Published: Saturday, July 6 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT
Fantastic letter!Amen and amen
Hey Joseph, show us the way! Stop using fossil fuel energy yourself, otherwise
you join the ranks of the hypocrites. No more riding in cars, busses or
airplanes, no more eating food unless you produce it yourself without fossil
fuel energy to grow it and transport it. Give up your job unless of course that
does not use energy either! No more air conditioning, or heat in the winter. No
wearing clothes that required energy to produce or transport. No medicines if
you get sick that were produced and transported by evil fossil fuels. Save the
planet and don't be a hypocrite by exhaling "evil" C02!
Mountan, I for one would like to know what you think you have to gain by
ignoring a path to cleaner, healthier, and more sustainable energy. Is it that
you think you are immune to the perils of bad air including methane levels
increasing with the melting of the ice caps? Is it because you would be in
mourning if the captains of the oil industry didn't squeeze every last drop
from the earth's surface? Do you really think that Wall Street will go
under if the price of energy was controlled by supply and demand instead of
commodity speculation? Joseph wrote a great letter and I think we need divert
oil subsidies into development of healthier renewables if no other reason than a
I've done the math. The oil sands are going to be developed, and the
product sold, keystone or not. In addition to the math, I think it's a
sound observation to suggest that the US vehicle fleet is more or less dedicated
to fossil fuel, and that this fact won't change for decades even if a
concerted effort started today. We're going to need oil for a long, long
time to come. A lot of it. Now then, where to get it? From the folks up north,
who send a lot of the benefits back our way and tend not to want to hate us, or
from our good friends in Venezuela or the middle east?
Reading comments that excoriate others for "hypocrisy" because they use
fossil fuels or wear clothes or use medicines leave me bewildered and bemused.
How can anyone believe that we should simply be content with the mess we have
inherited from the past? Shouldn't we be working actively to find BETTER
ways to provide energy, propel our vehicles, warm or cool our homes and clothe
ourselves?Calling anyone a hypocrite because they use the only
resources available to us now while at the same time they try to advocate for
something better is simply nonsensical -- and may I say it -- not very smart at
all.Had the nonsensical naysayers of today been around in the early
1800's, we'd still be burning whale oil for light, riding in horse
drawn vehicles and dying of any number of diseases.
One old man. How smart is it to demand others give up their lives, their jobs
and their health but those of you who demand others must comply don't do so
yourselves? The rich can afford every higher energy but what about those who are
not rich? Are you willing to destroy their live so you can believe you are
"saving the planet" and feel smug and arrogant? Green energy is fine but
so far, it is not feasible nor affordable, especially for the poor who can not
afford your very expensive green energy that does not exist yet! In the
meantime, the temperature of the earth has been stable for 16 years! What a
waste of time!
I don't see how one could be a good Mormon and yet promote the expansion of
fossil fuels. Green energy is available it's just a choice of whether we
want it or not.
MM -- no one is "demanding others give up their lives, their jobs and their
health." To make that claim is simply a matter of parroting the propaganda
of those who are skilled at deluding people who are unable -- or unwilling -- to
think for themselves and learn the truth.In fact, when you actually
stop to THINK about it, what people like me are doing is trying our best to make
sure that others will NOT have to give up their lives, their jobs and their
health. Unless wisdom succeeds in overcoming the delusional thinking of some
people out there, we will soon find ourselves out of oil, out of water, out of a
healthy atmosphere and, in short, out of a healthy world for everyone.If you wish to doom your descendants to that kind of future, go ahead. The
real waste of time is short-sighted thinking that desperately tries to protect
present day profits without seeking long term solutions. If we don't seek
those solutions, green energy will never become feasible and affordable.
I support the President's call for a shift away from fossil fuels.
Obviously it will take time, but it's past time to begin. The new
generation of nuclear plants is a step in the right direction, as well as
thermal solar plants that can heat entire cities.
Ole man. That's all well and good in theory but try telling that to a
nation who has to choose between $4.00/gal gasoline to get to work and buying
food and clothes for their families. Try telling that to any business owner who
has try to buy energy to manufacture and move their products to the market and
then has to pass along high energy prices to his customers and tell him to use
green energy to compete with goods made in China! Tell THEM to use green energy!
Perfect recipe for economic collapse! Where are the millions of "green
energy" jobs Obama promised? Answer: there are none and billions of taxpayer
dollars have been and are being squandered by the government trying to produce
green energy! Like it are no we are DEPENDANT on fossil fuels!
Once again, the US citizens will take on the risk for the reward of a few
corporations. The pipeline will do nothing more than run across the US so
Canadian oil can be easily sold to Asia. It will not decrease US gas prices but
we'll run the risk of spills. The Keystone pipeline will be a huge
This letter epitomizes the left's naive, utopian view. There is no magic
wand to wave and suddenly reduce our dependence on oil. It will take time,
major technological break-throughs, and a lot of investment. The
fact is that we need it now, and we need it badly. Not approving the Keystone
pipeline would be like telling a diabetic that she can have a different medicine
later, just not the old, proven one now.
Alternative energy sources for transportation are not yet available. The best
alternative we have is natural gas. NOTHING else is even in the development
stage to replace oil for cars, big trucks, and trains.Go ahead and
say we need to switch over, but please suggest a specific alternative. And
don't forget trucking, or your alternative is insufficient to make a real
Guys like Moutaman would still be slaughtering whales for oil if they could.-----Thinkin\' ManRexburg, ID"This letter epitomizes the left's naive, utopian view. There is no
magic wand to wave and suddenly reduce our dependence on oil. It will take time,
major technological break-throughs, and a lot of investment. The
fact is that we need it now, and we need it badly."We don't
NEED more oil or even new technology, We need to be better stewards with
what we've got.A truck/SUV burning 9 miles per gallon, vs. cars
getting 40+ is not new major break through technology but just plain old common
sense.What we need to do is to pay full market price of $7 per
gallon without government subsidizes like Europe and Asia does to see how the
free markets adjusts.
Yes, MM, we are dependent upon fossil fuels and will be for an unfortunately
long time. But your idea that we must simply accept that as an unchangeable
fact is foolish in the extreme. Even more concerning that that,
however, are the slanted exaggerations you constantly use as you try to demean
other, more sensible folks here.What would happen if both sides --
right and left -- came together with the idea of actually TRYING to work with
one another to seek solutions?Why are you afraid of something like
MM is simply promoting the company line instead of thinking of solutions.Imagine what would happen if we concentrated on solutions rather than
scoring points in this political football game? How much longer will repubs
refuse to solve anything and remain angry spoiled obstructionists?
I work in the energy sector.... and I find chat like this most amusing. It
wasn't too long ago that America came to prominence by being the agents of
change.... by abandoning the old, and looking to the new - to drive economic
growth. Now that we feel we are comfortability on top.... we cling to the old
just as other old empires did... hoping that if we keep change from our door.
We, as a society, are falling into the endless trap that once on
top, we want to freeze how things are..... while young, more ambitious, and
more risk willing societies innovate and move forward. China, Brazil, and
India are among those that are more hungry than we are.... and the end result
will be the same.So keep drilling, developing yesterdays
technology.... while others move ahead.
"Advocating actions which are detrimental to society and civilization is
irresponsible and immoral. Please stop."Yes, please stop
advocating detrimental actions...Actions like giving taxpayer funds
to crony-socialist solar energy frauds.Actions like requiring
gasoline to contain ethanol, the creation of which consumes more fuel per gallon
than it produces, and raises world food prices.Actions like locking
up Utah low-sulfur coal so that dirtier energy sources are used instead.Actions like forcing up the cost of electricity by myopic utopian
decrees that bypass the legislative process.Actions like demonizing
nuclear power plants and preventing sensible nuclear waste disposal.When 'green' energy sources are really ready for market they will
succeed on their own merits.In the meantime, thank you Joseph for
sharing your personal beliefs with us today.
"When 'green' energy sources are really ready for market they will
succeed on their own merits."This is a laughable argument....
because most American businesses don't exist on their own merits.... the
most exceptional of American businesses benefited from government support,
investment, and intervention. Lets no confuse idealism with the real world.
Re Sensible ScientistSuggest an alternative? How about making use
of geothermal, especially that of Yellowstone? Yellowstone alone could supply
70 billion watts or enough to replace 35 large coal power plants.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments