Published: Thursday, March 27 2014 12:00 a.m. MDT
I truly hate to see these articles. I think one of the biggest issues with the
growing student loan debt is the fact that many young people do not perceive the
effect of taking out student loans until it is time to pay them back (if
deferred). Smarter money management can make a huge difference in my opinion.
I was lucky/fortunate enough to complete my undergraduate and my graduate degree
with no student loan debt. I knew what my tuition was going to be each
semester, and made sacrifices to save that amount of money up so that I had it
when it was due. When I graduated I had a mortgage, wife and baby.I see
so many people that live at home, have in-state tuition and work that have taken
large amounts (20k+) of student loans. I just don't get it.
"...perhaps inequality has gotten to the point where it's not fair when
people don't have a chance to rise, and we need to do something about
it,"This country at one time was a meritocracy where all were
given a chance to succeed. Now, unless you have stocks given to you from your
parents to sell, you cannot compete in college or the free market. We now have a
Observation about the Chevrolet vs. luxury cars---You don't know how
heavily in debt the luxury drivers are! If your car gets you from point A to B
while you're paying off debt, no big deal. And when you get out of debt,
why buy a luxury one anyway? They are expensive to license and maintain. If
your mentality is luxury, you might always be in debt.The
frustration that someone has more degrees than parents and is worse off tells
several tales. 1. He can't realize that his parents didn't start out
with everything. 2. He voluntarily choose his major and took on the debt. 3.
He needs to minimize the outflow.My college children went out to
lunch and dinner A LOT! I was appalled. I probably went to lunch twice in four
years of college and only remember going to dinner once. I simply didn't
have the money---either packed a lunch or went back to my apt.Good
financial habits reap rewards much later. While my friends and their spouses
can't afford to retire, my spouse and I are many years retired and we will
not outlive our money.Abefroman22 is absolutely correct.
Borrowing is out of hand, but much of that is based on the rise of tuition. The
example I am most familiar with is the U of U Law School. For the 2007-2008
school year, tuition was $13,210. This year, it is $23,489. Salaries certainly
haven't come close to doubling in that time.
‘$1 trillion student loan debt widens US wealth gap’Really? I'm not buying it. A college education adds to
one's marketability in the work force, hence reducing that wealth gap while
greatly reducing the income gap. And no one compelled anyone to take those loans
out. So just pay YOUR loans off yourself. I had to. And plenty of
other people had to pay their school loans off as well.If the point
of the article is to encourage citizens to have the government pay for some
deadbeats' school loans . . . FORGET IT. You've got to learn
responsibility some time. That might as well happen NOW.Yes, I can
imagine the country is full of sneaky lawyers who want the taxpayers to pick up
the tab on their law school educations. But that's NOT happening if this
citizen has anything to say about it.
the availability of student loans is at least one factor in the increase in
tuition costs. If students could not borrow, not as many could pay, and if
enough people could not pay, the cost would go down - simple supply and
demand.I have no sympathy for the student who racks up a six figure
debt to get an advanced degree in pop culture (yes, they are offered!) or any
other field of study where the chances of getting a good paying job are slim to
none.Fortunately undergraduate tuition at our local universities is
not as outrageous as at other places, public and private.I worked
two jobs during college, lived at home and commuted (thanks, mom & dad), and
paid for all my books, tuition, and fees. It still can be done.
Too many kids go to college as an alternative to getting a real job. Too many
take majors that have no employment demand. Too many do not save to pay their
college expenses. Too many waste money on luxuries (eating out instead of Kraft
mac & cheese and ramen soup diets) and fancy electronic gizmos.College costs continue to rise many times the rate of inflation, an
inexcusable scam that needs to be stopped.I have zero sympathy for
the kids who make bad choices and whine about the consequences. And for those
who want someone else to pay for the mistakes, instead of giving away their
money to help.Finally, do we really need all the lawyers that are
created by our excess of law schools? Lawyers create nothing, only redistribute
wealth created by others.
I agree with both sides here. I saw a lot of wasted money fly around when I was
in school. But tuition and fees at universities have gone far beyond what is
necessary to provide good education. If you don't go to school, your
expectations of wealth, stability, and satisfaction are less later on. So
people borrow what they have to, and Universities charge what they can get away
with. Frivolous spending needs to be checked on both sides.
GaryO,You're suggesting people pay their own loans off and
demanding personal accountability? That's a far cry from the
liberal perspective you give us on other articles. I'm happily surprised
you didn't blame student loans on rich people and start demanding that rich
people and taxpayers pay for the loans other people decided to take out.Job well done Gary
they want a bigger lower class so when factory workers go to high to pay over
seas they can bring factories back to a underclass of people they are forming in
america for the capitalistas that control this country.
-Abefroman22Appreciate your comments: "I was lucky/fortunate enough to
complete my undergraduate and my graduate degree with no student loan debt. I
knew what my tuition was going to be each semester, and made sacrifices to save
that amount of money up so that I had it when it was due."Unfortunately, those times are not these times. What was your tuition compared
to your income? I can only speak for my personal situation but I was able to
complete undergrad with no debt by scholarships and working to pay for books,
etc and living at home. Graduate school was a different story-No amount of
minimum wage work covers 35K/year tuition plus cost of living. Something has to
be done to control tuition costs otherwise wealth gaps will continue to rise.
I'm not worried about myself, I'll succeed and pay off a lot of debt.
But what about the country as a whole? How can we compete/thrive in a global
economy where their (Europe, China, India) tuition is free/reduced? I worry we
may find ourselves on the wrong side of history.
@jbikingI'm sorry, but those times ARE these times. I graduated from
graduate school last year (2013). Like I said, I was fortunate/lucky. I lived
at home until I got married, worked full time in the financial industry and was
able to pay undergraduate and graduate books, tuition, fees, and still put down
$50k on a home in my last semester. I'm not claiming that it is easy, but
it is achievable. I worked full time plus night job twice a week, and my wife
worked full time until we had our son in my second-to-last semester. I am 27
years old.I have been extremely blessed with jobs that I have been able to
attain and succeed at.
Abefroman22I'm truly glad it worked out well for you. As you can see
from the article-you are an exceptional person. The fact is that tuition has
risen much faster than wages. Your experience doesn't speak to
the broader question I pose. How does the U.S. stay competitive in the world
economy where tuition burden limit vast numbers of the population to achieve an
education? It seems to me that we succeed as a country when more and more of us
reach our educational and innovative potential. This issue is much
larger than our personal thrift habits, although these play a part.
Abefroman22I don't know where you went to graduate school, but your
experience was certainly different than jbiking's and mine. I also paid
around $35k/year to go to law school. I am not aware of anyone who is able to
go to a decent law school and concurrently work full time to pay for it. Law
firms typically won't hire you full time until you graduate, and waiting
tables won't cover $105k (just for tuition) over the span of three years.
My wife and I did what we could during law school, but still walked
away over $150k in debt. And this is typical today for law school debt. lost in DC has one of the more viable solutions. Remove the ability to
borrow as much and costs will necessarily drop. Also, remove the federal
government from backing student loans and you will have less people able to take
out exorbitant amounts of debt.
ChrisB - Thanks for reaching out.I'm all for personal
responsibility and accountability, as most Moderates and Liberals are.But very few "Conservatives" are really accountable or responsible,
even though they pretend to be. Even dirt poor "Conservatives" insist
that the highest earners should not fulfill their part of the social contract
and pay more in taxes. But that doesn't mean that poor and middle class
Conservatives are in any way noble. It just means they have been successfully
propagandized to act like faithful peons to the highest earners. That's not accountability or responsibility. It's no trait to be
admired. It pure foolishness. In defending your high-earning heroes, you are
ensuring that you and your families must make sacrifices so the rich can get
richer at your expense, and you are ensuring that the quality of life for your
children and their children will much less than what it could be. And you think that's accountability?You see what I mean about
pretense?I'm glad I could help.
GaryO-"But very few "Conservatives" are really accountable or
responsible, even though they pretend to be. Even dirt poor
"Conservatives" insist that the highest earners should not fulfill their
part of the social contract and pay more in taxes. But that doesn't mean
that poor and middle class Conservatives are in any way noble. It just means
they have been successfully propagandized to act like faithful peons to the
highest earners."Uhhh..Gary, high earners DO pay more in taxes.
47% pay NO income tax. Your statement sounds more like the
propaganda/talking points of the "progressives" of both parties who now
have the country circling the drain. T. Jefferson was correct - the govt that
governs least, governs best. And he was a democrat!
D. Jeremy-I guess it helps that I stayed in state and paid in-state
tuition...Especially when considering law school, I would hope that the majority
of people realize that it's all the same BAR exam and unless you are going
somewhere very prestigious, you shouldn't bog yourself down in debt. So
your comment about a "decent law school" really doesn't make a lot
of sense. I hope you went to Harvard or Yale for law school! I have an
individual in my family that worked while they went to law school out of state,
finished law school, passed the BAR and moved back to Utah with $15,000 in debt.
That is certainly reasonable. This person has a spectacular job as an attorney
currently. I never said that the way I did it was right, I said it was feasible
Wealth gap?Nope! Every person has the opportunity to become
wealthy.It's just that some decide to become whiners, and want
to live of others.
The root of the problem is that we value reputation more than performance. We
should have a standardized system of ability testing universally acknowledged
among employers. College degrees should be replaced with a universal competency
test. How you obtain the skills should not matter as long as you have them -
learn in college, learn on your own, learn on the job, learn in a foreign
country, or be instructed by an angel from Heaven. The applicant pays the fee,
takes the test, gets his score. Not good enough - study, practice, try again.
The cost of education will go down by a factor of 100 or more while the quality
will go up.
GaryOSo you do have a spark of conservative principles in you.
Who'd have known from your previous posts?As for the rich
people and their contributions to society. First off, I don't believe that
because someone has become a millionaire it stopped me from becoming one. Which
I'm not. And, you know that there are many many very very rich liberals
and progressives out there. Don't you think that if they truly believed
what they preached, they'd "contribute" more. I mean, when you
look at wealth earned and contributed to others, few people can walk in the
shoes of Mitt Romney. He gave away his first million, which he inherited. How
many Kennedys, Soros, Kerrys, Reids, Pelosis, ect. can say that? I find many on
the left who talk the talk, but their personal checkbooks stay closed. With 17
trillion debt, even if we taxed at 90% the people who earn $250,000 and more,
we would hardly touch our debt. We need some tax increases, but mostly we need
reduced spending and programs that grow the economy. Jobs. Going on 6 years of
Obama now.............. it isn't working.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments