According to the new state law 76-6-112 you are incorrectly bashing, if the
women was in the public right of way she was not violating the law by videoing.
See (d) below.If her claim was correct, that she was in the public
right of way, the judge was following the law and the plant was either not aware
of the law or was wrongly trying to threaten her. What wasn't clear in the
court documents was some inconsistencies in her testimony and others. And so if
she was not criminally trespassing while recording, she was not in violation of
the law. A person is guilty of agricultural operation interference
if the person:(a) .... leaving a recording device on the agricultural
operation;(b) obtains access to an agricultural operation under false
pretenses;(c) ..... employment..... (d) without consent from
the owner of the operation or the owner's agent, knowingly or intentionally
records an image of, or sound from, an agricultural operation while the person
is committing criminal trespass, as described in Section 76-6-206, on the
The spin that they were keeping "trophies or trinkets" means they were
unlawfully confiscating personal property of another with an intent to deprive.
The non spin term would be theft. The act of not keeping the chain of evidence
of drugs, means unlawful felony possession of the drugs. These are criminal
offenses if not committed by a band of hang together police that support each
other. Time to have an aggressive media about this organization.