Quantcast

Comments about ‘Nuclear plant closures show industry's struggles’

Return to article »

Published: Saturday, June 8 2013 12:39 p.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Baron Scarpia
Logan, UT

Fukushima will continue to scare people into not trusting the utilities or government in operating nuclear power. The government is not willing to subsidize the massive upfront costs to build a plant (some estimates for a new plant are $15 billion), and now the rate payers and tax payers will have to pay the $1 billion-plus to dismantle and clean up this nuclear plant. Banks don't see nuclear as a safe investment.

While the low natural gas prices are not likely to continue, the one benefit of the nation's rapid shift to natural gas currently is that these types of power plants are very flexible in terms of ramping up and down to match load. Wind and solar, the fastest-growing energy sources today, are variable in output, so natural gas is the best "partner" to facilitate this rapid growth. That is, when the sun sets or winds die down, natural gas can be ramped up to match load. When the winds blow or sun shines, you can shut off natural gas plants to save on the cost of burning fuel.

Nuclear power cannot be ramped up and down to meet the 21st century's emerging energy infrastructure.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments