"orry did I miss your response letters where you expressed regret for your
misleadings and mean spiritedness?"YOu must have... in the shale
oil piece a few days ago I misread a response by "happy valley" I think
it was and responded with a shale gas example.... which didn't apply.
After having my mistake pointed out.... I apologized for the mistake. Look it
up... it is out there for all to see."Yes mine may be more mean
spirited then yours, but I don't apologize for that!"Imagine my surprise.
RE: BDevil In Lost's response to the letter writer, its not a
great stretch to conclude that the lettere writer was calling out what he
determined to be "worse" behavior by the GOP, since he never mentions
negative behavior by his and your own side. I know when your biaa, its easy to
overlook these things. As for my response to the letter, thanks
for the preachy sermon on my lack of character and social habits. I am perfectly
willing to admit imperfection, and that there are better ways then mine. Sorry
did I miss your response letters where you expressed regret for your misleadings
and mean spiritedness? Couldn't get them past the DN editors. Darn, I know
how that is! However, I don't write ridicules, myopic and one sided
letters to the editor like this. I only respond to them, when they attack my
side, and especially ignore all the stupidity on the other side. Yes mine may be
more mean spirited then yours, but I don't apologize for that!
Lost.... exactly where did you read the author saying it was worse? I
didn't see that anywhere. What, there can only be wrong doing by one
side... and of course in your world that is the liberal side?HaHa
person - so your point is gossip is ok, because the other side does it too. Is
that how we set our moral standards? Poor behavior by one side is justified by
poor behavior by the other. Next time your kids do something wrong and claim
as their defense "that the other kids were doing it".... lets see how
that rational works for you.... why not chew on that for a while.... or if your
not old enough to have kids, you will see how inane that argument is when you
do..If someone has to win by making their opponent look bad (liberal
or conservative), it generally point to the fact that they have nothing positive
going for themselves. If you have to make the other person look bad, for you to
look good... you don't have very much going on for you.... regardless of
party, team, religion or whatever.
Just to be clear...someone privately expressing their unflattering opinion of a
handfull of lame democrats is defined as gossip? Wow...learn something new
everyday. Now let me guess, this letter writer thinks Mr. Obama and
his democrat senators are the antithesis of all the litny of eveils he just
described in his letter. Productive, non-finger-pointers, and not seeking 15
minutes of fame? Sorry if I disagree, but I find most dems to be phoney, lying,
big government worshippers, who cant get enough of turning the population into
dependant, regulated stooges. They have a warped since of how facts and dates
lineup together, and most don't have a productive bone in their body. Chew
on that GOSSIP for a while!
Mitch mcConnell stated, "My job is to make Obama a one-term
president."I think all hope for him to lead was lost then and
there. You cannot lead when your top desire is merely to destroy one
person's political career.
Unfortunate that you think a little gossip is worse than the gross and likely
illegal invasion of privacy.