barry, glad you have time to discuss this. how about some time around the irs,
Benghazi, ap, rosen,nsa?
That's "President Barry" to you, Mr. alumnus.
look at the next headline down "unemployment up in 1/3 of states"thanks, BO, for working to kill a domestic industry
mr. markyno, it is king barry
It's silly and almost humorous that the EPA administrator would actually
try to make people think that these new coal emission restrains will actually be
good for the industry. What a farce! How gullible does she really think people
are? But then again, she did probably realize she was talking to many of those
who voted for the president.Just yesterday there was an AP article
that said scientists are now baffled in trying to explain why global warming
hasn't worsened over the past number of years... essentially admitting that
perhaps global warming isn't as real as they originally believed. And in
response, we get this nonsensical reply from our president... trying so
desperately to push his agenda regardless of what science says or admits.
He's quickly becoming President Irrelevant.
Not only are these new regulations harsh and unnecessary but they are also for
the most part entirely symbolic. They apply to only new coal based power plants
and do not affect existing power plants. The fact is that coal use for power is
on the decline and there are few if any new coal power plants in the works.
Natural gas is plentiful, and cheaper and is what the majority of new power
plants will be using.
If unemployment is up in 1/3 of the states, doesn't that mean....? Oh,
I just read an article last week in newsmaxthat the arctic is up 60
percent!! Says alotabout our president and the anvironmentalistsglobal warming thinking.
This is a good reason to Go Nuclear!!
Are global temperatures going up or not? Make up your mind DMN. Yesterday you
published an article indicating they haven't gone up in more than a
decade.We'll see how these regulations work or not.
Government double-speakers always say the new policy to shut them down is
actually intended to "HELP" the industry they are trying to get rid of.
Cutting the military budget is always intended to HELP the military, cutting
Pensions is always couched as trying to HELP the employees, cutting Social
Security is always intended to HELP retirees. etc.I don't want
any Obama fans complaining when energy prices sky-rocket.
m.g. scott--Go Nuclear?President Barry would set limits on that too!
It's got to be solar.
Anther example from the extreme left of their disdain for the poor and middle
class as their policies drive up the cost of heat and electricity for them.