Applying for health insurance? Don't forget to do your homework


Return To Article
  • samhill Salt Lake City, UT
    Sept. 12, 2013 1:12 p.m.

    "How smoothly all this works is one of the big unknowns. It could get tedious if discrepancies take time to resolve."


    Well, if the reporter really thinks the smoothness of how this ridiculous mess will work is an "unknown", especially after the numerous delays, exemptions, waivers and various buy offs to favored constituencies that have **already** happened, then this reporter should find other work.

    It IS a gargantuan mess and it will only get worse. All of the shills for Obama who have been trying to sell us this farce ever since it got passed (by other Obama shills) will continue their snake oil Obamacare sales pitch. But, for any who have any honesty and integrity at all, it will always appear to be exactly the socialist scam that it is.

  • Mark B Eureka, CA
    Sept. 12, 2013 11:57 a.m.

    Me so sorry for woefulness. No doubt everyone else is more hip to WJ thinking.

  • lost in DC West Jordan, UT
    Sept. 12, 2013 11:31 a.m.

    Mark B
    sorry you so woefully misunderstood my comment. I was asking who pays for all the subsidies to obamacare, not for the obamacare advertisement put out by the AP that the DN chose to run.

  • Mark B Eureka, CA
    Sept. 12, 2013 10:57 a.m.

    The article comes from the AP. That would mean that DN "pays" for it, along with hundreds of other articles they may choose to print.

    I hope that answers lost's question. Apparently he has no problem not knowing the payment arrangements for the Liljenquist article on the editorial page.

  • lost in DC West Jordan, UT
    Sept. 12, 2013 5:15 a.m.

    Where is the required disclaimer at the top of this advertisement that lets you know it IS an ad and not a news story?

    “if you're like most people, you'll be getting a tax credit to help pay your premiums.”

    Who is paying for this? The money has to come from somewhere.

    spring street,
    we voted out the congress that voted for this monstrosity that you have to pass before you can know what’s in it.

  • worf Mcallen, TX
    Sept. 11, 2013 7:58 p.m.

    We have a national debt equal to $560,000 for every second in a year,--and you want more funding?

    Where do you come up with "a congress that votes for a law then vote against funding"?

    Excessive funding has polluted our economy.

  • spring street SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    Sept. 11, 2013 7:19 p.m.

    You're right we should not vote for a congress that votes for a law then vote against funding it.

  • worf Mcallen, TX
    Sept. 11, 2013 2:47 p.m.

    This country gets what it voted for.