Comments about ‘Michael Gerson: A vote against attacking Syria would seriously harm the U.S.’

Return to article »

Published: Friday, Sept. 6 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT

  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Mainly Me
Werribee, 00

No it wouldn't. We don't need to get involved in another middle east war. I realize the Dear Leader is claiming that Assad is responsible, but has anyone read about the Russian report disputing this? Or has anyone read the alternative media reports that the Syrian rebels admitted responsibility for the gas attack?

Sarah Palin said it best: "Let Allah sort it out."

Far East USA, SC

"A limited military strike may be symbolic. But for Congress to block that strike would be more than symbolic. It would undermine a tangible element of American influence: the perception that the commander in chief is fully in command."


So, Mr Gerson could justify "symbolic" military engagement to boost our credentials in the world?

This is the guy who proposed the use of a "smoking gun/mushroom cloud" metaphor to drum up support for the Iraq war. A true NeoCon. (and a senior policy advisor under Bush)

What a callous (and dangerous) view on war.

one vote
Salt Lake City, UT

But all the tea party people are listening to Putin and the doves, like Senator Lee.

Hayden, ID

A vote against attacking Syria would not harm America, it would harm Obama's credibility after issuing the red line ultimatum. Its impossible to fake being tough isn't it Mr. Obama.

Tyler D
Meridian, ID

Is anyone else a little tired of being the world’s (unfunded) police force?

How many countries have signed the Chemical Weapons Convention and why isn’t the credibility of any of those countries “on the line” like ours supposedly is?

Here’s a thought – let’s go to the UN and explain that we will no longer take unilateral action anywhere in the world and our future involvement is contingent upon passed resolutions and all counties voting in favor footing their share of the cost (say, based on their percentage of the world’s population)

So pay up India and China or deal with the world’s problems on your own… especially ones in your own backyard (e.g., North Korea).

Sandy, UT

Gerson is defending the type of imperial presidency created under George W. Bush. For some unfathomable reason, he feels it's worth killing innocent people and spending who knows how much money (which we don't have) just to make his point. Typically, he shows no concern for the law of unintended consequences that gets us in over our collective head. This is neoconservatism at its ugliest.

red state pride
Cottonwood Heights, UT

Gerson is correct that the Obama administration has mishandled the Syrian civil war from the beginning. That said, if we didn't intervene 2 years ago why should we intervene now? I think the argument that voting against would weaken the executive branch is over-thinking things and too cute by half.
Weaken the executive branch? Are you kidding me? How many times has Pres Obama said " if Congress doesn't act I'll do it on my own"? I don't know why we even have a legislative branch with this crowd in charge. Unelected bureaucrats at the EPA issuing countless regulations. Unelected bureaucrats at HSA in conjunction with their lobbyist masters issuing regulation after regulation regarding how allegedly free citizens receive their healthcare. Ridiculous argument.

Ogden, UT

Send our brave Military into harms way just so a Pretender in Chiefs credibility will not be harmed. I think not. The great Pretender has stated himself that his credibility was not at stake. He claims he did not draw a red line, the world did, Congress did. I am amazed that he did not say that Bush drew the red line. Or did he inherited the red line. Has anyone ever noticed that he never and I mean never accepts responsibility for anything Oh I forgot Bin Laden is dead. He beat that drum loudly. It is a shame that we are trying hard who to believe Obama, Kerry, or Putin. I hate to admit I am leaning toward Putin.Also notice that Obama does everything he can to oust these dictators knowing full well that Muslim extremeists will fill the void. Remember when he said “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction. Hmmm. Is his muslim roots sprouting?

Murray, UT

So the liberal regulars are calling Gerson a neo-con for defending president Obama's position on Syria.


Does that mean you think Obama is a neo-con too?

Ogden, UT

Leon Paneta stated on Sept. 28, 2012 the following "The U.S. has lost track of some of Syria’s chemical weapons, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Friday, and does not know if any potentially lethal chemicals have fallen into the hands of Syrian rebels or Iranian forces inside the country". Hmmm Could Putin be correct? Read Yossef Bodansky article on this very subject.

Sandy, UT

What grates on my nerves is Gerson's loose usage of the term "isolationist." There is a world of difference between the concepts of isolationism and non-interventionism. Blurring that distinction is irresponsible. It's entirely possible to be engaged internationally and still be non-interventionist, and that's how it should be.

Herriman, UT

Not a convincing article at all. Any action taken would simply kill and wound innocent people who had nothing to do with the decision to use chemical weapons. War is not a game, it is a tragedy and it destroys lives - and a life of any person on this planet is more important than some first world country feeling solid about their standing and reputation. Unless responding to an outright attack on our own nation, we have no business attacking another.

Salt Lake City, UT

@one vote:
we are not listening to Putin. We are trying to discern the truth; whatever the source.

Bush took the US into war with Iraq with deception of WMDs. and later made jokes about it at a ceremonial dinner: "No, WMD's here, yuk yuk yuk".

It appears that the American people are being deceived again to pull us into a war with Syria; To help support the side that just might be responsible for killing their own people to gain favor. Has the Obama administration offered any substantial evidence that Assad is responsible? No. We just have his word. Given Obama's track record for telling the truth, I would believe former KGB agent Putin over him. The US military started making plans to train the Syrian rebels back in March, months before this gassing. Now isn't it convenient that there is a reason to give us cause to help? I would not be surprised if the CIA was involved somehow.

Standing firm in doing the right thing is not being a dove.

Far East USA, SC


Maybe directed in part at me?

I disagree with Obama on this. It is easy as I vote both R and D and have no blind allegiance to either party. And, at the end of the day, the Dems will not provide enough votes.

"Does that mean you think Obama is a neo-con too?"

Of course not. Do you?

Neocons typically favor war. Certainly Gerson is a neocon, as is McCain and Graham.

Sometimes I agree with them, does that make me a neocon.

Are you not concerned that Gerson advocates using the military as a "symbolic" gesture? That thinking is what scares me about Neocons.

Roland Kayser
Cottonwood Heights, UT

Mitt Romney supported getting involved in Syria. If he had been elected, all of the Republicans would be supporting him in his decision to go in. I suspect that all of the right leaning commenters on this forum would also be supporting him.

I'm opposed to intervention, but I suspect that the main reason Republicans are opposed is just one more example of their trying to make Obama fail, no matter what he proposes.

Wasilla, AK

I have a book titled: "Polish acts of atrocity against the German minority". It was used to convince the German people that the invasion of Poland was necessary. In the last hundred years how many times have the people been tricked into going to war by the politicians and the press?

Ogden, UT

Obama and Kerry have stated that we know Assad did it, when he did it and how he did it.
In no way do I impune the U.S. Inteligence apparatus. But Brack listen to your words on Bengazi. "But make no mistake: we will get to the bottom of this, we will find out who did this, we’ll find out why they did this. Any responsible individuals, any responsible groups, will feel the full weight of justice.” You knew within days of the Syrian attack all the particulars but one year later we still do not know the who's and why's of Bengazi.You are ready to attack Syria over killing of their own people but nothing in the killing of a U.S. Ambassador? Your credibility was questioned quite some time ago. No I do not believe you or Kerry. You know Kerry is the guy who served in Viet Nam.

Iron Rod
Salt Lake City, UT

Re Mohokat: Ogden Ut

Could you please site your source for this comment in quotations? "I will stand with the Muslims should the poliical winds shift in an ugly direction." President Obama.

Personally I have never heard this quote attributed to President Obama by reputable news sources.

I would be interested in the source.

Ogden, UT

Iron Rod In his own book “Audacity of Hope” he writes: “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” The quote comes from page 261 of the paperback edition of “The Audacity of Hope.

Far East USA, SC

Iron Rod, I too was curious, as these kinds of statements are virtually ALWAYS taken out of context (or are outright false). Unfortunately, it does not matter to many if it furthers their cause.

Let me help you out. Here is the statement in context from Snopes.

"In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example, have more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging. They have been reminded that the history of immigration in this country has a dark underbelly. They need specific reassurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during WW II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly Direction"

Big surprise. When one reads the context, it is a reasonable statement.

Unfortunately, "reasonable" was not the intent of the poster.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments