Published: Saturday, Jan. 4 2014 12:00 a.m. MST
Education should be handled by teachers, parents, and school administrators.
Period!Everything else is a waste of time, and expense.
The bottom line is, will education be better more centralized or not. Will
having one group in Washington D.C., who will of necessity ignore local and
state concerns, give us a stronger educational system because it is standardized
nation-wide? Or will having each state go through the process, and comparing
against each other's successes and failures, provide a better product even
though not exactly the same? How important is it to do it exactly the same in
every state?I believe history shows that the United States is
stronger because we are made up of 50 states that are free to do things
differently. The states are laboratories in governing, where we each can
compare and contrast between what works and what doesn't. Centralization
is not the answer. No one group will have all the answers. If the whole
country follows only one group's "standards," sooner or later we
will all go over the cliff together. Diversity of thought is very important.I find it hard to understand why the CCSS supporters, who rightly reject
NCLB, think the answer is MORE of the same thing! Eliminate both!
The reporter says that CCSS is not federal and not a curriculum. Well, it is
based out of Washington D.C. It is controlled by one group for the whole
country. It is required for federal funding. That is de facto federal.What the standards are, and particularly the way the tests are
formatted, completely drives the curriculum. So to say that it is not federal
and not a curriculum is merely semantics. By everything that counts it IS
federal and it IS the curriculum for every school in America.And,
despite what the proponents say, it is no more "higher level thinking"
or "deeper understanding" than anything we were doing before. It's
merely more of what NCLB was - national takeover of what were once the local
community's schools and prerogative.
Just two of many examples why government should not be in charge of
education:* Head Start program did not lower the number of people
living in poverty.* Government has poor math skills, and cannot balance a
Champions run independent.The common collective restricts.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments