Quantcast
U.S. & World

Judge blocks Okla. morning-after pill restrictions

Comments

Return To Article
  • the truth Holladay, UT
    Aug. 20, 2013 5:59 p.m.

    @spring street

    According the 14th amendment it would be constitutional.

  • spring street SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    Aug. 19, 2013 10:04 p.m.

    Sorry that last comment was directed at "the truth"

  • spring street SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    Aug. 19, 2013 8:18 p.m.

    So as long as a law applies equally to everyone it is alright?

  • the truth Holladay, UT
    Aug. 19, 2013 5:27 p.m.

    EVERY law discriminates against some one.

    The real question is does is apply equally to everyone?

    So we want little girls buying this product?

  • Hutterite American Fork, UT
    Aug. 19, 2013 1:19 p.m.

    Every now and again some reason pokes through the rhetoric.

  • Kalindra Salt Lake City, Utah
    Aug. 19, 2013 11:42 a.m.

    This is a good ruling.

  • FatherOfFour WEST VALLEY CITY, UT
    Aug. 19, 2013 10:37 a.m.

    I always tell people, vote with your wallet. It is the most powerful vote out there. It is the one that ever company understands. If you don't want the morning after pill and you don't agree with its use, don't buy it.

  • no fit in SG St.George, Utah
    Aug. 19, 2013 10:28 a.m.

    Intelligent, common sense reasoning prevails.