Comments about ‘Would the world be more moral without God and religion?’

Return to article »

Published: Wednesday, Oct. 2 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Happy Valley Heretic
Orem, UT

Would the world be more moral without God and religion?

The 2 aren't mutually inclusive.

a bit of reality
Shawnee Mission, KS

What if we rephrased the question, "would the world be more moral without Allah and Islam?"

Being devoted to a higher power doesn't ensure you have an objective view of morality.

American Fork, UT

Yes. We're born with a sense of morality, and religion has enabled us like no other idea to behave contrary to those morals. Almost all the strife in the world today has a religious basis.

Twin Lights
Louisville, KY

We're born with a sense of morality? Maybe. But do we retain it? Read Lord of the Flies.

spring street

@twin lights
You do realize that like Murphy Brown, the Lord of the Flies is a work of fiction?

Phoenix, AZ

Religion grows bigger and worse with the international corporate church business. God has become a trade mark to stage political and economic power over the innocent and dumb. If one can't find god in his/her own heart they will not find it in a corporate church.

Tyler D
Meridian, ID

Rather than having an abstract discussion about this – which would be about as productive as discussing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin – why not look at countries where the citizens have organically shed religious belief and compare them to the most religious countries on the planet.

Looking at the two at either end of the spectrum, if you had to pick which one you wanted your kids to be born (and live their lives) in, would it be Sweden or Pakistan?

Here, UT

The premise that morality is the result of religion and god is a faulty premise. Morality is due to our need to interact with one another in a manner such that we all benefit as a whole.

LDS Liberal
Farmington, UT

Let see...

Lamanites and Nephites fight over religion,
Muslims, Jews, and Christians fight,
Hindi and Muslims fighting,
Buddhists and Christians fighting,
Irish Catholics and Protestants fighting,
Baptists and Mormons fighting,

I think the world would be better God and LESS religion.

[The older I get, the more profound John Lennon becomes...]

Irony Guy
Bountiful, Utah

The unrighteous dominion style of religion is the second beast in the book of Revelation. As we can readily distinguish between the ethical and unethical uses of religion, that means ethics are more fundamental than religion and seem to be inborn in most people.

m.g. scott
clearfield, UT

I wrote this once already, but I guess Des News didn't get the memo, so here goes again.

LDS Liberal

From what you wrote it seems as if the LDS part is or has faded away. Sorry about that.
However, Baptists and Mormons fighting? Please tell us where that is happening as I've seen no stories about Mormons or Baptists having any problems. Thanks. As for John Lennon, his sentiment was more athiestic than anything.

Tyler D

I would not want to live in Pakistan, but would have no problem living in any country that had as it's foundation Christian roots, even if it was becoming more secular.

Here, UT

@Tyler D;

Would you be happy living in a Christian country that burned heretics? You might just be considered a heretic there yourself.

That old saying comes to mind: Be careful what you wish for.

Here, UT

@Tyler D;

Sorry, my comment should have been directed at mgScott. Please accept my apologies.

Ernest T. Bass
Bountiful, UT

Just reading the headline: Absolutely YES!

Tyler D
Meridian, ID

@Ranch – “Sorry, my comment should have been directed at mgScott. Please accept my apologies.”

No apology necessary… figured as much and got a good chuckle out of it anyway.

And no doubt I would be charcoal living in Europe during the Dark Ages. I continue to be amazed when religious people assert that values like individual liberty, free speech, and free thought somehow sprang from their roots & sacred books.

Nothing could be further from the truth and we see this even in the modern world - whenever religion is combined with state power all its tendencies are towards conformity, compliance and obedience to (religious) authority – THE key lesson (obey!) of their sacred books, by the way.

That most religious believers today (in non-Muslim countries) have internalized the values of the Enlightenment (which are based on Athens & Rome) and our Founders is great, but those values are not found in the source books of religion (though few believers seem willing to admit this).

Just a few thoughts sparked by your comment… sorry for preaching.

m.g. scott
clearfield, UT

Tyler D and Ranch

Welcome to the 21st century. I assumed (my fault no doubt) that we all were talking about the world today. Today there is no Christian nation that I know of where I would fear being a who I am. However, I can't think of a Muslim nation, particularly in the Middle-East where I would not fear being Christian. Hope that clears things up. As I said, welcome to the real world.

Durham, NC

You should not need the fear of God or Religion to do the right thing..... you should have the moral backbone to do what is right regardless.

But no, the world would not be better without either God or Religion.

The world would be better of if people didn't use the two as justification to advance their own personal agendas though.... and that happens all the time.

george of the jungle
goshen, UT

If your religion is to smile love and give your word your religion is to give the gifts you can keep


Neither religion nor atheism are inherently good or bad - it is what you do with them that matters.

As far as historic records show, there has never been a truly atheistic society - there has always been some form of supreme being or supreme leader (Mao and Stalin, etc., were supreme leaders - taking the place of gods in their societies.)

However, as time has progressed things that were considered moral under one religion have become immoral and the religion has either changed with the times or been replaced by newer religions.

As an example, the more society has advanced from basic survival needs, the less acceptable it has become to raid the neighboring villages and take slaves and concubines. The more food security we have the less acceptable it is to kill over food.

The one drawback with basing morals in religion is what happens when there are multiple religions, often with competing morals? For that, secular (in the India understanding of the word) morals may offer common ground and acceptance of different viewpoints without stifling worship.

Salt Lake City, UT

I believe morality exists whether or not one believes in God. But this is a belief in itself.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments