Danielle Pletka: Syria debate is about incoherent Obama policies


Return To Article
  • Mickey Kovars Tampa, FL
    Sept. 9, 2013 3:21 p.m.

    The proposed intervention makes no sense either militarily or diplomatically. It seems designed for one purpose only -- to convince the American public that Obama is a tough guy whose red line cannot be crossed without consequences. That is not a sufficient reason to go forward with this attack.

  • SEY Sandy, UT
    Sept. 8, 2013 9:28 p.m.

    Iron Rod: she's with the American Enterprise Institute, a solidly neoconservative think tank. You can be safe betting on her support of the Iraq invasion. This article is similar to Charles Krauthammer's today.

  • Iron Rod Salt Lake City, UT
    Sept. 8, 2013 10:10 a.m.

    I wonder of the author feels our actions were have any impact on the price of fuel here in the United States and the rest of the world?

    It appears to me that the author is interested in getting rid of Assad because he is an associated with Iran.

    You might want to do a Google Search of her background to see if she was pro war in Iraq and also if she down plays any effects of our military action in Syria.

  • one vote Salt Lake City, UT
    Sept. 8, 2013 8:28 a.m.

    These peace movement articles are interesting. The Republicans will soon be the peace party as well as the do nothing party.