Basically these four legislators said that they would be happy to let America
fail as long as President Obama gets the blame. Patriot is not a term that one
could apply to any of them.
I find this extremely funny since we all had to endure the endless rantings
about how when Obama was in the Illinois chamber he voted present (no vote)
several times. Oh how the far righties had a heyday with that. It was proof he
shouldn't be a leader. It will be interesting to see the
justification behind these lack of votes. Particularly from Lee... with all his
principles and all. If should have stared true to course, voted No against the
CR and the cap increase. He was all bluster when no shots were being fired, but
when the actual fight came to him, he was no where to be found. He had left his
Republican colleagues to make the hard choice.... his choice... to not make a
choice. Shameful seeing how he is one of the principles who
started the fight. You don't throw the first punch, then walk away,
leaving someone else to clean up your mess. Place the dang vote.
Whatever happened to government for the people by the people?I read
poll after poll from BYU and KSL how unpopular the shutdown was. All the polls I
read showed that a majority here in Utah did not support or agree with what our
state delegation was doing. So only a very small minority supported them.
Yet...Why then was our state delegation catering to the minority and
ignoring the majority?Could it be because the minority are the
delegates for the caucus system? Could it be that our state delegation was
catering to those who control our caucus system rather than adhering to those
who they're supposed to represent?Just another prime example of
why we need to "Count me Vote" and rid ourselves of the corrupt caucus
system. It merely breeds radicalism and extremism. Time to give the
majority a voice! Let freedom ring!
If you don't intentionally do something, you unintentionally cause bad
things to happen.
They all jumped onto the Tea Party sinking boat.
A solution is at hand if the people of Utah will rise up and vote against their
republican masters long enough to make voting count in Utah. Although there is
no guarantee that democrats would give people the right to elect the government,
the chances are slightly better than with the republicans.
i think they did just fine you all need to quit attacking the republicans and
stand for what is right and true the true enemy is democrats who want to keep us
in debt you ppl need to wake up we will default sooner or later you cant spend
like they been spending
Four members of Congress from Utah had the courage to NOT kick the can down the
road. Four members of Congress had the courage to NOT let Obama and Reid
dictate terms to the House. Four members of Congress kept their oath to protect
the Constitution.Those who are beating their chests over the fact
that we did not default seem to think that doing nothing means something.
Exactly what was done? Obama's credit card was renewed. That's all.
There is no budget. There was no compromise. The whole mess has to be repeated
in a few months.Apparently, that's what the liberals want -
continued chaos. Four members of Congress wanted to solve the problem NOW.
Embarrassments, all of them, No alternative, No ideas, No votes, No character,
next election No jobs."the true enemy is democrats" funny,
sad, but funny. The republicans really needed the red menace to focus their
collective hate upon or they start calling everyone one else "the
enemy." "Four members of Congress wanted to solve the
problem NOW." with continued chaos, ignorance, and grandstanding, not
Brad, RolandThe idea that the US would default on its debt was a scare
tactic created by the DNC, peddled by a lapdog media, and swallowed by a
gullible public.I assume that if you are employed and get paid more
than once a month that you received at least one paycheck during the dem-forced
shutdown. Did you not have taxes withheld? There is more than enough revenue
coming in to meet all the debt service requirements. The only way there would
have been a default was if Lew ignored the constitution and spent the money on
other things before servicing the debt.Bob,The answer is at
hand if the American people will rise up and vote against their dem masters.And all you lib apologists seem to ignore the fact that the house voted
to keep the government open – BO and the dems voted to shut it down. The
shut-down was purely a dem creation.
Great letter. These guys can go through an entire term without a single
accomplishment, and yet still get re-elected by constituents who only care to
hear about their "principles". We Utahns will vote against our own self
interests time and again!
To lost in D.C.: Every single bill submitted to the Treasury represents funds
that were legally and lawfully appropriated by Congress. Failure to pay any of
them constitutes a default. What you suggest would be like saying that as long
as you make your house payment, you can stop paying your car payment, utilities,
credit cards, etc. It's nonsense.
What really upsets the Democrats is that anyone would dare to question the
Democrat's irresponsible borrowing and spending party. How dare anyone hold
If I were a bank, I would be reluctant to loan money to those who think Lee,
Chaffetz, Bishop, and Stewart did the right thing by effectively voting for the
U.S. to default on its debt.
Surprise! The liberals here are not going to vote for any of the republican
incumbents. Who would have thought! I am sure they would have, had it not been
for the last 3 weeks. (Sarcasm off)The debt ceiling is a grade 2
rapid compared to Niagara Falls called bankruptcy, which is surely coming to the
US if we don't get our spending under control. Thank goodness some
legislators are willing to try to steer the federal government away from the
I read somewhere that governing by crisis (which has been done since 2010) has
consistently kept the GDP down by a full 1%. Imagine what a higher GDP could
accomplish/lead to?Is it really surprising Lee would play this card?
Am I the only one who recalls his playing fast & loose w/ his own mortgage?
The Junior Senator from Zion has no credibility IMO.
There are sins of commission and sins of omission. The black 4 are guilty of
both. Lets remove them all at the next opportunity.
We actually did partially default once in 1979 with one of these stunts
(didn't even cross the debt ceiling line but got close enough it messed
things up for a couple weeks). Interest rates rose half a percent as a result
which doesn't sound like much but cost the nation billions. So much for
deficit reduction... this stunt would've just increased the money spent on
absolutely nothing (interest) if the Utah delegation had their way.
Per the Huffington post, U.S. defaulted on its debts in 1814 and 1979. 1979
Bond holders sued to recover interest and the courts identified it as a default.
In 1971, the U.S. defaulted on their debts when demand for Gold to replace
dollars was not honored and we stiffed the French for millions. The U.S.
terminated the gold standard. That's three defaults on U.S. debt. We may
not be bankrupt yet, but we as a nation are insolvent. It is strictly propaganda
for the Congress and President to claim we have not defaulted ever. Go
get'em Lee. Orin is the one who needs to be recalled.
"The black 4 are guilty of both. Lets remove them all at the next
opportunity."Isn't it the liberal left who claim that
opposition to Obama is because of racism. Yet here a liberal uses a racist
label to denigrate the opposition and color as reason to remove them from
I wish I had Mike R's ability to turn every political/financial question
into a moral one. I suppose it was OK when Reagan demanded GOP support for
raising the debt limit during his two terms - eighteen times! Now the good guys
are all supposed to favor stiffing our creditors, shutting down government
services (at least the ones that go to other people) and deregulating everything
in sight. What could possibly go wrong?If it requires a genius to
simultaneously hold two contradictory convictions, then Mike R. is up there with
"If it requires a genius to simultaneously hold two contradictory
convictions" Read what Obama said about raising the debt ceiling while a
senator. Oh that's right he is a genius.
At least Lee was front and center because he was raising funds for his little
campaign fund. The remainders did their subterfuge in the shadows, pandering to
those tpees that think not paying bills is acceptable. This pandering to a
minority of citizens lacks understanding that Utah's largest employer is
the public sector and that wasting money down the rabbit holes like government
shutdowns and unfunded wars just isn't helping anyone but their donors.
This must stop. Pragmatism must prevail.
Mountanman said, "What really upsets the Democrats is that anyone would dare
to question the Democrat's irresponsible borrowing and spending
party."So let's take a look at the last 33 years - since
1980 when deficit spending began to skyrocket.During the Reagan
years the debt increased by 163%During the Bush Sr. years the debt
increassed by 44%During the Clinton years the debt increased 26%During the Bush Jr. years the debt increased 81%And so far, during the
Obama years, the debt increased 33%Average those numbers and you
find that during Republican administrations over that period the debt increased
96% while it increased a little less than 30% under Democratic
administrations.And which one did you call the "irresponsible
borrowing and spending party"?
@ECR exactly why the tea party started under bush's administration.
Roland,Please re-read the letter and re-read my comment. The article
specifically mentioned default on the debt, to which I responded. There would
have been no default on the debt.If every bill passed by the
government is sacrosanct, why are you giving BO a pass for not enforcing the
employer mandate in Obamacare, or our immigration laws, or federal drug laws?
Neither you, nor BO, should be able to pick and choose which laws are enforced,
whether or not such failure constitutes a “default” of any term or
condition.Curmudgeon, There was NEVER a threat of default on
the debt.Wally West,That’s how BO prefers to govern
– by crisis. How much is obamacare keeping the economy down?Mike in Cedar,Had you used that term and been named Buttars, the left
would have screamed for your head as a racist.atl1341979
– dem contolECR,More debt was added during BO’s
first 38 months than during any other 96 month term. Bush’s deficits were
higher with a dem house than with a GOP house, and you want to draw comparisons?
Welcome to the right side!
The liberal hate machiene is really running hard today.We hear them
bemoaning our Congressmen voting against dumping more debt on our children and
grandchildren.To "Roland Kayser" you are sort of right, but
are mostly wrong. The federal government has no obligation to maintain any
specific funding levels for any program. If they decide to cut funding for
roads in half, they can do so. The only obligations that must be paid to avoid
default are debt payments or other contractual obligations. Everything else is
based on desires. For example, if congress wanted to cut welfare to $1
million/yr they could. Congress could even cut welfare off.To
"ECR" your numbers are off. Obama has increased the debt by over 66%,
and is on track to raise it more than Bush. You also forget that Bush's
81% was only 5Trillion, where Obama's 66% is pushing $7 Trillion.
Lost in DC - So with your logic, any deficits under a Democratic President are
the fault of the president and any deficits under a Democratic Congress are the
fault of the Congress.Convenient.
ECR,You have twisted my comment – typical liberal response. Please
tell me where I said a deficit was good. I did not. I stated facts, did not
express opinion.Resorting to falsehoods reveals a weakness in your
argument. I pointed out facts – bush had lower deficits when he had a
repub house than when he had a dem house. BO has had lower deficits with a
repub house than with a dem house; again stating facts – not expressing
opinion.And as for the rest of the mess; the house passed
legislation to fund all of the government expect obamacare – BO and the
dems think so highly of this self-described train wreck that BO and harry
threatened default on other obligations to protect it. They felt obamacare was
more important than all the rest of the government combined.
@ ECR. Baloney! When George W. Bush left office on January 20, 2009, the
national debt was $10,626,877,048,913.08. Today, less than 5 years later, Obama
has increased the debt to just over $17 trillion and Congress just gave him
authority to borrow another $850 billion this year. My calculator says going
from $10 trillion to $17 trillion is a whopping 58.8% increase in less than 5
years with the debt forecast to be over $20 trillion by the time Obama leaves
office. That is a 100% increase and it isn't a question of if that will
happen, the question is if $20 trillion is even a close estimate of what the
actual debt will be at that time. Please stop lying!
Were they hiding somewhere?
Mountanman: You speak as though the president had the power to
spend without restraint. Last I checked, appropriations is a function of
Congress, not the executive. Why do you not blame Congress for the deficit?
And if you blame Obama, do you also blame all of his predecessors for the
increases in the deficit during each of their terms?
Lost in DC and Mountanman - before you both blow a gasket, let me admit that my
comments were ludicrous, but no more so than yours. Don't we all have to
admit that regardless of who is in office spending has increased? And so it is
certainly necessary to stop deficit spending. And in my opinion it has to come
by way of increased revenue (yes, I'm talking about tax rates) and lower
spending. During the Clinton years we actually achieved a surplus budget and
starting paying down the debt (yes, Lost in DC, I've heard your argument
refuting that fact but every reputable source I know of says we had a surplus.
That was achieved by a Democratic President and Republican Congress, but most of
all it was achieved by a very robust economy which resulted in increased tax
revenue.A couple of other issues --From a source more reliable
than me, the official numbers show that increases for each president are as
follows: Reagan 187%; Bush Sr. 57%; Clinton 36%; Bush Jr. 89% and Obama so far
54% after only five years. Mountanman your number starts at the
beginning of Bush's last year. See my next comment...
...Bush Jr. gets credit for FY2009 because that budget was established by his
administration. Therefore Obama started with FY2010, which starts in October of
2009.If you are going to argue that Obama started his administration
on equal ground with all the other presidents mentioned then you have zero
credibility. The economic conditions he inherited from the previous
administration had not been seen since the 30's. Since he took office the
deficit, while still too large, has been cut in half. And Obama's rate of
increase in spending is lower than any president since Eisenhower.Having said all that, let me repeat - We have got to stop deficit spending
with responsible cost cutting and responsible revenue increases. A healthy
economy will increase revenues but that won't happen while Congress plays
games with all of our well being.
Sitting in their hands was why they were elected. Were they out giving Hannity
What really upsets the Republicans is that anyone would dare to question the
Republicans irresponsible spending without increasing revenues party. Does
anyone remember two wars coupled with record tax cuts? How dare anyone hold them
accountable! Have we all forgotten President Cheney and his little buddy?
To "one old man" while you make your totally biased complaint, you
should realize that th Democrats in Congress have added to the debt at twice the
rate that Republicans have added to the debt. Since 1980 the Democrats have
averaged $732 billion/yr in deficit spending when they controlled congress,
while Republicans have averaged only $300 billion/yr. (Taken from GAO
Historical Tables for FY2012)Right now I would vote for a Republican
that could promise to reduce our yearly deficit to $300 billion.Why
do you blame the party that has't controlled congress in the past 7 years?
The largest deficits in US history have occured while Democrats controlled
Congress and the Presidency. Doesn't that bother you?
Redshirt,Have Republicans reduced the national debt?