yeah, it's a shame the violence sure to be prepetrated against
the protestors will be forgotten so soon. but we all know pro-life,
conservative people are not worthy of protection in the eyes of the BO minions
@lost in DCPro-life protestors threaten patients and especially abortion
doctors. Sometimes going so far as to shoot them or bomb their clinics. You
completely ignore that.
@brioagainst Obama Liberals? A bit of a stretch considering this was a
Massachusetts case and the "liberal judges" voted with the majority but
please feel free to keep trying to make it an us against them thing. With
reference to the recess appointments decision I would again point out that the
10th circuit that you accused of being liberal activist yesterday and the
"liberal judges" on the supreme court found in favor of the plaintiffs.
Maybe not everything comes down to oversimplified stereotypes and sound
@ Brio: Yeah! Who does Obama think he is anyway! Passing laws in Massachusetts
in 2007 to ...Oh. Wait. Obama was an Illinois senator
and George W. Bush was President when this law was passed. Why are
we slamming on Obama over this?
atl134not since Bo took over.now the right is targeted by guns
BO sold to mexican cartels and by the IRS, probably at his behest.