Quantcast

Comments about ‘In our opinion: Reaching a bit too far’

Return to article »

Published: Friday, July 12 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
lost in DC
West Jordan, UT

the fix is simple - I think, though I know someone will correct me if my basic assumption is incorrect.

I assume - please correct me if I am wrong - that violations of state law would be heard in state court. amend the statute to require state judges to dismiss any land use charges brought by federal athorities based on state laws. the feds can charge all they want, but the cases will be dismissed in court. The feds will see the futility and stop.

if they can make charges based on federal law, they should do that in the first place, but if all they have is state law, and they know it will be heard in state court and there dismissed, they will be less likely to abuse their authority.

Happy Valley Heretic
Orem, UT

Because the local authorities (Hurricane) would never abuse the system.
Because the sheriff and his little buddy Mike Noel would never go pulling up park signs in Escalante Monument.
Because Utah never seems to care if theres a republican in the White House.

Petty little men in our legislature who believe in the law of the land, but only before statehood.

KDave
Moab, UT

Yet the courts have ruled that States cannot enforce Federal Law (immigration).

The Real Maverick
Orem, UT

I thought the Constitution was divinely inspired?

Why do repubs hate the Supreme Court and the Constitution so much?

care4usa
Cottonwood Heights, UT

Um, because the Supreme Court doesn't rely on the Constitution. They base their decisions on precedent set by previous Supreme Court decisions not on the Constitution.

care4usa
Cottonwood Heights, UT

We have great respect for the Constitution far less on the black robed mafia that sit on the courts.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments