@ Mark B:Thankfully, you are not me and I'm not you.Try
to be open enough to realize I'm not representing any of the groups you
mentioned... the GOP, Tea Party, right (or left) extremists. I didn't
mention any of them in any of my comments. That's simply you reading
things into things... in an unobjective desire to label everyone... especially
those who don't agree with your ideologies. In so doing, you've
drifted off context of the article subject. I speak only for myself
and represent no one or nothing else... other than the principle of common
sense. You should try it... it's often fulfilling.
If I were Tators, I would not mention a thing about name-calling. The GOP, tea
party guys and far right radioheads wrack their brains every day thinking of new
ways to insult Obama. They do it knowing he won't waste time to
counterattack. Are they thinking? Yes - about the next compelling bumper
@ Happy Valley Heretic:Having a militarily strong Israel has been
the only means of having any semblance of balance in the Middle East for quite
some time. Cutting off our military aid to Israel would be one of the dumbest
things we could do as far as trying to maintain any peace in that region of the
world. Rogue countries in that region would then run amuck. The
prime minister of Israel is not trying to control America, but simply looking
out for the safety of his country and hoping that we will start acting like the
ally we contend we are. FYI: Stooping to name calling of world
leaders significantly diminishes your credibility.
Can you imagine if President Obama goes to Iran, gets some big agreement with
them, and comes home to declare "We have peace in our time." Why would that ring a distant but familiar bell?
The Obama administration has already "bought" into a deal with Iran
emotionally. Their vision is clouded with their utopian philosophy distortions.
They want the deal badly to bolster a horrible 2nd term and are willing to give
up too much to secure a deal with Iran.Unfortunately, Iran cannot be
trusted and Obama is throwing an historical friend, Israel, to the wolves.
Our administration has turned soft after the way their Syria debacle worked out
so poorly. Israel is a longtime ally. Iran is not. I don't blame
Israel's leadership at all for being disappointed with the current results
of the most recent talks with Iran. Every freedom loving country needs to stand
up for its own security. And in Israel's case, it's very existence.Obama is proving to our allies that they can no longer count on us when
the chips are down.
So, if Israel does attack, where will Obama stand? Support them? Try to stop
them? Or stand on the sidelines? Think about those choices.HemlockroidI didn't realize that Laird was an anti Israel.
The term Zionist is usually code for something like anti Israel or Jewish.
As Defense Secretary Melvin R. Laird wrote in March 1969, these "Zionist
developments were not in the United States' interests and should, if at all
possible, be stopped."
Cut Israel Off and see how big they talk, Tired of Nutty Yahoo trying to control
America and start a war with Iran.Time to cut apron strings and the 2
billion welfare we send them every year.