Comments about ‘Elder Rasband breaks ground for Fort Collins Colorado Temple’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, Aug. 26 2013 8:45 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
heidi ho
Fort Collins, CO

We were there! It was beautiful and so wonderful to hear Brother Rasband and his wife speak. It was also wonderful to see the beautiful example of the saints when they were asked to give up their seats for the more elderly members who were standing. A beautiful morning, a beautiful spirit and the chance to have a beautiful new temple in Fort Collins.

Lionheart
West Jordan, Ut

Where is the site for the temple?

maclouie
Falconer, NY

My first impression seeing the artist rendition: Wow, times are moving fast. The surge of missionaries, the new film, and now Temples that look like chapels, and a member of the seventy doing the dedication. The Saints (and the world) are being prepared for something bigger. While some are critical I see things differently and hope I will be ready.

KinCO
Fort Collins, CO

We were there too--a beautiful morning! I wish the DN would have had photos of the actual event (there were several official photographers clicking away) instead of only the rendering of the temple, which we have seen many times before.

And Frere Durand--at 30,389 sq feet, it is hardly the size of a small chapel. In fact, it will be a little larger than the Denver Temple. What's with the grumpy people in Sacramento? Or maybe it's the same person commenting twice . . .

Aggielove
Cache county, USA

Kinco
My thoughts exactly.
But remember, they do live in California.

KinCO
Fort Collins, CO

Frere Durand, I think you need to check your numbers. A 30,000 sq ft house would not be considered "large", it would be a mega-mansion! The average home in the US is about 2,300 sq ft, and high end homes average 5,000 sq ft, depending, of course, whether you are in expensive Manhattan or . . . Sacramento. I am sorry that you do not like the Fort Collins Temple. Good news! You live far, far away and will never have to come here (great sigh of relief heard from Fort Collins). We are so happy to have a temple in our midst and look forward to its completion and dedication.

Just FYI, the Sacramento Temple is 19,500 sq ft. and I think it looks lovely.

Don Bugg
Prince Frederick, MD

Just a few miles from the home where I grew up. We used to go on youth temple trips to Utah once every other year. When I think about how much progress the Church has made in that area, I'm thrilled.

I suppose it should go without saying that there's nothing "squat and ugly" about this temple's design, and nothing "trivial" or insulting about having the ground broken by a member of the Seventy.

Marcus967
Canada, 00

It always makes me shake my head when people get critical of a temple size or design. The idea is to have to opportunity to do The Lord's work. If The Lord so wished it could be done in a closet. If The Lord accepts the temple and The Lord asks the Prophet to send the second assistant to the ward librarian to dedicate it, who are we to question these things. Either the gospels true or it is not if you truly believe that that it is true (as I do) then we are led by a true prophet of God, and thus the person sent to dedicate a temple is the exact right person for the job. If the prophet was the better person for the assignment The Lord would have said so. Have faith brother the work is in good hands.

Montana Mormon
Miles City, MT

For those who are inclined to criticize the architecture and size of any temple, I offer this short parable by President Boyd K. Packer: "A merchant man seeking precious jewels found at last the perfect pearl. He had the finest craftsman carve a superb jewel box and line it with blue velvet. He put his pearl of great price on display so others could share his treasure. He watched as people came to see it. Soon he turned away in sorrow. It was the box they admired, not the pearl."

For devoted members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the design and size of a temple are immaterial. What matters is what takes place inside the temple. For those who are critical of the Church, your denigrating comments and opinions are likewise immaterial.

Twin Lights
Louisville, KY

I attend a temple that is about 10,700 sq. ft. in size and love it.

The Kirtland Temple is just about 15,000 sq. ft. and it was the source of much celebration.

As others have said, the grandeur of the temple is not the issue. But the ability to have sacred ordinances close to the people.

Has the announcement of new temples become trivial? I don't think so. But so much more common that perhaps we can miss the significance thereof.

Are temples becoming ubiquitous? I truly hope for that wonderful day.

maclouie
Falconer, NY

Obviously, Frere Durand has a decimal point in the wrong place. Common mistake made by many. Temples range in size from 6,000 sq feet to more than 100,000 sq ft. As one person said, a closet could be sufficient if the Lord wanted it so.

This is definitely a larger temple. The architecture is interesting but that is not what is important. I do think the photo gives the wrong impression which may indicate that Frere Durand and others are more visual than numbers oriented.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments