Quantcast

Comments about ‘Kathleen Parker: Shocker: KGB colonel outmaneuvers the community organizer’

Return to article »

Published: Tuesday, Sept. 17 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
FT1/SS
Virginia Beach, VA

What's comical are the left leaning commentator's, and writers who think Obama is out manuevering Putin, and joined by those who comment on the articles. Putin is showing us how after 5 years we still have an inexperience president, and a low information voting block that voted him back.

Esquire
Springville, UT

This is ludicrous. On so many levels. I'll defer for now, but what would Parker want done differently? War, which the right wing claims they didn't want? This right wing talking point highlighted in this piece is beyond absurd.

one vote
Salt Lake City, UT

The entire Utah delegation turned to peace doves. We need to stop war crimes and support the President. This writer supports a Russian leader to jump on the Utah bitter Romney loss bandwagon.

cjb
Bountiful, UT

If Syria give up its nerve gas stock piles which is what looks like it's going to happen this is a much bigger win than lobbing a few cruise missiles.

Nobody has out maneuvered anybody here. this is a win for the whole world.

pragmatistferlife
salt lake city, utah

"We can't quite seem to get it quite right at the helm. Either we're saddled with a "decidinator" who is feared for his lack of pause — or we're stuck with an over-thinker so afraid of making the wrong decision that he paralyzes himself into a pose of ineptitude." . Yet one cost us thousands of live billions of dollars and a divided politic not seen in decades. The other a peaceful solution, and fodder for the ideologues. You know Kathleen despite all it's faults Russia has been a partner of the US many times in history. It's always messy it's always, controversial, but the world is generally better off for it. Think World War II, missile disarmament, Cuban missile crisis, and now Syria.

Nate
Pleasant Grove, UT

Obama attended a church for twenty years in which the preacher routinely condemned America. Now it's some kind of surprise to everyone that when Obama is president, America comes out diminished.

Mister J
Salt Lake City, UT

There is more strategery in Moscow than DC? Mission Accomplished!?

Maudine
SLC, UT

Ignoring the facts and repeating the same nonsense over and over again, does not make the nonsense valid.

Putin had no intention of getting involved in the Syrian conflict. He supports Assad and denies that Assad had anything to do with the release of chemical weapons. Yet somehow, he is now directly involved with destroying those chemical weapons. How is that him outmaneuvering Obama? From the very beginning Obama wanted Russia involved in this and now Russia is. How is Obama getting what he wanted in the first place an example of Obama being outmaneuvered?

Russia is doing exactly what they said they would not do and exactly what Obama wanted them to do - on top of which, Russia is doing exactly what Republicans wanted done, and the fact that they are condemning Obama for getting to Russia to act, shows the depths of their hypocrisy.

Obama got his way. The only people who were outmaneuvered were the Russians and the Republicans.

Craig Clark
Boulder, CO

A President taking his lumps from critics goes with the turf. At least for now, the world has stepped back from the brink. Negotiation instead of shooting is a welcome development in my view. Brinksmanship is such a dangerous path for achieving objectives. It doesn’t matter who outmaneuvered who. I’ll gladly keep reading as Kathleen Parker explains it to us with 20/20 hindsight. Once the missiles are launched, events are difficult to control.

FreedomFighter41
Provo, UT

Kathleen Parker must have really hated President Bush's foreign policy if humiliation is embarrassing for her.

Oh wait... For 8 years all she did was defend and rationalize for him.

Mark B
Eureka, CA

If Obama thought up a cure for cancer in his spare time, the Right would still complain that he hadn't done anything about the common cold. If nothing else, we should be glad that some innocent Syrians are going to go on living who would otherwise be gone.

louie
Cottonwood Heights, UT

"Putin now has taken the high road, scolding the U.S. for its "commonplace" interventions in countries not its own." Really...Does the world really think that Putin is taking the high road when he supports Assad and evidence is pointing more and more that the Syrian government launched the chemical weapons. I suggest we look at world opinion again and ask the question do we think a world leaders should support countries that uses chemical weapons. Putin has now backed himself into a corner. The only way he can gain any world respect is to facilitate the complete the removal of these chemical weapons, which is a win win for everybody. by the way, who warned against the use of chemical weapons?

m.g. scott
clearfield, UT

Mark B

Your comment about innocent Syrians going on to live who would otherwise be gone. Do you understand that Assad is killing Syrians by the 10s of thousands? Stopping his nerve gas attacks will not save lives. He will continue to kill and create millions of refugees with conventional weapons.

As for any of you who believe that if Romney were President Republicans would support an attack on Syria, I for one go on record as saying I'd be just as against it as with Obama.
Funny how many Obama supporters said that Romney wanted to start wars with Russia, Syria, and Iran. Must be hard to watch Obamas dilemma now.

Mark B
Eureka, CA

m.g., I know the civil war in Syria will continue, and that more people will die. I was referring, however, to the Syrian version of "Shock & Awe", which would no doubt have produced plenty of "collateral damage". That, IMHO, would be much worse than allowing Mr. Putin a moment in the spotlight.

As for Romney, his friends in the defense industry could have applied enough pressure to make one more war very possible.

Esquire
Springville, UT

OK, The President went out of his way not to intervene in Syria's civil war over the past year or so. The neo-cons wanted intervention, but the American people clearly did not. When the President did want to act, Congress (especially the GOP) was on the path of saying no. A diplomatic solution was found which very well could peacefully remove chemical weapons without military intervention or loss of life. If it is a big game in the end, intervention is on the table down the road. The idea originated with Kerry and was picked up on by the Russians, and a deal was reached. Everyone happy, right? Not the GOP. They didn't want Obama to intervene, but they criticize him for not intervening. Their babbling would make Alice in Wonderland look sane. Here's the bottom line. Despite the complaining of the right wing, this was a diplomatic masterpiece by Obama. If you wanted something different, tell us what it was. War? The ways of the neo-cons don't work and for that they are upset.

m.g. scott
clearfield, UT

Mark B

With the war weary American public, I doubt any President right now could instigate a full scale war, even if it was necessary. That due to the fact that we stayed way too long in Afghanistan and Iraq with no exit strategy. That is why Kerry was saying that the attack in Syria, should it come, would be small and quick. What Kerry and Obama have done is the opposite of the Teddy Roosevelt policy of "Talk softly and carry a big stick". Theirs has become talk loundly and carry a small stick.

dalefarr
South Jordan, Utah

This is the third opinion article published by the Deseret News in five days griping that Putin outfoxed Obama. Again, if chemical weapons are destroyed without the U.S, having to fire a shot, who cares? Moreover does the Deseret News really think that anyone would have been better off if the U.S. had fired some missiles or dropped some bombs? I do not.

Irony Guy
Bountiful, Utah

Obama threatened to knock out Assad's warmaking capacity BECAUSE of use of chem weapons. Assad says, "OK, I'll give up my chem weapons." That's what Obama wanted. Assad would have done nothing without the threat. Obama's threat was what mattered; Putin is playing catch up.

UtahBlueDevil
Durham, NC

Syria is having to give up their weapons of mass destruction. ... without a single bullet being fired. You call it being out maneuvered, others of us call a good old poker move to make the other player show and play their hand. Do you really think if we had not threatened air strikes Syria would have capitulated.

I know.... see failure in everything.... it is the popular thing to do. But I look at it as billions saved in US tax payers money, thousands of lives spared, and we still go what we wanted. If we could only get out played by a Russian colonel more often.... life would be wonderful.

I hope Putin continues to out maneuver us over and over again if the net result is we get what we want. The weapons gone... that is what we wanted... right?

Or is this just more political rhetoric.....

radically_independent
Orem, Utah

"I didn't set a red line," Obama has said. "The world set a red line."

"This not only is false but sounds petulant."

What a sad statement. The massacre of hundreds, if not thousands of civilians is not to be considered a crossing of a line? What then does dear Kathleen Parker as crossing a line that society commonly accepts. Was the number of people killed not enough? Was use of poison gas not sinister enough? What Kathleen would constitute in your mind as an act that crosses a line.

Some consider spanking kids as crossing a line. Some consider abuse of seniors as a line crossed. Most consider rape and murder a line crossed.

But the gassing and genocide of innocent civilians, regardless of who did the act, that crosses no societal lines.

Please don't tell me the lines are dependent on who the president... that we have some kind of variable ethics here. Genocide or mass murder is a line crossed under a Republican administration, but not so under a Democrat administration. Please tell me you are not that... evil yourself.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments