Mark B,I graduated college, got married, got a good job, had three kids,
bought a house and some cars, sent my kids to school/mission. All WITHOUT
BO's help!! Amazing!And by what wild stretch the paranoid left
conspiracy theory imagination do you come up with M-man desiring an occupying
Two words: Mission accomplished.....third word, NOT!!
As bad as it was, last week's events would not have been less sad or better
organized with an occupying army, which M-man seems to prefer. The attack was
treated as it should have been - a CRIME. BTW, has M-man heard the news that
every injured person who was admitted to a hospital is likely to live? And to
think it was all done without the NRA's help.
The National Journal reported that a senior State Department official has
announced, “The war on terror is over". That was of course before
Benghazi and the Boston attacks! That may explain why Obama refuses to call
these attacks terrorism or the perpetrators terrorists! He defeated terrorism
with "clean" (no TV coverage of the collateral damage civilians, no
boots on the ground) right?
Although Obama has largely driven this Country into the ground with his program
of unrestrained entitlement spending, this is one area in which he deserves high
praise. He has not hesitated to use the means at his disposal to attack
terrorists and limit the danger they pose to the American public.Sadly, both the Senate and the House are now full of softies who do not have
the stomach to stand up and fight. Apparently, they would rather that Obama
hand out tulips and lollipops to the terrorists in the hope that being soft on
terror will eliminate it. How naive and misguided.Their is only one
way to deal with terrorists: with an iron fist. Those who are occupants of the
real world know this irrefutable fact.