Comments about ‘Danielle Pletka: Syria debate is about incoherent Obama policies’

Return to article »

Published: Sunday, Sept. 8 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
one vote
Salt Lake City, UT

These peace movement articles are interesting. The Republicans will soon be the peace party as well as the do nothing party.

Iron Rod
Salt Lake City, UT

I wonder of the author feels our actions were have any impact on the price of fuel here in the United States and the rest of the world?

It appears to me that the author is interested in getting rid of Assad because he is an associated with Iran.

You might want to do a Google Search of her background to see if she was pro war in Iraq and also if she down plays any effects of our military action in Syria.

SEY
Sandy, UT

Iron Rod: she's with the American Enterprise Institute, a solidly neoconservative think tank. You can be safe betting on her support of the Iraq invasion. This article is similar to Charles Krauthammer's today.

Mickey Kovars
Tampa, FL

The proposed intervention makes no sense either militarily or diplomatically. It seems designed for one purpose only -- to convince the American public that Obama is a tough guy whose red line cannot be crossed without consequences. That is not a sufficient reason to go forward with this attack.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments